Skip to main content
Log in

Illusory checkmates: why chess is not a game

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this essay I argue that chess is not a game. ?I begin by arguing the narrower point that chess is not a game in the sense of 'game' developed by Bernard Suits. ?Chess is not a Suitsian game because chess lacks a prelusory goal. ?Chess lacks a prelusory goal, which is a goal that is identifiable before a game is played, because no checkmate position is knowably achievable before chess is played. ?Checkmate is a postlusory discovery about chess, not a prelusory goal of chess, and chess consequently has more in common with mathematics and physics than it has in common with darts, sprints, and lawn bowling. Various objections are answered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. It should be noted that at the highest levels of chess, checkmate rarely happens in any game, even games that are won. Players can see, based on vast experience, that the position on the board is winning for one side, and the game usually ends with resignation by one of the players before checkmate is even close to being attained.

  2. I am indebted to an anonymous reviewer and to Stuart Rachels, philosopher and former US Chess Champion, for this point. Rachels also made a number of other helpful comments on, and objections to, this paper, especially my definitions of chess terms and my descriptions of chess practice. His generous feedback improved this paper greatly.

References

  • Eales, R. (1985). Chess: The History of a Game. New York/Oxford: Facts on File Publications

    Google Scholar 

  • FIDE (2009). “FIDE Laws of Chess.” https://www.fide.com/FIDE/handbook/LawsOfChess.pdf (Accessed 1 July 2020)

  • Murray, H. J. R. (1913). A History of Chess. Oxford: Clarendon Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, A. J., & Butcher, R. B. (1997). Pre-lusory Goals for Games: A Gambit Declined. Journal of the Philosophy of Sport, 24(1), 38–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shannon, C. (1950). Programming a Computer for Playing Chess. Philosophical Magazine, 41(314), 256–275

    Google Scholar 

  • Suits, B. (1977). Words on Play. Journal of the Philosophy of Sport, 4, 117–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suits, B. (1989). The Trick of the Disappearing Goal. Journal of the Philosophy of Sport, 16, 1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suits, B. (2006). Games and Their Institutions in The Grasshopper. Journal of the Philosophy of Sport, 33(1), 1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suits, B. (2014). The Grasshopper: Games, Life, and Utopia. Third Edition. Peterborough: Broadview Press

  • Vossen, D. P. (2008). “Chess is not a Game.” In Philosophy Looks at Chess, edited by Benjamin Hale, 191–208. Chicago and LaSalle, Illinois: Open Court

  • Zweig, S. (1976). Chess Story. Translated by Joel Rotenberg with an introduction by Peter Gay. New York: New York Review of Books

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Hickson.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author has no financial or non-financial interests to disclose. There are no conflicts of interest related to this research.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hickson, M. Illusory checkmates: why chess is not a game. Synthese 200, 406 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-022-03855-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-022-03855-z

Navigation