Skip to main content

Gold in them there hills? Extracting and using data from existing sources

Abstract

Data residing in institutional and system-level record systems are often under-exploited as a resource for decision-making. Whilst the data might neither have the characteristics, nor meet the quality demanded, of formal research projects, their relative availability offers advantages to the policy-maker and practitioner. This article illustrates with a number of examples the potential of available data for informing policy and practice at different levels within an education system.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. Adelman, C. (2004). The empirical curriculum: Changes in postsecondary course-taking, 1972–2000. Washington, DC: US Department of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Armstrong, M., Clarkson, P., & Noble, M. (1998). Modularity and credit frameworks: The NUCCAT survey and 1998 conference report. Newcastle upon Tyne: Northern Universities Consortium for Credit Accumulation and Transfer.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Baty, P. (2000). V-c’s ‘plea for firsts’ fuels quality fears. The Times Higher Education Supplement, No. 1442 (30 June), 1.

  4. Baume, D., & Yorke, M. (2002). The reliability of assessment by portfolio on a course to develop and accredit teachers in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 27, 7–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Baume, D., Yorke, M., & Coffey, M. (2004). What is happening when we assess, and how can we use our understanding of this to improve assessment? Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 29, 451–477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ewell, P. T., & Jones, D. P. (1994). Pointing the way: Indicators as policy tools in higher education. In: S. S. Ruppert (Ed.), Charting higher education accountability: A sourcebook on state-level performance indicators (pp. 6–16). Denver, CO: Education Commission of the States.

    Google Scholar 

  7. HESA (2005). Performance Indicators in Higher Education in the UK 2003/04. See http://www.hesa.ac.uk/pi/0304/home.htm (accessed 16 January 2006).

  8. Johnson, V. E. (2003). Grade inflation: A crisis in college education. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Simonite, V. (2000). The effects of aggregation method and variations in the performance of individual students on degree classifications in modular degree courses. Studies in Higher Education, 25, 197–209.

    Google Scholar 

  10. UUK & SCoP. (2004). Measuring and recording student achievement [Report of the Scoping Group chaired by Professor Robert Burgess]. London: Universities UK and the Standing Conference of Principals.

    Google Scholar 

  11. UUK & SCoP. (2005). The UK honours degree: Provision of information [Consultation Paper from the Measuring and Recording Student Achievement Steering Group, the “Burgess Group”]. London: Universities UK and Standing Conference of Principals.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Volkwein, J. F. (1999). The four faces of institutional research. In: J. F. Volkwein (Eds.), What is institutional research all about? A critical and comprehensive assessment of the profession [New Directions for Institutional Research No. 104] (pp. 9–19). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Yorke, M. (2002). Degree classifications in English, Welsh and Northern Irish Universities: Trends, 1994–95 to 1998–99. Higher Education Quarterly, 56, 92–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Yorke, M. (2004). Institutional research and its relevance to the performance of higher education institutions. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 26, 141–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Yorke, M., Barnett, G., Evanson, P., Haines, C., Jenkins, D., Knight, P., Scurry, D., Stowell, M., & Woolf, H. (2004). Some effects of the award algorithm on honours degree classifications in UK higher education. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 29, 399–411.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Yorke.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yorke, M. Gold in them there hills? Extracting and using data from existing sources. Tert Educ Manag 12, 201–213 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11233-006-9001-8

Download citation

Keywords

  • High Education
  • High Education Institution
  • Equal Opportunity
  • Summative Assessment
  • High Education Sector