Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Beta pentagon relations

  • Published:
Theoretical and Mathematical Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The (quantum) pentagon relation underlies the existing constructions of three-dimensional quantum topology in the combinatorial framework of triangulations. We discuss a special class of integral pentagon relations and their relations to the Faddeev-type operator pentagon relations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. L. C. Biedenharn, J. Math. Phys., 31, 287–293 (1953).

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. J. P. Elliott, Proc. Roy. Soc. London. Ser. A, 218, 345–370 (1953).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. R. Kashaev, F. Luo, and G. Vartanov, “A TQFT of Turaev-Viro type on shaped triangulations,” arXiv:1210.8393v1 [math.QA] (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  4. J. E. Andersen and R. Kashaev, “A new formulation of the Teichmüller TQFT,” arXiv:1305.4291v1 [math.GT] (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  5. G. Ponzano and T. Regge, “Semiclassical limit of Racah coefficients,” in: Spectroscopic and Group Theoretical Methods in Physics (F. Bloch, S. G. Cohen, A. De-Shalit, S. Sambursky, and I. Talmi, eds.), North-Holland, Amsterdam (1968), pp. 1–58.

    Google Scholar 

  6. V. G. Turaev and O. Ya. Viro, Topology, 31, 865–902 (1992).

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. L. D. Faddeev, Lett. Math. Phys., 34, 249–254 (1995).

    Article  ADS  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. T. Shintani, J. Fac. Sci. Univ. Tokyo Sect. IA Math., 24, 167–199 (1977).

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. N. Kurokawa, Proc. Japan Acad. Ser. A Math. Sci., 67, 61–64 (1991).

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. E. W. Barnes, Trans. Cambridge Philos. Soc., 19, 374–425 (1904).

    Google Scholar 

  11. L. D. Faddeev, “Current-like variables in massive and massless integrable models,” arXiv:hep-th/9408041v1 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  12. L. D. Faddeev, R. M. Kashaev, and A. Yu. Volkov, Commun. Math. Phys., 219, 199–219 (2001).

    Article  ADS  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. A. Yu. Volkov, Commun. Math. Phys., 258, 257–273 (2005).

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. S. L. Woronowicz, Rev. Math. Phys., 12, 873–920 (2000).

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. R. M. Kashaev, “Discrete Liouville equation and Teichmüller theory,” in: Handbook of Teichmüller Theory (IRMA Lect. Math. Theoret. Phys., Vol. 17), Vol. 3, Eur. Math. Soc. (EMS), Zürich (2012), pp. 821–851.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. V. P. Spiridonov, Russian Math. Surveys, 56, 185–186 (2001).

    Article  ADS  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Section de mathématiques, Université de Genève, Geneva, Switzerland

    R. M. Kashaev

Authors
  1. R. M. Kashaev
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. M. Kashaev.

Additional information

Dedicated to Professor Ludvig Faddeev on the occasion of his 80th birthday

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kashaev, R.M. Beta pentagon relations. Theor Math Phys 181, 1194–1205 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11232-014-0208-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11232-014-0208-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation