On serendipity in science: discovery at the intersection of chance and wisdom
- 374 Downloads
‘Serendipity’ is a category used to describe discoveries in science that occur at the intersection of chance and wisdom. In this paper, I argue for understanding serendipity in science as an emergent property of scientific discovery, describing an oblique relationship between the outcome of a discovery process and the intentions that drove it forward. The recognition of serendipity is correlated with an acknowledgment of the limits of expectations about potential sources of knowledge. I provide an analysis of serendipity in science as a defense of this definition and its implications, drawing from theoretical and empirical research on experiences of serendipity as they occur in science and elsewhere. I focus on three interrelated features of serendipity in science. First, there are variations of serendipity. The process of serendipitous discovery can be complex. Second, a valuable outcome must be obtained before reflection upon the significance of the unexpected observation or event in respect to that outcome can take place. Therefore, serendipity is retrospectively categorized. Third, the primacy of epistemic expectations is elucidated. Finally, I place this analysis within discussions in philosophy of science regarding the impact of interpersonal competition upon the number and significance of scientific discoveries. Thus, the analysis of serendipity offered in this paper contributes to discussions about the social-epistemological aspects of scientific discovery and has normative implications for the structure of epistemically effective scientific communities.
KeywordsSerendipity Scientific discovery Social-epistemology of science Chance
I would like to extend thanks to the CauseHealth team, my dissertation committee, the Dalhousie Philosophy Department colloquium, and various conference audiences for their constructive criticism and insightful questions. Two anonymous reviewers provided thoughtful advice on how to improve upon previous versions. Funding was provided by The Research Council of Norway (FRIPRO). The Research Council of Norway (NFR, FRIPRO scheme).
- Anjum, R. L., & Mumford, S. (2017). Emergence and demergence. In M. Paulini, P. Orilia, & F. Orilia (Eds.), Philosophical and scientific perspectives on downward causation (pp. 92–109). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Austin, J. H. (2003). Chase, chance, and creativity: The lucky art of novelty. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Bedessem, B. & Ruphy, S. (2016). Serendipity: An argument for scientific freedom? Presented to the Philosophy of Science Association, Atlanta (November). http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/12508/. Accessed 14 July 2017.
- Bush, V. (1945). Science: The endless frontier. Washington DC: United States Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
- Chalmers, D. (2006). Strong and weak emergence. In P. Clayton & P. Davies (Eds.), The re-emergence of emergence (pp. 244–254). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Clayton, P. (2006). Conceptual foundations of emergence theory. In P. Clayton & P. Davies (Eds.), The re-emergence of emergence (pp. 1–31). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Copeland, S. M. (2015). The case of the triggered memory: Serendipitous discovery and the ethics of clinical research. Dalhousie University (Ph.D. Thesis).Google Scholar
- Cunha, M. P. E. (2005). Serendipity: Why some organizations are luckier than others. SSRN Electronic Journal. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.882782.
- Cunha, M. P., Rego, A., Clegg, S., & Lindsay, G. (2015). The dialectics of serendipity. European Management Journal, 33, 9–18.Google Scholar
- de Rond, M. & Morley, I. (2010). Introduction: Fortune and the prepared mind. In M. de Rond & I. Morley (Eds.), Serendipity: Fortune and the prepared mind (pp. 1–10). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Diggins, F. W. E. (1999). The true history of the discovery of penicillin, with refutation of the misinformation in the literature. British Journal of Biomedical Science, 56, 83–93.Google Scholar
- Erdelez, S. (1997). Information encountering: A conceptual framework for accidental information discovery. In ISIC ’96 Proceedings of an international conference on Information seeking in context (pp. 412–421). London, UK: Taylor Graham Publishing.Google Scholar
- Estes, J. (2016). Serendipity: An ecologist’s quest to understand nature. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
- Fleck, L. (1979). Genesis and development of a scientific fact. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Fleming, S. A. (1945). Nobel lecture: Penicillin. Nobel Lectures, Physiology or Medicine, 1942–1962, 83–93.Google Scholar
- Heesen, R. (forthcoming). Communism and the incentive to share in science. Philosophy of Science. doi: 10.1086/693875.
- Kantorovich, A. (1993). Scientific discovery: Logic and tinkering. New York: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
- Koestler, A. (1964). The act of creation. London: Hutchinson & Co.Google Scholar
- Kohn, A. (1989). Fortune or failure: Missed opportunities and chance discoveries in science. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
- Lawley, J. & Tompkins, P. (2008). Maximising serendipity?: The art of recognising and fostering potential. A systemic approach to change, resource document. http://www.cleanlanguage.co.uk/articles/articles/224/1/Maximising?Serendipity/Page1.html/print/224. Accessed 14 July 2017.
- Liestman, D. (1992). Chance in the midst of design: Approaches to library research serendipity. RQ, 31(4), 524–532.Google Scholar
- Makri, S., & Blandford, A. (2012). Coming across information serendipitously—Part 1: A process model. Journal of Documentation, 68(5), 684–705.Google Scholar
- McBirnie, A., & Urquhart, C. (2011). Motifs: Dominant interaction patterns in event structures of serendipity. IR Information Research, 16(3). http://InformationR.net/ir/16-3/paper494.html. Accessed 5 Sept 2017.
- McCay-Peet, L. & Toms, E. G. (2010). The process of serendipity in knowledge work. In Proceedings of the third symposium on information interaction in context (New Brunswick, NJ, USA) (pp. 377–381). doi: 10.1145/1840784.1840842. Accessed 14 July 2017.
- McCay-Peet, L. (2011). Exploring serendipity’s precipitating conditions. In P. Campos, N. Graham, J. Jorge, N. Nunes, P. Palanque, & M. Winckler (Eds.), Lecture notes in computer science: Human–computer interaction, INTERACT 2011, Lisbon, Portugal (pp. 398–401). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- McCay-Peet, L., & Wells, P. (2017). Serendipity in the sciences: Exploring the boundaries. Proceedings of the Nova Scotian Institution of Science (PNSIS), 49(1), 97–116.Google Scholar
- Merton, R. K., & Barber, E. (2004). The travels and adventures of serendipity: A study in sociological semantics and the sociology of science. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Roberts, R. (1989). Serendipity: Accidental discoveries in science. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Rubin, V. L., Burkell, J., & Quan-Haase, A. (2011). Facets of serendipity in everyday chance encounters: A grounded theory approach to blog analysis. Information Research, 16(3), 1–19.Google Scholar
- Solomon, Y. (2017). Temporal aspects of info-serendipity. Temporalités: Revue de sciences sociales et humaines. doi: 10.4000/temporalites.3523.
- Strevens, M. (2017). Scientific sharing: Communism and the social contract. In T. Boyer-Kassem, C. May-Wilson & M. Weisberg (Eds.), Scientific collaboration and collective knowledge. New York: Oxford University Press. (forthcoming).Google Scholar
- Taleb, N. N. (2007). The Black Swan: The impact of the highly improbable. New York City: Random House.Google Scholar
- Thagard, P. (2012). Creative combinations of representations, scientific discovery and technological invention. In R. W. Proctor & E. J. Capaldi (Eds.), Psychology of science: Implicit and explicit processes. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Thagard, P., & Croft, D. (1999). Scientific discovery and technological innovation: Ulcers, dinosaur extinction, and the programming language Java. In L. Magnani, N. Nersessian, & P. Thagard (Eds.), Model-based reasoning in scientific discovery (pp. 125–137). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Walpole, H. (1789). Letter to Mrs. More. In Private Correspondance of Horace Walpole (1820) (Vol. IV, p. 483). London: Rodwell and Martin.Google Scholar
- Watson, J. & Crick, F. (1953). Molecular structure of nucleic acids-A structure for Deoxyribose Nucleic Acid. Nature, 4356(April 25), 737–738.Google Scholar
- Watson, J. (2010). The double helix: A personal account of the discovery of the structure of DNA. W&N.Google Scholar