Advertisement

The American Journal of Psychoanalysis

, Volume 65, Issue 4, pp 367–379 | Cite as

Society’s Symbolic Order and Political Trials: Toward Sacrificing the Self for the “Big Other”

  • Avi Lubin
Article
  • 54 Downloads

Abstract

The need to establish a borderline between legitimate and illegitimate political trial is one of the central societal discourses. In this paper the author claims that the issues are complex and that a political trial can remain legitimate as long as it is not dealing with a confrontation with the symbolic order on which the society (and the court itself) is founded and as long as the subject (or action) it is dealing with does not threaten the symbolic order’s (or the “Big Other”) existence. When the symbolic order’s existence is in danger, the court is bound to participate in an act of “sacrifice” that is intended to protect the “order.” The author uses Jacques Lacan’s psychoanalytic theory of the “Big Other” (and its development to ideological-political terms) in examining three categories of sacrifice. Through these categories the author claims that in extreme cases of confrontation with the existence of the symbolic order, the court cannot remain objective and it would be difficult to justify the trial as legitimate (especially in historical perspective).

Keywords

Lacan symbolic order sacrifice political trials Har-Shefi 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Azulai, A. 2000.The Ghost of Yigal AmirTheoria Vebikoret [Theory and Criticism]17926[in Hebrew]Google Scholar
  2. Baum, L.F. 1996.The wonderful wizard of Oz, rev. ed.DoverNew York(Original work published 1900)Google Scholar
  3. Bilsky, L. (1999). Law and politics: Yigal Amir’s trial. Plilim, 8, pp. 13–75 [in Hebrew]Google Scholar
  4. Bruner, J. 1999Yigal AmirTheory and Criticism, Special Issue48–506271 [in Hebrew]Google Scholar
  5. Camus, A. 1942.The strangerRandom HouseNew York(English version published in 1988)Google Scholar
  6. Douglas, L. 2001.The memory of judgment: Making law and history in the trials of the HolocaustYale University PressNew Haven, CT17Google Scholar
  7. Kirchheimer, O. 1955.Politics and justiceSocial Research22408427Google Scholar
  8. Lacan, J. 1973.The four fundamental concepts of psychoanalysis: Seminar XI. (Trans., A. Sheridan)Hogarth PressLondonGoogle Scholar
  9. Osiel, M. 1997.Mass atrocity, collective memory and the lawBrunswick and LondonTransaction5978Google Scholar
  10. Plessy vs. Ferguson. (1896). 163 U.S. 537Google Scholar
  11. Saramago, J. 1991.The gospel According to Jesus ChristHarper–CollinsLondon(English version published in 1993)Google Scholar
  12. Shklar, J.N. 1964.Legalism: Law, morals and political trialsHarvard University PressCambridge MA143170Google Scholar
  13. Vanier, A. 2000.Lacan (Trans., S. Fairfield)Other PressNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  14. Zizek, S. 1992Enjoy your symptom! Jacques Lacan in Hollywood and outRoutledgeNew YorkGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Association for the Advancement of Psychoanalysis 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Tel-Aviv University Tel-AvivIsrael

Personalised recommendations