Characterisation of a new species of Trichodorus Cobb, 1913 (Triplonchida: Trichodoridae) from Iran based on morphological and molecular data
- 69 Downloads
Trichodorus zanjanensis n. sp., collected from the rhizosphere of wild almond tree (Amygdalus scoparia Spach) in Zanjan Province, Iran, is described and illustrated based on morphological and molecular data. The new species is characterised by its body length (772–819 μm in males; 704–953 μm in females), and in having medium-sized onchiostyle (60–64 μm in males; 59–65 μm in females) and a short dorsal overlap of the intestine. Males of the new species have two ventromedian cervical papillae posterior to onchiostyle region, ventrally curved spicules, smooth, long and wide manubrium, gradually continuing in a narrower anterior part of the blade provided with bristles and marked from the wider and transversely striated main part of the blade, tapered towards distal end, three ventromedian precloacal supplements, the posterior one (SP1) situated at the level of anterior blade and gubernaculum situated at 24–25 μm from the cloaca. Females have one pair of sublateral body pores in the vulva region, medium rounded triangular to oval sclerotised vaginal pieces in lateral view, and pear-shaped vagina. The new species resembles T. persicus De Waele & Sturhan, 1987, T. minzi De Waele & Cohn, 1992 and T. taylori De Waele, Mancini, Roca & Lamberti, 1982. The results of morphological and morphometric comparisons and molecular data based on sequences of the partial 18S and D2-D3 expansion segments of 28S rRNA genes, clearly separated T. zanjanensis n. sp. from these known species and supported the description of T. zanjanensis n. sp. as a new species.
We are grateful to University of Zanjan, Zanjan, Iran and Iranian Research Institute of Plant Protection, Tehran, Iran for financial supports.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All applicable institutional, national and international guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed.
- Andrássy, I. (1976). Evolution as a basis for the systematization of nematodes. London, San Francisco & Melbourne: Pitman Publishing, 288 pp.Google Scholar
- Brown, D. J., Zheng, J., & Zhou, X. (2004). Virus vectors. In: Chen, Z. X., Chen, S. Y. & Dickson, D. W. (Eds), Nematology: Advances and perspectives, Volume 2, Nematode management and utilization. Wallingford, UK: CAB International, pp. 717–770.Google Scholar
- Cobb, N. A. (1920). Contributions to a science of nematology, VIII. Baltimore, Maryland: Waverly Press, pp. 213–216.Google Scholar
- Cobb, N. A. (1913). New nematode genera found inhabiting fresh water and non-brackish soils. Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences, 9, 217–343.Google Scholar
- Decraemer, W., & Baujard, P. (1998). A polytomous key for identification of species of the family Trichodoridae Thorne, 1935 (Nematoda: Triplonchida). Fundamental and Applied Nematology, 21, 37–62.Google Scholar
- Decraemer, W., Roca, F., Castillo, P., Pena-Santiago, R., & Gomez-Barcina, A. (1993). Trichodoridae from southern Spain, with description of Trichodorus giennensis n. sp. (Nemata: Trichodoridae). Fundamental and Applied Nematology, 16, 406–416.Google Scholar
- De Ley, P., & Blaxter, M. (2004). A new system for Nematoda: combining morphological characters with molecular trees, and translating clades into ranks and taxa. In: Cook, R. & Hunt, D.J. (Eds) Proceedings of the fourth international congress of nematology, 8–13 June 2002, Tenerife, Spain. Nematology monographs and perspectives 2. Leiden, the Netherlands: Brill, pp. 633–653.Google Scholar
- De Waele, D., Mancini, G., Roca, F., & Lamberti, F. (1982). Trichodorus taylori n. sp. (Nematoda: Dorylaimida) from Italy. Nematologia Mediterranea, 10, 27–37.Google Scholar
- Holterman, M., van der Wurff, A., van den Elsen, S., vanMegen, H., Bongers, T., Holovachov, O., et al. (2006). Phylum-wide analysis of SSU rDNA reveals deep phylogenetic relationships among nematodes and accelerated evolution toward crown clades. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 23, 1792–1800.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- ICZN (2012). International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature: Amendment of articles 8, 9, 10, 21 and 78 of the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature to expand and refine methods of publication. Bulletin of Zoological Nomenclature, 69, 161–169.Google Scholar
- Ilieva-Makulec, K., Rybarczyk-Mydłowska, K., Winiszewska, G., Flis, L., Tereba, A., Kowalewska, K. & Malewski, T. (2017). Morphological and molecular analysis of Paratrichodorus teres (Hooper 1962) (Nematoda: Trichodoridae): a groundwork for discussion on the phylogeny and pathogenicity of Paratrichodorus species. European Journal of Plant Pathology, 148, 907–917.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Jenkins, W. R. (1964). A rapid centrifugal-flotation method for separating nematodes from soil. Plant Disease Reporter, 48, 692.Google Scholar
- Micoletzky, H. (1922). Die freilebende Erd-Nematoden. Archiv für Naturgeschichte, 87, 1-650.Google Scholar
- Rambaut, A., & Drummond, A. J. (2007). Tracer v 1.4, available online at http://beast.bio.ed.ac.uk/Tracer.
- Siddiqi, M. R. (2002). Equadorus equatorius gen. n., sp. n. and Nanidorus mexicanus sp. n. (Nematoda: Trichodoridae). International Journal of Nematology, 12, 197–202.Google Scholar
- Siddiqi, M. R. (1974). Systematics of the genus Trichodorus Cobb, 1913 (Nematoda: Dorylaimida), with descriptions of three new species. Nematologica, 19, 259–278.Google Scholar
- Thorne, G. (1935). Notes on free-living and plant-parasitic nematodes. 11. Proceedings of the Helminthological Society of Washington, 2, 96–98.Google Scholar
- Zhao, Z. Q. (2009). A review of the genus Tripylina Brzeski, 1963 (Nematoda: Triplonchida), with descriptions of five new species from New Zealand. Zootaxa, 2238, 1–24.Google Scholar