Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

New perturbation theory representation of the conformal symmetry breaking effects in gauge quantum field theory models

  • Published:
Theoretical and Mathematical Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We propose a hypothesis on the detailed structure for the representation of the conformal symmetry breaking term in the basic Crewther relation generalized in the perturbation theory framework in QCD renormalized in the \(\overline {MS} \) scheme. We establish the validity of this representation in the O(α 4 s ) approximation. Using the variant of the generalized Crewther relation formulated here allows finding relations between specific contributions to the QCD perturbation series coefficients for the flavor nonsinglet part of the Adler function D ns A for the electron-positron annihilation in hadrons and to the perturbation series coefficients for the Bjorken sum rule S Bjp for the polarized deep-inelastic lepton-nucleon scattering. We find new relations between the α 4 s coefficients of D ns A and S Bjp . Satisfaction of one of them serves as an additional theoretical verification of the recent computer analytic calculations of the terms of order α 4 s in the expressions for these two quantities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. V. A. Matveev, P. M. Muradjan, and A. N. Tavkhelidze, Phys. Part. Nucl., 2, 7 (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  2. O. Aharony, S. S. Gubser, J. M. Maldacena, H. Ooguri, and Y. Oz, Phys. Rept., 323, 183–386 (2000); arXiv:hepth/9905111v3 (1999).

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. M. Baker and K. Johnson, Phys. A, 96, 120–130 (1979).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. V. M. Braun, G. P. Korchemsky, and D. Mueller, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys., 51, 311–398 (2003); arXiv:hep-ph/0306057v1 (2003).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. R. J. Crewther, Phys. Rev. Lett., 28, 1421–1424 (1972).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. S. L. Adler, C. G. Callan, D. J. Gross, and R. Jackiw, Phys. Rev. D, 6, 2982–2988 (1972).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. N. N. Bogoliubov and D. V. Shirkov, Introduction to Quantum Field Theory [in Russian], Nauka, Moscow (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  8. M. S. Chanowitz and J. R. Ellis, Phys. Lett. B, 40, 397–400 (1972).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. N. K. Nielsen, Nucl. Phys. B, 120, 212–220 (1977).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. S. L. Adler, J. C. Collins, and A. Duncan, Phys. Rev. D, 15, 1712–1721 (1977).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. J. C. Collins, A. Duncan, and S. D. Joglekar, Phys. Rev. D, 16, 438–449 (1977).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. P. Minkowski, “On the anomalous divergence of the dilaton current in gauge theories,” Preprint No. 76-0813, Univ. of Bern, Bern (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  13. D. J. Broadhurst and A. L. Kataev, Phys. Lett. B, 315, 179–187 (1993); arXiv:hep-ph/9308274v1 (1993).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. S. G. Gorishny, A. L. Kataev, and S. A. Larin, Phys. Lett. B, 259, 144–150 (1991).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. L. R. Surguladze and M. A. Samuel, Phys. Rev. Lett., 66, 560–563 (1991); Erratum, 66, 2416 (1991).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. S. A. Larin and J. A. M. Vermaseren, Phys. Lett. B, 259, 345–352 (1991).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. K. G. Chetyrkin, Phys. Lett. B, 391, 402–412 (1997); arXiv:hep-ph/9608480v1 (1996).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. K. G. Chetyrkin, A. L. Kataev, and F. V. Tkachov, Phys. Lett. B, 85, 277–279 (1979).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. M. Dine and J. R. Sapirstein, Phys. Rev. Lett., 43, 668–671 (1979).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. W. Celmaster and R. J. Gonsalves, Phys. Rev. Lett., 44, 560–564 (1980).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. S. G. Gorishny and S. A. Larin, Phys. Lett. B, 172, 109–112 (1986).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. E. B. Zijlstra and W. L. van Neerven, Phys. Lett. B, 297, 377–384 (1992).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. G. T. Gabadadze and A. L. Kataev, JETP Lett., 61, 448–452 (1995).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  24. A. L. Kataev, “The generalized Crewther relation: The peculiar aspects of the analytical perturbative QCD calculations,” in: Proc. 2nd Workshop on Continuous Advances in QCD (Minneapolis, Minn., 28–31 March 1996, M. I. Polikarpov, ed.), World Scientific, Singapore (1996), p. 107–132; arXiv:hep-ph/9607426v1 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  25. S. L. Adler and W. A. Bardeen, Phys. Rev., 182, 1517–1536 (1969).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  26. R. J. Crewther, Phys. Lett. B, 397, 137–142 (1997); arXiv:hep-ph/9701321v1 (1997).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  27. D. Muller, Private communication (1996).

  28. S. J. Brodsky, G. T. Gabadadze, A. L. Kataev, and H. J. Lu, Phys. Lett. B, 372, 133–140 (1996); arXiv:hep-ph/9512367v1 (1995).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  29. J. Rathsman, Phys. Rev. D, 54, 3420–3426 (1996); arXiv:hep-ph/9605401v1 (1996).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  30. G. Grunberg and A. L. Kataev, Phys. Lett. B, 279, 352–358 (1992).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  31. S. J. Brodsky, G. P. Lepage, and P. B. Mackenzie, Phys. Rev. D, 28, 228–235 (1983).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  32. S. J. Brodsky and H. J. Lu, Phys. Rev. D, 51, 3652–3668 (1995); arXiv:hep-ph/9405218v1 (1994).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  33. P. A. Baikov, K. G. Chetyrkin, and J. H. Kuhn, Phys. Rev. Lett., 104, 132004 (2010); arXiv:1001.3606v1 [hep-ph] (2010).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  34. O. V. Tarasov, A. A. Vladimirov, and A. Y. Zharkov, Phys. Lett. B, 93, 429–432 (1980).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  35. S. A. Larin and J. A. M. Vermaseren, Phys. Lett. B, 303, 334–336 (1993); arXiv:hep-ph/9302208v1 (1993).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  36. P. A. Baikov, K. G. Chetyrkin, and J. H. Kühn, “Massless propagators: Applications in QCD and QED,” in: Proc. 8th Intl. Symposium on Radiative Corrections (RADCOR 2007): Application of Quantum Field Theory to Phenomenology (Florence, Italy, 1–6 October 2007) (2007), p. 023; arXiv:0810.4048v1 [hep-ph] (2008).

  37. A. L. Kataev, Phys. Lett. B, 668, 350–352 (2008); arXiv:0808.3121v1 [hep-ph] (2008).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  38. A. L. Kataev, Phys. Lett. B, 691, 82–86 (2010); arXiv:1005.2058v3 [hep-th] (2010).

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  39. A. L. Kataev and S. V. Mikhailov, “New extended Crewther-type relation,” in: Proc. 9th Intl. Symposium on Radiative Corrections (RADCOR 2009): Application of Quantum Field Theory to Phenomenology (Ascona, Switzerland, 25–30 October 2009) (2010), p. 036; arXiv:1001.0728v1 [hep-ph] (2010).

  40. P. A. Baikov, K. G. Chetyrkin, and J. H. Kühn, Phys. Rev. Lett., 101, 012002 (2008); arXiv:0801.1821v2 [hep-ph] (2008).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  41. T. van Ritbergen, J. A. M. Vermaseren, and S. A. Larin, Phys. Lett. B, 400, 379–384 (1997); arXiv:hep-ph/9701390v1 (1997).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  42. M. Czakon, Nucl. Phys. B, 710, 485–498 (2005); arXiv:hep-ph/0411261v2 (2004).

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  43. S. V. Mikhailov, JHEP, 0706, 009 (2007); arXiv:hep-ph/0411397v4 (2004); “Any order generalization of BLM procedure in QCD,” in: Proc. 13th Intl. Seminar Quarks’2004 (Pushkinskie Gory, Russia, 24–30 May 2004, D. G. Levkov, V. A. Matveev, and V. A. Rubakov, eds.), Vol. 2, Inst. Nucl. Res., Moscow (2005), p. 536–550.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  44. A. L. Kataev and A. A. Pivovarov, JETP Lett., 38, 369–371 (1983).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  45. L. J. Clavelli and L. R. Surguladze, Phys. Rev. Lett., 78, 1632–1635 (1997); arXiv:hep-ph/9610493v1 (1996).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  46. D. I. Kazakov, Nucl. Phys. (Proc. Suppl.), 203–204, 118–154 (2010); arXiv:1010.5419v1 [hep-ph] (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  47. S. Akula, N. Chen, D. Feldman, M. Liu, Z. Liu, P. Nath, and G. Peim, Phys. Lett. B, 699, 377–382 (2011); arXiv:1103.1197v1 [hep-ph] (2011).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  48. M. E. Machacek and M. T. Vaughn, Nucl. Phys. B, 236, 221–232 (1984).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  49. C. N. Lovett-Turner and C. J. Maxwell, Nucl. Phys. B, 452, 188–212 (1995); arXiv:hep-ph/9505224v3 (1995).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  50. L. Clavelli, P. W. Coulter, and L. R. Surguladze, Phys. Rev. D, 55, 4268–4272 (1997); arXiv:hep-ph/9611355v1 (1996).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  51. T. Banks and A. Zaks, Nucl. Phys. B, 196, 189–204 (1982).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute for Nuclear Research, RAS, Moscow, Russia

    A. L. Kataev

  2. Bogoliubov Laboratory of Theoretical Physics, Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, Dubna, Moscow Oblast, Russia

    S. V. Mikhailov

Authors
  1. A. L. Kataev
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. S. V. Mikhailov
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. L. Kataev.

Additional information

Prepared from an English manuscript submitted by the authors; for the Russian version, see Teoreticheskaya i Matematicheskaya Fizika, Vol. 170, No. 2, pp. 174–187, February, 2012.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kataev, A.L., Mikhailov, S.V. New perturbation theory representation of the conformal symmetry breaking effects in gauge quantum field theory models. Theor Math Phys 170, 139–150 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11232-012-0016-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11232-012-0016-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation