pp 1–22 | Cite as

Implicit attitudes and awareness



I offer here a new hypothesis about the nature of implicit attitudes. Psychologists and philosophers alike often distinguish implicit from explicit attitudes by maintaining that we are aware of the latter, but not aware of the former. Recent experimental evidence, however, seems to challenge this account. It would seem, for example, that participants are frequently quite adept at predicting their own performances on measures of implicit attitudes. I propose here that most theorists in this area have nonetheless overlooked a commonsense distinction regarding how we can be aware of attitudes, a difference that fundamentally distinguishes implicit and explicit attitudes. Along the way, I discuss the implications that this distinction may hold for future debates about and experimental investigations into the nature of implicit attitudes.


Implicit attitudes Awareness Consciousness Belief 



I thank Ralph Baergen, Zac Gershberg, Rocco Gennaro, Neil Levy, Eric Mandelbaum, Myrto Mylopoulos, Bence Nanay, Jake Quilty-Dunn, Evan Rodriguez, James Skidmore, Brent Strickland, two referees for this journal, as well as the audiences at the Conference on Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Moral Responsibility at Utah Valley University in March 2015, the Anthropology Department Colloquium at Idaho State University in April 2015, and the 2017 Meeting of the Southern Society for Philosophy and Psychology for their helpful discussions of these issues or comments on previous drafts of this material.


  1. Amodio, D., & Devine, P. (2006). Stereotyping and evaluation in implicit race bias: Evidence for independent constructs and unique effects on behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91(4), 652–661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bem, D. J., & McConnell, H. K. (1970). Testing the self-perception explanation of dissonance phenomena: On the salience of premanipulation atttitudes. Jounal of Personality and Social Psychology, 14(1), 23–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Block, N. (2009). Comparing the major theories of consciousness. In M. Gazzaniga (Ed.), The cognitive neurosciences IV (pp. 1111–1121). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bosson, J. K., Swann, W. B., & Pennebaker, J. W. (2000). Stalking the perfect measure of implicit self-esteem: The blind men and the elephant revisited? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 631–643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brownstein, M. (2016). Attributionism and moral responsibility for implicit bias. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 7(4), 765–786.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brownstein, M., & Saul, J. (Eds.). (2016). Implicit bias and philosophy: Volumes I & II. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Carruthers, P. (2018). Implicit versus explicit attitudes: Differing manifestations of the same representational structures? Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 9(1), 51–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chris, S. A., & Woodyard, H. D. (1973). Self-perception and characteristics of premanipulation attitudes: A test of Bem’stheory. Memory & Cognition, 1(3), 229–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cooley, E., Payne, B. K., Loersch, C., & Lei, R. (2015). Who owns implicit attitudes? Testing a metacognitive perspective. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41(1), 103–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. De Houwer, J. (2014). A propositional model of implicit evaluation. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 8, 342–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Descartes, R. (1988). Descartes: Selected Philosophical Writings. J. Cottingham, R. Stoothoff, & D. Murdoch (Ed. & Tr.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Deutsch, R., Gawronski, B., & Strack, F. (2006). At the boundaries of automaticity: Negation as reflective operation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 385–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dunham, Y., Baron, A. S., & Banaji, M. R. (2008). The development of implicit intergroup cognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12(7), 248–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Egan, A. (2008). Seeing and believing: Perception, belief formation, and the divided mind. Philosophical Studies, 140(1), 47–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Egan, A. (2011). Comments on Gendler’s ‘The epistemic costs of implicit bias’. Philosophical Studies, 156, 65–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fazio, R. H. (1990). Multiple processes by which attitudes guide behavior: The MODE model as an integrative framework. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 23, 75–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Freud, S. (1949). An outline of psycho-analysis. New York: W. W. Company.Google Scholar
  19. Gawronski, B., & Bodenhausen, G. V. (2011). The associative-propositional evaluation model: Theory, evidence, and open questions. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 59–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gawronski, B., Hofmann, W., & Wilbur, C. (2006). Are “implicit” attitudes unconscious? Consciousness and Cognition, 15, 485–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gawronski, B., & Payne, B. K. (Eds.). (2010). Handbook of implicit social cognition: Measurement, theory, and applications. New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  22. Gendler, T. S. (2008). Alief and belief. Journal of Philosophy, 105(10), 634–663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Goldhill, O. (2017). The world is relying on a flawed psychological test to fight racism. Quartz. 3 December. Online:
  24. Greenwald, A. G., Banaji, M. R., & Nosek, B. A. (2015). Statistically small effects of the Implicit Association Test can have societally large effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 108, 553–561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Greenwald, A. G., McGhee, D. E., & Schwartz, J. K. L. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1464–1480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gregg, A., Seibt, B., & Banaji, M. (2006). Easier done than undone: Asymmetry in the malleability of implicit preferences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(1), 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hahn, A., Judd, C. M., Hirsh, H. K., & Blair, I. V. (2014). Awareness of implicit attitudes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(3), 1369–1392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Haidt, J., & Hersh, M. A. (2001). Sexual morality: The cultures and emotions of conservatives and liberals. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 31(1), 191–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hofmann, W., Gawronski, B., Gschwendner, T., Le, H., & Schmitt, M. (2005). A meta-analysis on the correlation between the implicit association test and explicit self-report measures. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 1369–1385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Holroyd, J. (2012). Responsibility for implicit bias. Journal of Social Philosophy, 43(3), 274–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Holroyd, J. (2015). Implicit bias, awareness and imperfect cognitions. Consciousness and Cognition, 33, 511–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Johnson, C. (2013). Everyone is biased: Harvard professor’s work reveals I barely know my own minds. The Boston Globe. Online: Accessed Feb. 2016.
  33. King, M., & Carruthers, P. (2012). Consciousness and moral responsibility. Journal of Moral Philosophy, 9, 200–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kriegel, U. (2009). Subjective consciousness: A self-representational theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Levy, N. (2014a). Consciousness, implicit attitudes and moral responsibility. Noûs, 48(1), 21–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Levy, N. (2014b). Consciousness and moral responsibility. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Levy, N. (2015). Neither fish nor fowl: Implicit attitudes as patchy endorsements. Noûs, 49(4), 800–823.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lewis, D. (1982). Logic for equivocators. Noûs, 16(3), 431–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Machery, E. (2016). DeFreuding implicit attitudes. In M. Brownstein & J. Saul (Eds.), Implicit bias & philosophy (Vol. I, pp. 104–129). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Madva, A. (2016). Why implicit attitudes are (probably) not beliefs. Synthese, 193(8), 2659–2684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Mandelbaum, E. (2014). Thinking is believing. Inquiry, 57(1), 55–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Mandelbaum, E. (2016). Attitude, inference, association: On the propositional structure of implicit bias. Noûs, 50(3), 629–658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Monteith, M. J., Voils, C. I., & Ashburn-Nardo, L. (2001). Taking a look underground: Detecting, interpreting and reacting to implicit racial biases. Social Cognition, 19(4), 395–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Nier, J. A. (2005). How dissociated are implicit and explicit racial attitudes? A bogus pipeline approach. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 8, 39–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Nisbett, R. E., & Wilson, T. D. (1977). Telling more than I can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. Psychological Review, 84, 231–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Nosek, B. A. (2007). Implicit-explicit relationships. Current Directions in Psychological Sciences, 16(2), 65–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Payne, B. K. (2001). Prejudice and perception: The role of automatic and controlled processes in misperceiving a weapon. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 181–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Prinz, J. J. (2004). Gut reactions: A Perceptual theory of emotion. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  49. Quilty-Dunn, J. (2015). Believing in perceiving: Known illusions and the classical dual-component theory. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 96(4), 550–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Ranganath, K., Smith, C., & Nosek, B. (2008). Distinguishing automatic and controlled components of attitudes from direct and indirect measurement methods. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 386–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Rosenthal, D. M. (2005). Consciousness and mind. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  52. Saul, J. (2013). Unconscious influences and women in philosophy. In F. Jenkins & K. Hutchison (Eds.), Women in philosophy: What needs to change? (pp. 39–60). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Schwitzgebel, E. (2010). Acting contrary to our professed beliefs or the gulf between occurrent judgment and dispositional belief. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 91(4), 531–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Strawson, G. (1994). Mental reality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  55. Sullivan-Bissett, E. (2015). Implicit bias, confabulation, and epistemic innocence. Consciousness and Cognition, 33, 548–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Uhlmann, E. L., & Cohen, G. L. (2005). Constructed criteria: Redefining merit to justify discrimination. Psychological Science, 16, 474–480.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of English and PhilosophyIdaho State UniversityPocatelloUSA

Personalised recommendations