Anderson, E. (2004). Uses of value judgments in science: A general argument, with lessons from a case study of feminist research on divorce. Hypatia, 19(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.2004.tb01266.x
Anderson, E. (2016). The social epistemology of morality. In M. Brady & M. Fricker (Eds.), The epistemic lives of groups: Essays in the epistemology of collectives (pp. 75–94). Oxford University Press.
Auletta, K. (1982). The underclass (1st ed.). Random House.
Barber, A. (2013). Science’s immunity to moral refutation. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 91(4), 633–653. https://doi.org/10.1080/00048402.2013.768279
Basl, J., & Coons, C. (2017). Ought to is: The puzzle of moral science. In R. Shafer-Landau (Ed.), Oxford studies in metaethics. Oxford Scholarship.
Bedke, M. (2017). Cognitivism and non-cognitivism. In T. McPherson & D. Plunkett (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of metaethics (pp. 292–307). Routledge.
Bright, L. (2018). Du Bois’ democratic defence of the value free ideal. Synthese, 195(5), 2227–2245.
Brown, J. (2016). Contextualism about evidential support. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 92(2), 329–354. https://doi.org/10.1111/phpr.12164
Brown, M. J. (2013). Values in science beyond underdetermination and inductive risk. Philosophy of Science, 80(5), 829–839. https://doi.org/10.1086/673720
Brown, M. J. (2020). Science and moral imagination: A new ideal for values in science. University of Pittsburgh Press.
Campbell, R. (1998). Illusions of paradox: A feminist epistemology naturalized. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Clough, S. (2003). Beyond epistemology: A pragmatist approach to feminist science studies. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Clough, S. (2011). Radical interpretation, feminism, and science. In J. Malpas (Ed.), Dialogues with Davidson (pp. 405–426). MIT Press.
Crisp, R. (2014). II—Moral testimony pessimism: A defence. Aristotelian Society Supplementary, 88(1), 129–143. https://doi.org/10.1111/supa.2014.88.issue-1
Dorr, C. (2002). Non-cognitivism and wishful thinking. Noûs, 36(1), 97–103. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0068.00362
Douglas, H. (2000). Inductive risk and values in science. Philosophy of Science, 67(4), 559–579. https://doi.org/10.1086/392855
Douglas, H. (2009). Science, policy, and the value-free ideal. University of Pittsburgh Press.
Elliott, K. C. (2017). A tapestry of values: An introduction to values in science. Oxford University Press.
Geertz, C. (1990). A lab of one’s own. New York Review of Books, 37, 19–24.
Gibbard, A. (2003). Thinking how to live. Harvard University Press.
Goldenberg, M. J. (2015). How can feminist theories of evidence assist clinical reasoning and decision-making? Social Epistemology, 29(1), 3–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/02691728.2013.794871
Groll, D., & Decker, J. (2014). Moral testimony: One of these things is just like the others. Analytic Philosophy, 55(1), 54–74. https://doi.org/10.1111/phib.12033
Gross, P., & Levitt, N. (1994). Higher superstition: The academic left and its quarrels with science. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins.
Haack, S. (1993). Epistemological reflections of an old feminist. Reason Papers, 18(fall), 31–43.
Hills, A. (2009). Moral testimony and moral epistemology. Ethics, 120(1), 94–127. https://doi.org/10.1086/648610
Hills, A. (2013). Moral testimony. Philosophy Compass, 8(6), 552–559. https://doi.org/10.1111/phc3.12040
Lackey, J. (2006). It takes two to tango: Beyond reductionism and non-reductionism in the epistemology of testimony. In J. Lackey & E. Sosa (Eds.), The epistemology of testimony (pp. 160–189). Oxford University Press.
Lewis, O. (1959). Five families: Mexican case studies in the culture of poverty. Basic Books.
Lipton, P. (2003). Inference to the best explanation. Routledge.
Longino, H. (1990). Science as social knowledge: Values and objectivity in scientific inquiry. Princeton University Press.
Majors, B. (2007). Moral explanation. Philosophy Compass, 2(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-9991.2006.00049.x
McCain, K. (2013). Explanationist evidentialism. Episteme, 10(3), 299–315. https://doi.org/10.1017/epi.2013.22
McPherson, T. (2012). Ethical non-naturalism and the metaphysics of supervenience. Oxford Studies in Metaethics, 7, 205.
McShane, P. J. (2021). Against epistemic pessimism about moral testimony. Episteme, 18(2), 200–223. https://doi.org/10.1017/epi.2019.11
Mogensen, A. L. (2017). Moral testimony pessimism and the uncertain value of authenticity. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 95(2), 261–284. https://doi.org/10.1111/phpr.12255
Moretti, L., & Piazza, T. (2013). When warrant transmits and when it doesn’t: Towards a general framework. Synthese, 190(13), 2481–2503. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-011-0018-2
Moynihan, D. P. (1965). The Negro family: The case for national action. Office of Policy Planning and Research, U.S. Department of Labor.
Nelson, L. H. (1990). Who knows: From quine to a feminist empiricism. Temple University Press.
Podgorski, A. (2020). Normative uncertainty and the dependence problem. Mind, 129(513), 43–70. https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/fzz048
Rosen, G. (2017). Metaphysical relations in metaethics. In T. McPherson & D. Plunkett (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of metaethics (pp. 151–169). Routledge.
Sliwa, P. (2012). In defense of moral testimony. Philosophical Studies, 158(2), 175–195. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-012-9887-6
Small, M. L., Harding, D., & Lamont, M. (2010). Reconsidering culture and poverty. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 629, 1.
Solomon, M. (2012). The web of valief: An assessment of feminist radical empiricism. In S. L. Crasnow & A. M. Superson (Eds.), Out from the shadows: Analytical feminist contributions to traditional philosophy. Oxford University Press.
Steinberg, S. (2011, January 13). Poor Reason: Culture still doesn’t explain poverty. Boston Review. Retrieved 11 April, 2022, from https://bostonreview.net/articles/steinberg-php/
Stewart, A., Copeland, A., Chester, N., Malley, J., & Barenbaum, N. (1997). Separating together: How divorce transforms families. Guilford Press.
Toole, B. (2021). Recent work in standpoint epistemology. Analysis, 81(2), 338–350. https://doi.org/10.1093/analys/anab026
Tucker, C. (2010). When transmission fails. Philosophical Review, 119(4), 497–529. https://doi.org/10.1215/00318108-2010-012
Werner, P. J. (2020). Moral perception. Philosophy Compass. https://doi.org/10.1111/phc3.12640
White, M. G. (1981). What is and what ought to be done: An essay on ethics and epistemology. Oxford University Press.
Wiland, E. (2021). Guided by voices: Moral testimony, advice, and forging a “we.” Oxford University Press.
Williamson, T. (2000). Knowledge and its limits. Oxford University Press.
Wright, C. (2002). (Anti-)sceptics simple and subtle: G. E. Moore and John McDowell. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 65(2), 330–348. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1933-1592.2002.tb00205.x