Abstract
The greater Boston region’s eight research universities play a key role in the region’s economic health and welfare. They are magnets for research and development talent and for billions of dollars in investment. These institutions contribute $7.4 billion dollars to the regional economy, jobs for about 50,000 university employees and 37,000 workers in related areas. They produce an annual talent pool of 31,000 graduates many of whom elect to remain in the region and contribute to the exploitation of university patents and licensed technology that sustain the regional economy, as well as its social and cultural institutions. Drawing on economic impact studies conducted for eight institutions in the Boston region we will describe the impact of these universities on the Boston region. We will review the implications of this large concentration of research activity on the region’s economy, labour force, pre and post university educational structures, political leadership, funding sources and social and environmental quality. This paper will explore the issues facing these eight research institutions as they pursue their desire for sustained growth and development. Among these are changes in national research funding priorities, financial incentives for innovation, conflicts with non-university sectors of the economy including competition for housing, manpower and economic resources.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
R. Buderi (1996) The Invention that Changed the World Simon and Schuster New York
J. Conant (2002) Tuxedo Park Simon and Schuster New York
M. Keller P. Keller (2001) Making Harvard Modern New York Oxford
J.R. Killian (1977) Sputnik, Scientists and Eisenhower MIT Press Cambridge
F.H.T. Rhodes (2001) The Creation of the Future Cornell University Press Ithaca
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Simha, O.R. The Economic Impact of Eight Research Universities on the Boston Region. Tert Educ Manag 11, 269–278 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11233-005-5113-9
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11233-005-5113-9