Alston, W. P. (1988). The deontological conception of epistemic justification. Philosophical Perspectives, 2, 257–299.
Barrett, J., & Zollman, K. J. S. (2009). The role of forgetting in the evolution and learning of language. Journal of Experimental & Theoretical Artificial Intelligence, 21(4), 293–309.
Bernecker, S. (2018). On the blameworthiness of forgetting. In K. Michaelian, D. Debus, & D. Perrin (Eds.), New directions in the philosophy of memory. Abingdon: Routledge.
Bernecker, S., & Grundmann, T. (2019). Knowledge from forgetting. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 98(3), 525–540.
Betz, G. (2012). Debate dynamics: How controversy improves our beliefs (Vol. 357). Berlin: Springer.
Cruz, M. G., Boster, F. J., & Rodriguez, J. I. (1997). The impact of group size and proportion of shared information on the exchange and integration of information in groups. Communication Research, 24, 291–313.
Fagin, R., & Halpern, J. (1988). Belief, awareness, and limited reasoning. Artificial Intelligence, 34(1), 39–76.
Feldman, R. (2000). The ethics of belief. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 60(3), 667–695.
Fischer, J. M., & Ravizza, M. (1998). Responsibility and control: A theory of moral responsibility. Cambridge University Press.
Ginet, C. (2001). Deciding to believe. In M. Steup (Ed.), Knowledge, truth and duty (pp. 63–76). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Goldman, A. I. (1999). Knowledge in a social world. Oxford University Press.
Halpern, J. Y. & Pass, R. (2010). I don’t want to think about it now: Decision theory with costly computation. In Twelfth international conference on the principles of knowledge representation and reasoning.
Halpern, J. Y., Pass, R., & Seeman, L. (2014). Decision theory with resource-bounded agents. Topics In Cognitive Science, 6(2), 245–257.
Hieronymi, P. (2006). Controlling attitudes. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 87, 45–74.
Hill, B. (2010). Awareness dynamics. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 39, 113–137.
Lumet, S. (Director), Fonda, H., Rose, R. (Producers), Rose, R., & Hopkins, K. (Writers). (1956). 12 angry men [Motion picture]. United States: United Artists Corp.
Mayo-Wilson, C., Zollman, Kevin J. S., & Danks, D. (2011). The independence thesis: When individual and social epistemology diverge. Philosophy of Science, 78(4), 653–677.
McHugh, C. (2012). Epistemic deontology and voluntariness. Erkenntnis, 77(1), 65–94.
Moss, S. (2015). Time-slice epistemology and action under indeterminacy. In T. S. Gendler & J. Hawthorne (Eds.), Oxford studies in epistemology (pp. 172–194). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Peels, R. (2017). Responsible belief: A theory in ethics and epistemology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ryan, S. (2003). Doxastic compatibilism and the ethics of belief. Philosophical Studies, 114, 47–79.
Schwarz, W. (2017). Evidentialism and conservatism in bayesian epistemology. Unpublished. https://www.umsu.de/papers/conservatism.pdf. Accessed 31 Oct 2018.
Singer, D. J. (2018). How to be an epistemic consequentialist. Philosophical Quarterly, 68(272), 580–602.
Singer, D. J., Bramson, A., Grim, P., Holman, B., Jung, J., Kovaka, K., et al. (2019). Rational social and political polarization. Philosophical Studies, 176, 2243.
Smith, A. M. (2005). Responsibility for attitudes: Activity and passivity in mental life. Ethics, 115, 236–271.
Stasser, G., & Titus, W. (1985). Pooling of unshared information in group decision making: Biased information sampling during discussions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 1467–1478.
Stasser, G., & Titus, W. (1987). Effects of information load and percentage of shared information on the dissemination of unshared information during group discussion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 81–93.
Steup, M. (2008). Doxastic freedom. Synthese, 161, 375–392.
Steup, M. (2011). Belief, voluntariness and intentionality. Dialectica, 65(4), 537–559.
Sunstein, C. (2002). The law of group polarization. Journal of Political Philosophy, 10(2), 175–195.
Sunstein, C., & Hastie, R. (2014). Making dumb groups smarter. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2014/12/making-dumb-groups-smarter. Accessed 15 Apr 2018.
Vahid, H. (1998). Deontic vs. nondeontic conceptions of epistemic justification. Erkenntnis, 49(3), 285–301.
van Benthem, J. (2011). Logical dynamics of information and interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
van Benthem, J., & Velázquez-Quesada, F. R. (2010). The dynamics of awareness. Synthese, 177(1), 5–27.
Van Ditmarsch, H., Herzig, A., Lang, J., & Marquis, P. (2009). Introspective forgetting. Synthese, 169(2), 405–423.
Vineberg, S. (Spring 2016 Edition). Dutch book arguments. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2016/entries/dutch-book/. Accessed 30 Apr 2018.
Weatherson, B. (2008). Deontology and Descartes’ demon. Journal of Philosophy, 105, 540–569.
Williamson, T. (2000). Knowledge and its Limits. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wilson, A. (2014). Bounded memory and biases in information processing. Econometrica, 82(6), 2257–2294.
Wittenbaum, G. M., Hollingshead, A. B., & Botero, I. C. (2004). From cooperative to motivated information sharing in groups: Moving beyond the hidden profile paradigm. Communication Monographs, 71(3), 286–310.
Zollman, K. J. (2007). The communication structure of epistemic communities. Philosophy of Science, 74(5), 574–587.