Advertisement

Synthese

pp 1–23 | Cite as

A pluralistic and socially responsible philosophy of epidemiology field should actively engage with social determinants of health and health disparities

  • Sean A. VallesEmail author
S.I. : Philosophy of Epidemiology

Abstract

Philosophy of epidemiology has recently emerged as a distinct branch of philosophy. The field will surely benefit from pluralism, reflected in the broad range of topics and perspectives in this special issue. Here, I argue that a healthy pluralistic field of philosophy of epidemiology has social responsibilities that require the field as a whole (not any individual work therein) to engage actively with research on social determinants of health and health disparities. Practicing epidemiologists and the broader community of public health scientists have gradually acknowledged that much of their attention ought to be paid to these, i.e. inequitable between-population health variations that largely reflect the world’s inequitable distribution of resources and social conditions. The paper illustrates how and why health disparities and social determinants of health, through no ill will, become de facto secondary concerns in Alex Broadbent’s field-defining Philosophy of Epidemiology, showing the ease with which these topics can be incidentally sidelined. As means for philosophy of epidemiology to meet its social responsibility obligations, I suggest philosophy of epidemiology expand its attention to two particular lines research. First, the paper discusses Geoffrey Rose’s concept of “causes of incidence”—causes of disparities between populations—and argues for the importance of engaging with these causes. Second, the paper argues for the value of engaging with Bruce Link and Jo Phelan’s “fundamental causes” model of how flexible social resources (money, prestige, etc.) serve as buffers from harms, generating a plethora of shifting and locally-contingent health effects.

Keywords

Causes of incidence Fundamental cause Philosophy of epidemiology Population health Social determinants of health 

Notes

References

  1. American Heart Association. (2012). Bridging the gap: CVD and health equity. Washington, D.C.: American Heart Association.Google Scholar
  2. Battersby, M. (2008). Applied epistemology and argumentation in epidemiology. Informal Logic, 26, 41–62.Google Scholar
  3. Biddle, J. B., & Kukla, R. (2017). The geography of epistemic risk. In K. C. Elliott & T. Richards (Eds.), Exploring inductive risk: Case studies of values in science (pp. 215–238). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Broadbent, A. (2009). Causation and models of disease in epidemiology. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 40, 302–311.Google Scholar
  5. Broadbent, A. (2011). Epidemiological evidence in proof of specific causation. Legal Theory, 17(4), 237–278.Google Scholar
  6. Broadbent, A. (2013). Philosophy of epidemiology. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  7. Broadbent, A. (2014). Disease as a theoretical concept: The case of “HPV-itis”. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 48, 250–257.Google Scholar
  8. Chetty, R., Stepner, M., Abraham, S., et al. (2016). The association between income and life expectancy in the United States, 2001–2014. Journal of the American Medical Association, 315, 1750–1766.Google Scholar
  9. Commission on Equity and Health Inequalities in the Americas. (2018) Just societies, health equity, and dignified lives. Pan American Health Organization http://iris.paho.org/xmlui/handle/123456789/49505. Accessed 15 Feb 2019.
  10. Commission on Social Determinants of Health. (2008). Closing the gap in a generation: Health equity through action on the social determinants of health. Geneva: World Health Organization.Google Scholar
  11. Cranor, C. F. (1997). Regulating toxic substances: A philosophy of science and the law. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Cranor, C. F. (2017). Tragic failures: How and why we are harmed by toxic chemicals. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Dammann, O. (2009). Risk, predictability and biomedical neo-pragmatism. Acta Paediatrica, 98, 1093–1095.Google Scholar
  14. Dammann, O. (2017). The etiological stance: Explaining illness occurrence. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 60, 151–165.Google Scholar
  15. Dammann, O. (2018). Hill’s heuristics and explanatory coherentism in epidemiology. American Journal of Epidemiology, 187, 1–6.Google Scholar
  16. De Vreese, L. (2009). Epidemiology and causation. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, 12, 345–353.Google Scholar
  17. Dicker, D., Nguyen, G., Abate, D., et al. (2018). Global, regional, and national age-sex-specific mortality and life expectancy, 1950–2017: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. The Lancet, 392, 1684–1735.Google Scholar
  18. Dowdy, D. W., & Pai, M. (2012). Bridging the gap between knowledge and health: The epidemiologist as Accountable Health Advocate (“AHA!”). Epidemiology, 23, 914–918.Google Scholar
  19. Dragulinescu, S. (2017). Mechanisms and difference-making. Acta Analytica, 32, 29–54.Google Scholar
  20. Durante, A. J., & Gregorio, D. I. (2016). A thoughtful, comprehensive overview of our field. American Journal of Public Health, 106, 1720–1721.Google Scholar
  21. FAO, IFAD, UNICEF, et al. (2017). The state of food security and nutrition in the world 2017. Rome: FAO.Google Scholar
  22. Fehr, C., & Plaisance, K. S. (2010). Socially relevant philosophy of science: An introduction. Synthese, 177, 301–316.Google Scholar
  23. Freese, J., & Lutfey, K. (2011). Fundamental causality: Challenges of an animating concept for medical sociology. In B. A. Pescosolido, J. K. Martin, J. D. McLeod, et al. (Eds.), Handbook of the sociology of health, illness, and healing (pp. 67–81). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  24. Frohlich, K. L., & Potvin, L. (2008). Transcending the known in public health practice—The inequality paradox: The population approach and vulnerable populations. American Journal of Public Health, 98, 216–221.Google Scholar
  25. Galea, S. (2017). Making epidemiology matter. International Journal of Epidemiology, 46, 1083–1085.Google Scholar
  26. Galea, S. (2018). Healthier: Fifty thoughts on the foundations of population health. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Goldberg, D. S. (2014). The implications of fundamental cause theory for priority setting. American Journal of Public Health, 104, 1839–1843.Google Scholar
  28. Goldberg, D. S. (2017). Public health ethics and the social determinants of health. Cham: Springer.Google Scholar
  29. Gottlieb, L., Glymour, M. M., Kersten, E., et al. (2016). Challenges to an integrated population health research agenda: Targets, scale, tradeoffs and timing. Social Science and Medicine, 150, 279–285.Google Scholar
  30. Hadler, J. L., Yousey-Hindes, K., Pérez, A., et al. (2016). Influenza-related hospitalizations and poverty levels—United States, 2010–2012. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 65, 101–105.Google Scholar
  31. Hatzenbuehler, M. L., Phelan, J. C., & Link, B. G. (2013). Stigma as a fundamental cause of population health inequalities. American Journal of Public Health, 103, 813–821.Google Scholar
  32. Hill, A. B. (1965). The environment and disease: Association or causation? Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine, 58, 295–300.Google Scholar
  33. John, S. D. (2014). Risk, contractualism, and Rose’s “prevention paradox”. Social Theory and Practice, 40, 28–50.Google Scholar
  34. Katikireddi, S. V., & Valles, S. A. (2015). Coupled ethical-epistemic analysis of public health research and practice: Categorizing variables to improve population health and equity. American Journal of Public Health, 105, e36–e42.Google Scholar
  35. Kaufman, J. S., Dolman, L., Rushani, D., & Cooper, R. S. (2015). The contribution of genomic research to explaining racial disparities in cardiovascular disease: A systematic review. American Journal of Epidemiology, 181, 464–472.Google Scholar
  36. Keyes, K. M., & Galea, S. (2016). Population health science. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Krieger, N. (1994). Epidemiology and the web of causation: Has anyone seen the spider? Social Science and Medicine, 39, 887–903.Google Scholar
  38. Krieger, N. (2008). Proximal, distal, and the politics of causation: What’s level got to do with it? American Journal of Public Health, 98, 221–230.Google Scholar
  39. Krieger, N. (2011). Epidemiology and the People’s Health: Theory and context. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Krieger, N. (2017). Health equity and the fallacy of treating causes of population health as if they sum to 100%. American Journal of Public Health, 107, 541–549.Google Scholar
  41. Krieger, N., & Davey Smith, G. (2016). The tale wagged by the DAG: Broadening the scope of causal inference and explanation for epidemiology. International Journal of Epidemiology, 45, 1787–1808.Google Scholar
  42. Link, B. G., & Phelan, J. (1995). Social conditions as fundamental causes of disease. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 35, 80–94.Google Scholar
  43. Manyanga, T., El-Sayed, H., Doku, D. T., & Randall, J. R. (2014). The prevalence of underweight, overweight, obesity and associated risk factors among school-going adolescents in seven African countries. BMC Public Health, 14, 1.Google Scholar
  44. Masters, R. K., Link, B. G., & Phelan, J. C. (2015). Trends in education gradients of ‘preventable’ mortality: A test of fundamental cause theory. Social Science and Medicine, 127, 19–28.Google Scholar
  45. McHugh, N. A. (2015). The limits of knowledge: Generating pragmatist feminist cases for situated knowing. Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
  46. McKeown, R. E., Weed, D. L., Kahn, J. P., & Stoto, M. A. (2003). American College of Epidemiology ethics guidelines: Foundations and dissemination. Science and Engineering Ethics, 9, 207–214.Google Scholar
  47. Miettinen, O. S. (2017). On progress in epidemiologic academia. European Journal of Epidemiology, 32, 173–179.Google Scholar
  48. Mitchell, S. D. (2002). Integrative pluralism. Biology and Philosophy, 17, 55–70.Google Scholar
  49. Nguyen, B. T., Shuval, K., Bertmann, F., & Yaroch, A. L. (2015). The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, food insecurity, dietary quality, and obesity among US adults. American Journal of Public Health, 105, 1453–1459.Google Scholar
  50. Paradies, Y., Ben, J., Denson, N., et al. (2015). Racism as a determinant of health: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE, 10, e0138511.Google Scholar
  51. Phelan, J. C., & Link, B. G. (2015). Is racism a fundamental cause of inequalities in health? Annual Review of Sociology, 41, 311–330.Google Scholar
  52. Phelan, J. C., Link, B. G., & Tehranifar, P. (2010). Social conditions as fundamental causes of health inequalities: Rheory, evidence, and policy implications. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 51, S28–S40.Google Scholar
  53. Plutynski, A. (2018). Explaining cancer: Finding order in disorder. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  54. Powers, M., & Faden, R. R. (2006). Social justice: The Moral Foundations of Public Health and Health Policy. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  55. Price, A. L., Spencer, C. C. A., & Donnelly, P. (2015). Progress and promise in understanding the genetic basis of common diseases. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, Biological Sciences, 282, 20151684.Google Scholar
  56. Public Health Leadership Society. (2002). Principles of the ethical practice of public health. https://www.apha.org/-/media/files/pdf/membergroups/ethics/ethics_brochure.ashx. Accessed 1 Oct 2018.
  57. Quillian, L., Pager, D., Hexel, O., & Midtbøen, A. H. (2017). Meta-analysis of field experiments shows no change in racial discrimination in hiring over time. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114, 10870–10875.Google Scholar
  58. Reiss, J. (2015). A pragmatist theory of evidence. Philosophy of Science, 82, 341–362.Google Scholar
  59. Rose, G. (1985). Sick individuals and sick populations. International Journal of Epidemiology, 14, 32–38.Google Scholar
  60. Rose, G. (1992). The strategy of preventive medicine. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  61. Russo, F. (2009). Variational causal claims in epidemiology. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 52, 540–554.Google Scholar
  62. Russo, F., & Williamson, J. (2007). Interpreting causality in the health sciences. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 21, 157–170.Google Scholar
  63. Shrader-Frechette, K. (2002). Environmental justice: Creating quality, reclaiming democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  64. Shrader-Frechette, K. (2013). Environmental injustice inherent in radiation dose standards. Radioactivity in the Environment, 19, 197–213.Google Scholar
  65. Spencer, E. (2018). Conceptual clarification and implicit-association tests: Psychometric evidence for racist attitudes. European Journal for Philosophy of Science, 8, 51–70.Google Scholar
  66. Stegenga, J. (2011). Is meta-analysis the platinum standard of evidence? Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 42, 497–507.Google Scholar
  67. Valles, S. A. (2018). Philosophy of population health: philosophy for a new public health era. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  68. Van Norden, B. W. (2017). Taking back philosophy: A multicultural manifesto. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  69. Vandenbroucke, J. P., Broadbent, A., & Pearce, N. (2016). Causality and causal inference in epidemiology: The need for a pluralistic approach. International Journal of Epidemiology, 45, 1776–1786.Google Scholar
  70. Ward, A. (2007). The social epidemiologic concept of fundamental cause. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics, 28, 465–485.Google Scholar
  71. Weber, E., & De Vreese, L. (2017). Comparative causation at multiple levels and across scientific disciplines. Axiomathes, 27, 667–683.Google Scholar
  72. Woodward, J. (2010). Causation in biology: Stability, specificity, and the choice of levels of explanation. Biology and Philosophy, 25, 287–318.Google Scholar
  73. World Health Organization. (2016a). Global tuberculosis report 2016. World Health Organization http://www.who.int/tb/publications/global_report/en/. Accessed 15 Feb 2019.
  74. World Health Organization. (2016b). Tuberculosis. http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs104/en/. Accessed 15 Feb 2019.
  75. World Health Organization. (2017). Global tuberculosis report 2017. World Health Organization. http://www.who.int/tb/publications/global_report/en/. Accessed 15 Feb 2019.
  76. Yen, J., Durrheim, K., & Tafarodi, R. W. (2018). ‘I’m happy to own my implicit biases’: Public encounters with the implicit association test. British Journal of Social Psychology, 57, 505–523.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Lyman Briggs CollegeMichigan State UniversityEast LansingUSA
  2. 2.Department of PhilosophyMichigan State UniversityEast LansingUSA

Personalised recommendations