Synthese

pp 1–19 | Cite as

Kant on cognition and knowledge

Mini-Symposium on Kant and Cognition

Abstract

Even though Kant’s theory of cognition (Erkenntnis) is central to his Critique of Pure Reason, it has rarely been asked what exactly Kant means by the term “cognition”. Against the widespread assumption that cognition (in the most relevant sense of that term) can be identified with knowledge or if not, that knowledge is at least a species of cognition, we argue that the concepts of cognition and knowledge in Kant are not only distinct, but even disjunct. To show this, we first (I) investigate Kant’s explicit characterizations of the nature of cognition. As it turns out, he introduces several different notions that must be carefully distinguished before identifying the one that is central to his project in the first Critique. We then (II) consider the basic features of Kant’s conception of knowledge, indicating both how it involves assent and objective justification and how it relates to our contemporary conception. Next (III), we compare and contrast Kant’s understanding of cognition and his conception of knowledge in a way that allows us to present their fundamental differences and connections. We argue that while cognition, in the most relevant sense, is a species of representation that differs from other representations in that it involves the conceptual determination of a sensibly given object, knowledge (for Kant) is a kind of assent to a judgment that requires consciousness of a sufficient epistemic ground. Finally (IV), by appreciating the differences between cognition and knowledge, we explain several of the implications this conception of cognition has for some of Kant’s main claims in the Critique of Pure Reason as a whole. Among other things, we show how Kant can deny cognition of specific things in themselves while allowing philosophical knowledge about things in themselves in general (e.g. that they exist, are not in space and time, etc.).

Keywords

Kant Cognition Knowledge Representation Assent 

References

  1. Allison, H. (2004). Kant’s transcendental idealism (2nd ed.). New Haven/London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Burge, T. (2010). The origins of objectivity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Burge, T. (2013). Cognition through understanding: Self-knowledge, interlocution, reasoning, reflection: philosophical essays (Vol. 3). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Carriero, J. (2013). Epistemology Past and Present. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 113, 175–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chignell, A. (2007). Kant’s concepts of justification. Nous, 41, 33–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chignell, A. (2014). Modal motives for noumenal ignorance: Knowledge, cognition, coherence. Kant-Studien, 105, 573–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Engstrom, S. (2009). The form of practical knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Grüne, S. (2009). Blinde Anschauung. Zur Rolle von Begriffen in Kants Theorie sinnlicher Synthesis. Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann.Google Scholar
  9. Guyer, P. (1987). Kant and the claims of knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Henrich, D. (1973). Die Beweisstruktur von Kants Transzendentaler Deduktion. In G. Prauss (Ed.), Kant. Zur Deutung seiner Theorie von Erkennen und Handeln (pp. 93–104). Köln: Kiepenheuer und Witsch.Google Scholar
  11. Kain, P. (2010). Practical cognition, intuition, and the fact of reason. In J. Krueger & B. Lipscomb (Eds.), Kant’s moral metaphysics (pp. 211–230). Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  12. McDowell, J. (1994). Mind and world. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  13. McDowell, J. (2009). Having the world in view: Essays on Kant, Hegel, and Sellars. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  14. McDowell, J. (2011). Tyler Burge on disjunctivism. Philosophical Explorations, 13, 243–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Meier, G.F. (1752). Auszug aus der Vernunftlehre. Halle: Johann Justinius Gebauer.Google Scholar
  16. Pasternack, L. (2011). Kant’s Doctrinal Belief in God. In O. Thorndike (Ed.), Rethinking Kant (Vol. 3). Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
  17. Schafer, K. (2013, November). Kant’s conception of cognition and our knowledge of things-in-themselves (unpublished manuscript).Google Scholar
  18. Tolley, C. (2013, January 28). Kant’s use of Erkenntnis in its historical context (unpublished manuscript).Google Scholar
  19. Watkins, E., & Willaschek, M. (2017a). Kant’s account of cognition. Journal of the History of Philosophy, 55, 83–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Watkins, E., & Willaschek, M. (2017b). Givenness and cognition: Reply to Grüne and Chignell. Journal of the History of Philosophy, 55, 143–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institut für PhilosophieJohann Wolfgang Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am MainFrankfurt am MainGermany
  2. 2.Philosophy DepartmentUniversity of California, San DiegoLa JollaUSA

Personalised recommendations