Andriani, P. (2017). Exaptation, serendipity and aging. Mechanisms of Ageing and Development, 163(April), 30–35.
Anjum, R. L., & Mumford, S. (2017). Emergence and demergence. In M. Paulini, P. Orilia, & F. Orilia (Eds.), Philosophical and scientific perspectives on downward causation (pp. 92–109). New York: Routledge.
Austin, J. H. (2003). Chase, chance, and creativity: The lucky art of novelty. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Barber, B., & Fox, R. C. (1958). The case of the floppy-eared rabbits: An instance of serendipity gained and serendipity lost. American Journal of Sociology, 64(2), 128–136.
Baumeister, A. A., Hawkins, M. F., & López-Muñoz, F. (2010). Toward standardized usage of the word serendipity in the historiography of psychopharmacology. Journal of the History of the Neurosciences, 19, 253–270.
Bedessem, B. & Ruphy, S. (2016). Serendipity: An argument for scientific freedom? Presented to the Philosophy of Science Association, Atlanta (November). http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/12508/. Accessed 14 July 2017.
Boyer, T. (2014). Is a bird in the hand worth two in the bush? Or, whether scientists should publish intermediate results. Synthese, 191, 17–35.
Bush, V. (1945). Science: The endless frontier. Washington DC: United States Government Printing Office.
Chalmers, D. (2006). Strong and weak emergence. In P. Clayton & P. Davies (Eds.), The re-emergence of emergence (pp. 244–254). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Clayton, P. (2006). Conceptual foundations of emergence theory. In P. Clayton & P. Davies (Eds.), The re-emergence of emergence (pp. 1–31). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Copeland, S. M. (2015). The case of the triggered memory: Serendipitous discovery and the ethics of clinical research. Dalhousie University (Ph.D. Thesis).
Cunha, M. P. E. (2005). Serendipity: Why some organizations are luckier than others. SSRN Electronic Journal. doi:10.2139/ssrn.882782.
Cunha, M. P. E., Clegg, S. R., & Mendonça, S. (2010). On serendipity and organizing. European Management Journal, 28, 319–330.
Cunha, M. P., Rego, A., Clegg, S., & Lindsay, G. (2015). The dialectics of serendipity. European Management Journal, 33, 9–18.
Darbellay, F., Moody, Z., Sedooka, A., & Steffen, G. (2014). Interdisciplinary research boosted by serendipity. Creativity Research Journal, 26(1), 1–10.
de Rond, M. & Morley, I. (2010). Introduction: Fortune and the prepared mind. In M. de Rond & I. Morley (Eds.), Serendipity: Fortune and the prepared mind (pp. 1–10). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
de Rond, M. (2014). The structure of serendipity. Culture and Organization, 20(5), 342–358.
Diggins, F. W. E. (1999). The true history of the discovery of penicillin, with refutation of the misinformation in the literature. British Journal of Biomedical Science, 56, 83–93.
Erdelez, S. (1997). Information encountering: A conceptual framework for accidental information discovery. In ISIC ’96 Proceedings of an international conference on Information seeking in context (pp. 412–421). London, UK: Taylor Graham Publishing.
Estes, J. (2016). Serendipity: An ecologist’s quest to understand nature. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Fine, G. A., & Deegan, J. G. (1996). Three principles of Serendip: Insight, chance, and discovery in qualitative research. Qualitative Studies in Education, 9(4), 434–447.
Fleck, L. (1979). Genesis and development of a scientific fact. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Fleming, S. A. (1945). Nobel lecture: Penicillin. Nobel Lectures, Physiology or Medicine, 1942–1962, 83–93.
Foster, A. E., & Ellis, D. (2014). Serendipity and its study. Journal of Documentation, 70(6), 1015–1038.
Gest, H. (1997). Serendipity in scientific discovery: A closer look. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 41(1), 21–28.
Gibbons, M. (2012). Reassessing discovery: Rosalind Franklin, scientific visualization, and the structure of DNA. Philosophy of Science, 79, 63–80.
Heesen, R. (forthcoming). Communism and the incentive to share in science. Philosophy of Science. doi:10.1086/693875.
Kantorovich, A. (1993). Scientific discovery: Logic and tinkering. New York: SUNY Press.
Kefalidou, G., & Sharples, S. (2016). Encouraging serendipity in research: Designing technologies to support connection-making. International Journal of Human–Computer Studies, 89, 1–23.
Kitcher, P. (1990). The division of cognitive labor. The Journal of Philosophy, 87(1), 5–22.
Koestler, A. (1964). The act of creation. London: Hutchinson & Co.
Kohn, A. (1989). Fortune or failure: Missed opportunities and chance discoveries in science. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Lawley, J. & Tompkins, P. (2008). Maximising serendipity?: The art of recognising and fostering potential. A systemic approach to change, resource document. http://www.cleanlanguage.co.uk/articles/articles/224/1/Maximising?Serendipity/Page1.html/print/224. Accessed 14 July 2017.
Liestman, D. (1992). Chance in the midst of design: Approaches to library research serendipity. RQ, 31(4), 524–532.
Makri, S., & Blandford, A. (2012). Coming across information serendipitously—Part 1: A process model. Journal of Documentation, 68(5), 684–705.
McBirnie, A. (2008). Seeking serendipity: The paradox of control. Aslib Proceedings, 60(6), 600–618.
McBirnie, A., & Urquhart, C. (2011). Motifs: Dominant interaction patterns in event structures of serendipity. IR Information Research,
16(3). http://InformationR.net/ir/16-3/paper494.html. Accessed 5 Sept 2017.
McCay-Peet, L. & Toms, E. G. (2010). The process of serendipity in knowledge work. In Proceedings of the third symposium on information interaction in context (New Brunswick, NJ, USA) (pp. 377–381). doi:10.1145/1840784.1840842. Accessed 14 July 2017.
McCay-Peet, L. (2011). Exploring serendipity’s precipitating conditions. In P. Campos, N. Graham, J. Jorge, N. Nunes, P. Palanque, & M. Winckler (Eds.), Lecture notes in computer science: Human–computer interaction, INTERACT 2011, Lisbon, Portugal (pp. 398–401). New York: Springer.
McCay-Peet, L., & Wells, P. (2017). Serendipity in the sciences: Exploring the boundaries. Proceedings of the Nova Scotian Institution of Science (PNSIS), 49(1), 97–116.
McKinnon, R. (2014). You make your own luck. Metaphilosophy, 45(4–5), 558–577.
Merton, R. K. (1948). The bearing of empirical research upon the development of social theory. American Sociological Review, 13(5), 505–515.
Merton, R. K., & Barber, E. (2004). The travels and adventures of serendipity: A study in sociological semantics and the sociology of science. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Michener, W. K., Bildstein, K. L., McKee, A., Parmenter, R. R., Hargrove, W. W., McClearn, D., et al. (2009). Biological field stations: Research legacies and sites for serendipity. Bioscience, 59(4), 300–310.
Murayama, K., Nirei, M., & Shimizu, H. (2015). Management of science, serendipity, and research performance: Evidence from a survey of scientists in Japan and the U.S. Research Policy, 44, 862–873.
Napolitano, C. M. (2013). More than just a simple twist of fate: Serendipitous relations in developmental science. Human Development, 56(5), 291–318.
Nickles, T. (1997). Methods of discovery. Biology and Philosophy, 12, 127–140.
Nutefall, J. E., & Ryder, P. M. (2010). The serendipitous research process. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 36(3), 228–234.
Roberts, R. (1989). Serendipity: Accidental discoveries in science. New York: Wiley.
Rubin, V. L., Burkell, J., & Quan-Haase, A. (2011). Facets of serendipity in everyday chance encounters: A grounded theory approach to blog analysis. Information Research, 16(3), 1–19.
Solomon, Y. (2017). Temporal aspects of info-serendipity. Temporalités: Revue de sciences sociales et humaines. doi:10.4000/temporalites.3523.
Sommer, T. J. (2001). Suppression of scientific research: Bahramdipity and nulltiple scientific discoveries. Science and Engineering Ethics, 7(1), 77–104.
Strevens, M. (2003). The role of the priority rule in science. The Journal of Philosophy, 100(2), 55–79.
Strevens, M. (2017). Scientific sharing: Communism and the social contract. In T. Boyer-Kassem, C. May-Wilson & M. Weisberg (Eds.), Scientific collaboration and collective knowledge. New York: Oxford University Press. (forthcoming).
Taleb, N. N. (2007). The Black Swan: The impact of the highly improbable. New York City: Random House.
Thagard, P. (1998a). Ulcers and bacteria I?: Discovery and acceptance. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biology and Biomedical Science, 29(1), 107–136.
Thagard, P. (1998b). Ulcers and bacteria II: Instruments, experiments, and social interactions. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 29(2), 317–342.
Thagard, P. (2002). Curing cancer? Patrick Lee’s path to the reovirus treatment. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 16(1), 79–93.
Thagard, P. (2012). Creative combinations of representations, scientific discovery and technological invention. In R. W. Proctor & E. J. Capaldi (Eds.), Psychology of science: Implicit and explicit processes. New York: Oxford University Press.
Thagard, P., & Croft, D. (1999). Scientific discovery and technological innovation: Ulcers, dinosaur extinction, and the programming language Java. In L. Magnani, N. Nersessian, & P. Thagard (Eds.), Model-based reasoning in scientific discovery (pp. 125–137). New York: Springer.
van Andel, P. (1994). Anatomy of the unsought finding. Serendipity: Origin, history, domains, traditions, appearances, patterns and programmability. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 45(2), 631–648.
Walpole, H. (1789). Letter to Mrs. More. In Private Correspondance of Horace Walpole (1820) (Vol. IV, p. 483). London: Rodwell and Martin.
Watson, J. & Crick, F. (1953). Molecular structure of nucleic acids-A structure for Deoxyribose Nucleic Acid. Nature, 4356(April 25), 737–738.
Watson, J. (2010). The double helix: A personal account of the discovery of the structure of DNA. W&N.
Weisburg, M., & Muldoon, R. (2009). Epistemic landscapes and the division of cognitive labor. Philosophy of Science, 76(2), 225–252.