Skip to main content
Log in

Performance Implications of Meshing Degree for Optical Burst Switched Networks Using One-Way Resource Reservation Protocols

  • Published:
Telecommunication Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper discusses performance implications of meshing degree (or nodal degree) for optical burst switching (OBS) mesh networks using one-way resource reservation protocols. The analysis is focused on the following topologies: rings, chordal rings with nodal degrees ranging from three to six, mesh-torus, NSFNET, ARPANET and the European Optical Network (EON). It is shown that the largest nodal degree gain, due to the increase of the nodal degree from two to around three, is observed for degree-three chordal ring topology, where as the smallest gain is observed for the ARPANET. For these cases, the magnitude of the nodal degree gain is slightly less than three orders for the degree-three chordal ring and less than one order of magnitude for the ARPANET. On the other hand, when the nodal degree increases from two to a value ranging from about four up to six, the nodal degree gain ranges between four and six orders of magnitude for chordal rings. However, EON, which has a nodal degree slightly less than four has the smallest nodal degree gain. The observed gain for this case is less than one order of magnitude. Since burst loss is a key issue in OBS networks, these results clearly show the importance of meshing degree for this kind of networks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. B.W. Arden and H. Lee, Analysis of Chordal Ring Networks, IEEE Transactions on Computers.C-30(4) (1981) 291–295.

    Google Scholar 

  2. I. Baldine, G.N. Rouskas, H.G. Perros and D. Stevenson, Jump Start: A just-in-time signaling architecture for WDM burst-switched networks, IEEE Communications Magazine 40(2) (2002) 82–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. I. Baldine, G.N. Rouskas, H.G. Perros and D. Stevenson, Signaling Support for Multicast and Qo S within the jumpstartWDM burst switching architecture, Optical Networks 4(6) (2003) 68–80.

    Google Scholar 

  4. A. Detti and M. Listanti, Application of Tell & Go and Tell & Wait Reservation Strategies in a Optical Burst Switching Network: A Performance Comparison}, in: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Telecommunication (ICT) (Bucharest, Romania, 2001)pp. 540–548.

  5. M. Duser and P. Bayvel, Analysis of a Dynamically Wavelength-Routed Optical Burst Switched Network Architecture, IEEE Journal of Lightwave Technology 20(4) (2002) 574–585.

    Google Scholar 

  6. T.K. Nayak and K.N. Sivarajan, A New Approach to Dimensioning Optical Networks, IEEE Journalon Selected Areas in Communications 20(1) (2002) 134–148.

    Google Scholar 

  7. M.J. O'Mahony, Results from the COST 239 project: Ultra-high Capacity Optical Transmission Networks, in:Proceedings European Conf. on Optical Communication (ECOC) (Oslo, Norway, 1996) pp. 2.11–2.18.

  8. C. Qiao and M. Yoo, Optical burst switching (OBS)—A New Paradigm for an Optical Internet, Journal of High Speed Networks 8(1) (1999) 69–84.

    Google Scholar 

  9. S. Ramesh, G.N. Rouskas and H.G. Perros, Computing blocking probabilities in multiclass wavelength-routing networks with multicast calls, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications 20(1) (2002) 89–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. J.J.P.C. Rodrigues, N.M. Garcia, M.M. Freire and P. Lorenz, Object-Oriented Modeling and Simulation of Optical Burst Switching Networks}, in: 2004 IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference Workshops(GLOBECOM'2004) (Dallas, Texas, 2004) pp. 288–292.

  11. M. Sridharan, M.V. Salapaka and A.K. Somani, A Practical Approach to Operating Survivable Wdmnetworks, IEEE Journal of Selected Areas in Communications 20(1) (2002) 34–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. J. Teng and G.N. Rouskas, A comparison of the JIT, JET, and Horizon Wavelength Reservation Schemes on ASingle OBS node, in: The First International Workshop on Optical Burst Switching, (Dallas, Texas, USA 2003)

  13. J. Teng and G.N. Rouskas, A Detailed Analysis and Performance Comparison of Wavelength Reservation Schemes for Optical Burst Switched Networks, Photonic Network Communications 9(3) (2005) 75–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. J.S. Turner, Terabit Burst switching, Journal of High Speed Networks 8(1) (1999) 3–16.

    Google Scholar 

  15. I. Widjaja, Performance Analysis of Burst Admission Control Protocols}, IEE Proceedings of Communications 142 (1995) 7–14.

    Google Scholar 

  16. J.Y. Wei and R.I. McFarland, Just-in-time signaling for WDM optical burst switching networks, IEEE Journal of Lightwave Technology 18(12) (2000) 2019–2037.

    Google Scholar 

  17. A.H. Zaim, I. Baldine, M. Cassada, G.N. Rouskas, H.G. Perros and D. Stevenson, The Jump Start Just-In-Time Signaling Protocol: A Formal Description Using EFSM, Optical Engineering 42(2) (2003) 568–585.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to JOEL J. P. C. RODRIGUES.

Additional information

Part of this work has been supported by the Group of Networks and Multimedia of the Institute of Telecommunications—Covilhã Lab, Portugal, by POSI/EEA-CPS/60247/2004 CONDENSA Project, and by the Euro-NGI Network of Excellence of Sixth Framework Programme of EU.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

RODRIGUES, J.J.P.C., FREIRE, M.M. & LORENZ, P. Performance Implications of Meshing Degree for Optical Burst Switched Networks Using One-Way Resource Reservation Protocols. Telecommun Syst 30, 35–47 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11235-005-4312-5

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11235-005-4312-5

Keywords

Navigation