Skip to main content
Log in

Sylvester-’t Hooft generators and relations between them for \(\mathfrak{s}\mathfrak{l}(n)\) and \(\mathfrak{g}\mathfrak{l}(n|n)\)

  • Published:
Theoretical and Mathematical Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Among the simple finite-dimensional Lie algebras, only \(\mathfrak{s}\mathfrak{l}(n)\) has two finite-order automorphisms that have no common nonzero eigenvector with the eigenvalue one. It turns out that these automorphisms are inner and form a pair of generators that allow generating all of \(\mathfrak{s}\mathfrak{l}(n)\) under bracketing. It seems that Sylvester was the first to mention these generators, but he used them as generators of the associative algebra of all n×n matrices Mat(n). These generators appear in the description of elliptic solutions of the classical Yang-Baxter equation, the orthogonal decompositions of Lie algebras, ’t Hooft’s work on confinement operators in QCD, and various other instances. Here, we give an algorithm that both generates \(\mathfrak{s}\mathfrak{l}(n)\) and explicitly describes a set of defining relations. For simple (up to the center) Lie superalgebras, analogues of Sylvester generators exist only for \(\mathfrak{g}\mathfrak{l}(n|n)\). We also compute the relations for this case.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. P. Grozman and D. Leites, “Lie superalgebras of supermatrices of complex size: Their generalizations and related integrable systems,” in: Complex Analysis and Related Topics (Oper. Theory, Adv. Appl., Vol. 114, E. R. de Arellano, M. Shapiro, L. Tovar, and N. Vasilevski, eds.), Birkhäuser, Basel (2000), pp. 73–105; math.RT/0202177 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  2. P. Grozman and D. Leites, Czech. J. Phys., 51, 1–22 (2001); hep-th/9702073 (1997).

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. D. Leites and E. Poletaeva, Math. Scand., 81, 5–19 (1997); math.RT/0510019 (2005); P. Grozman, D. Leites, and E. Poletaeva, Homology Homotopy Appl., 4, 259–275 (2002); math.RT/0202152 (2002).

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. P. Grozman and D. Leites, “Defining relations associated with the principal \(\mathfrak{s}\mathfrak{l}(2)\)-subalgebras,” in: Contemporary Mathematical Physics: F. A. Berezin Memorial Volume (Amer. Math. Soc. Transl. Ser. 2, Vol. 175, R. Dobrushin, R. Minlos, M. Shubin, and A. Vershik, eds.), Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, R. I. (1996), pp. 57–67; math-ph/0510013 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  5. D. Leites and A. Sergeev, Theor. Math. Phys., 123, 582–608 (2000); math.RT/0509528 (2005).

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. C. Zachos, “Hamiltonian flows, SU(∞), SO(∞), U Sp(∞), and strings,” in: Differential Geometric Methods in Theoretical Physics: Physics and Geometry (NATO ASI Series, Ser. B, Physics, Vol. 245, L.-L. Chau and W. Nahm, eds.), Plenum, New York (1990), pp. 423–430.

    Google Scholar 

  7. J. Sylvester, Johns Hopkins Univ. Circ., 1, 241 (1882); 2, 46 (1883); 3, 7 (1884); The Collected Mathematics Papers of James Joseph Sylvester, Vol. 3, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge (1909).

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. H. Weyl, Z. Phys., 46, 1–46 (1927); The Theory of Groups and Quantum Mechanics, Dover, New York (1931).

    Article  MATH  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. G. ’t Hooft, Nucl. Phys. B, 138, 1–25 (1978).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. D. Fairlie, P. Fletcher, and C. Zachos, Phys. Lett. B, 218, 203–207 (1989); D. Fairlie and C. Zachos, Phys. Lett. B, 224, 101–111 (1989); J. Math. Phys., 31, 1088–1094 (1990).

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. J. Moyal, Proc. Camb. Philos. Soc., 45, 99–124 (1949).

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. J. Hoppe, Phys. Lett. B, 215, 706–710 (1988).

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. D. Fairlie and C. Zachos, Phys. Lett. B, 620, 195–199 (2005); hep-th/0505053 (2005).

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. A. A. Belavin and V. G. Drinfel’d, Funct. Anal. Appl., 16, No. 3, 159–180 (1982).

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. A. A. Belavin and V. G. Drinfeld, Triangle Equations and Simple Lie Algebras, Harwood, Amsterdam (1998).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. A. I. Kostrikin, I. A. Kostrikin, and V. A. Ufnarovskii, Proc. Steklov Math. Inst., 158, 113–129 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  17. A. I. Kostrikin and Pham Huu Tiep, Orthogonal Decompositions and Integral Lattices (de Gruyter Exp. Math., Vol. 15), De Gruyter, Berlin (1994).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. L. A. Ferreira, D. I. Olive, and M. V. Saveliev, Theor. Math. Phys., 102, 10–22 (1995); hep-th/9411036 (1994).

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Y. Buhturin and A. Molev, Czech. J. Phys., 54, 1159–1164 (2004).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. J. Miller, P. B. Weichman, and M. C. Cross, Phys. Rev. A, 45, 2328–2359 (1992).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. C.-Y. Mou and P. B. Weichman, Phys. Rev. E, 52, 3738–3796 (1995).

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. V. Zeitlin, Phys. D, 49, 353–362 (1991).

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. P. Grozman, “SuperLie,” http://www.equaonline.com/math/SuperLie.

  24. D. A. Leites and V. V. Serganova, Theor. Math. Phys., 58, 16–24 (1984).

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

__________

Translated from Teoreticheskaya i Matematicheskaya Fizika, Vol. 149, No. 1, pp. 3–17, October, 2006.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sachse, C. Sylvester-’t Hooft generators and relations between them for \(\mathfrak{s}\mathfrak{l}(n)\) and \(\mathfrak{g}\mathfrak{l}(n|n)\) . Theor Math Phys 149, 1299–1311 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11232-006-0119-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11232-006-0119-0

Keywords

Navigation