Abstract
The need for strategic planning of the internationalization process in universities is inevitable. The key stakeholders in higher education institutions (HEIs) are expected to be involved in the strategy-making process. It is argued that international office professionals (IPs) are one of these key stakeholders and need to be part of strategy development. The study aims to explore IPs’ conceptualization of internationalization, their needs, and roles in the universities, as well as their perceptions of strategic planning, management, and institutionalization of internationalization in European and Turkish universities. In this qualitative research, 23 semi-structured interviews with IPs showed that they are not sufficiently involved in the strategy-making process and could not contribute to this with their expertise as expected. This non-involvement observed in both settings has led them to imitate quantitative global strategies similar to that of universities, like increasing the number of international students. Moreover, the comparative analysis showed that European universities utilize more democratic and participatory decision-making than Turkish universities, which have little or no participation of IPs in decision-making in internationalization.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Association of International Education Administrators (AIEA) (2017). The SIO profile: A preliminary analysis of the survey on senior international education officers, their institutions and offices. https://www.aieaworld.org/assets/docs/Surveys/final-2017%20executive%20summary_sio%20profile%20survey.pdf
Beelen, J. (2017). International officers finding their role in internationalization at home.EAIE Blog. https://www.eaie.org/blog/international-officers-finding-role-internationalisation-home.html
Biedermann, H., & Strehl, F. (2004). Leistungsvereinbarung. In Höllinger, Titscher, die österreichische universitätsreform. 219–245.
Cai, Y., & Mehari, Y. (2015). The use of institutional theory in higher education research. In J. Huisman, & M. Tight (Eds.), Theory and method in higher Education Research (pp. 1–25). Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2056-375220150000001001.
Cruz, N. (2019). Senior international offices as entrepreneurs: Creating new solutions for the 21st century.CIHE Perspectives,14. https://www.bc.edu/content/dam/bc1/schools/lsoe/sites/cihe/publication/Perspectives/Perspectives%20No%2014%20WES-CIHE%20UPDATED%20PDF%2002-18-2020.pdf
Creswell, J. W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: choosing among five traditions. Sage Publications, Inc.
CoHE (Council of Higher Education). (2022). Higher education statistics. https://istatistik.yok.gov.tr/
De Haan, H. (2014). Can internationalisation really lead to institutional competitive advantage?–a study of 16 dutch public higher education institutions. European Journal of Higher Education, 4(2), 135–152. https://doi.org/10.1080/21568235.2013.860359.
Deschamps, E., & Lee, J. J. (2015). Internationalization as mergers and acquisitions: senior international officers’ entrepreneurial strategies and activities in public universities. Journal of Studies in International Education, 19(2), 122–139. https://doi.org/10.1177/1028315314538284.
De Wit, H. (2015). Internationalization misconceptions. Internationalization Higher Education, 64(Summer), 6–7. https://doi.org/10.6017/ihe.2011.64.8556.
De Wit, H., & Hunter, F. (2014). Europe’s 25 years of internationalization: the EAIE in a changing World. International Higher Education, 74, 14–15. https://doi.org/10.6017/ihe.2014.74.5467.
De Wit, H., & Jones, E. (2018). Inclusive internationalization: improving access and equity. International Higher Education, 94, 16–18.
De Wit, H., Hunter, F., Howard, I., & Egron-Polak, E. (2015). Internationalization of Higher Education. European Parliament Policy Department: Brussels, Belgium.
DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociology Review, 48(2), 147–160.
European University Association (2022). University Autonomy in Europe Index. https://www.university-autonomy.eu/about/
Fındıklı, B. (2020). A republic of scholars or scholars of the republic? Reflections on the predicaments of academic freedom and university autonomy in Turkey. Higher Education Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1111/hequ.12287.
Fumasoli, T., & Huisman, J. (2013). Strategic agency and system diversity: conceptualizing institutional positioning. Higher Education Minerva, 51(2), 155–169. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-013-9225-y.
Foskett, N. (2012). Global markets, national challenges, local strategies: the strategic challenge of internationalization. In F. Maringe, & N. Foskett (Eds.), Globalization and internationalization in Higher Education (pp. 35–51). Bloomsbury Publishing.
Hantrais, L. (1995). Comparative research methodshttps://sru.soc.surrey.ac.uk/SRU13.html.
Hantrais, L. (2009). International comparative research: theory, methods, and practice. London: Palgrave.
Hénard, F., Diamond, L., & Roseveare, D. (2012). Approaches to internationalisation and their implications for strategic management and institutional practice: a guide for higher education institutions. OECD Higher Education Programme IMHE.
Heyl, J., & Tullbane, J. (2012). Leadership in international higher education. In D. K. Deardorff, H. d. Wit, & J. D. Heyl (Eds.) The SAGE handbook of international higher education (pp. 113–130). SAGE Publications, Inc., https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452218397.n7
Hudzik, J. K. (2011). Comprehensive internationalization: from concept to action. Washington, DC: NAFSA: Association of International Educators.
Hunter, F. (2018). Training administrative staff to become key players in the internationalization of higher education. International Higher Education, 92, 16–17.
Hunter, F., Jones, E., & de Wit, H. (2018). The staff who are overlooked in internationalisation. University World News. https://www.universityworldnews.com/post.php?story=20181031081234166.
Jiang, X. (2008). Towards the internationalisation of higher education from a critical perspective. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 32(4), 347–358. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098770802395561.
Kristensen, K. H., & Karlsen, J. E. (2018). Strategies for internationalisation at technical universities in the nordic countries. Tertiary Education and Management, 24(1), 19–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/13583883.2017.1323949.
Knight, J. (2015). International universities: misunderstandings and emerging models? Journal of Studies in International Education, 19(2), 107–121. https://doi.org/10.1177/1028315315572899.
Middlehurst, R., & Woodfield, S. (2007). International activity or internationalisation strategy? Insights from an institutional pilot study in the UK. Tertiary Education and Management, 13(3), 263–279. https://doi.org/10.1080/13583880701502190.
Mintzberg, H. (1990). Strategy formation: schools of Thought. In J. Frederickson (Ed.), Perspectives on Strategic Management (pp. 105–237). New York: Harper Business.
O’Reilly, A., Hickey, T., & Ryan, D. (2013). Higher education professionals’ perspectives on international student experiences of life and learning in Ireland: a qualitative study, Irish Educational Studies, 32(3), 355–375https://doi.org/10.1080/03323315.2013.826334
Perez-Encinas, A. (2018). A collaborative Approach in the Internationalisation cycle of Higher Education Institutions. In A. Curaj, L. Deca, & R. Pricopie (Eds.), European Higher Education Area: the impact of past and future policies. Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77407-7_8.
Rumbley, L. E. (2015). “Intelligent internationalization”: a 21st century imperative. International Higher Education, 80, 16–17. https://doi.org/10.6017/ihe.2015.80.6146.
Rybnicek, R., Gutschelhofer, A., Suk, K., & Plakolm, J. (2016). Changes in higher education: a comparison of key factors concerning universities in Austria and Switzerland. Review of Innovation and Competitiveness, 2(3), 5–26.
Schriewer, J. (2009). “Rationalized myths” in European higher education. European Education, 41(2), 31–51. https://doi.org/10.2753/EUE1056-4934410202.
Soderqvist, M. (2002). Internationalisation and its management at higher education institutions: applying conceptual, content and discourse analysis. Helsinki: Helsinki School of Economics. http://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:951-791-718-X.
Soliman, S., Anchor, J., & Taylor, D. (2019). The international strategies of universities: deliberate or emergent? Studies in Higher Education, 44(8), 1413–1424. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2018.1445985.
Stake, R. E. (2006). Multiple case study analysis. New York: The Guilford Press.
Stensaker, B., & Fumasoli, T. (2017). Multi-level strategies in universities: coordination, contestation or creolisation? Higher Education Quarterly, 71, 263–273.
Taylor, J. (2010). The management of internationalization in higher education. In F. Maringe, & N. Foskett (Eds.), Globalization and internationalization in Higher Education (pp. 97–107). Bloomsbury Publishing.
Tran, L. T. C., Lacost, B., & Grady, M. L. (2020). The leadership of senior international officers: a qualitative study. Perspectives: Policy and Practice in Higher Education, 24(4), 136–145. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603108.2020.1802787.
Van der Wende, M. (2001). Internationalization policies: about new trends and contrasting paradigms. Higher Education Policy, 14, 249–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0952-8733(01)00018-6
Yang, R. (2002). University internationalization: its meanings, rationales and implications. Intercultural Education, 13(1), 81–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/14675980120112968.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Bulut-Sahin, B., Emil, S., Okur, S. et al. Strategic management of internationalization in higher education institutions: the lens of international office professionals. Tert Educ Manag 29, 429–445 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11233-023-09121-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11233-023-09121-2