Network analyses in systems biology: new strategies for dealing with biological complexity
- 503 Downloads
The increasing application of network models to interpret biological systems raises a number of important methodological and epistemological questions. What novel insights can network analysis provide in biology? Are network approaches an extension of or in conflict with mechanistic research strategies? When and how can network and mechanistic approaches interact in productive ways? In this paper we address these questions by focusing on how biological networks are represented and analyzed in a diverse class of case studies. Our examples span from the investigation of organizational properties of biological networks using tools from graph theory to the application of dynamical systems theory to understand the behavior of complex biological systems. We show how network approaches support and extend traditional mechanistic strategies but also offer novel strategies for dealing with biological complexity.
KeywordsNetwork modeling Systems biology Biological networks Representation Mechanistic research strategies
This paper was initiated while the authors were fellows at the Center for Philosophy of Science, University of Pittsburgh. We would like to thank the Center for providing us such a rich environment that was conducive to establishing this collaboration. We also thank three anonymous referees for their critical suggestions. Ingo Brigandt’s work is also supported by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (Insight Grant 435-2016-0500).
- Alon, U. (2007). An introduction to systems biology: Design principles of biological circuits. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC.Google Scholar
- Barabási, A.-L., & Albert, R. (1999). Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science, 286, 509–512.Google Scholar
- Bechtel, W., & Richardson, R. C. (1993/2010). Discovering complexity: Decomposition and localization as strategies in scientific research. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 1993 edition published by Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Brigandt, I., Green, S., & O’Malley, M. A. (2017). Systems biology and mechanistic explanation. In S. Glennan & P. Illari (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of mechanisms and mechanical philosophy. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Craver, C. F., & Darden, L. (2013). In search of mechanisms: Discoveries across the life sciences. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- De Lichtenberg, U., Jensen, L. J., Brunak, S., & Bork, P. (2005). Dynamic complex formation during the yeast cell cycle. Science, 307, 724–727.Google Scholar
- Gross, F. (2011). What systems biology can tell us about disease. History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences, 33, 477–496.Google Scholar
- Mangan, S., Zaslaver, A., & Alon, U. (2003). The coherent feedforward loop serves as a sign-sensitive delay element in transcription networks. Journal of Molecular Biology, 334, 197–204.Google Scholar
- Waddington, C. H. (1940). Organisers and genes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Wagner, A., & Fell, D. (2001). The small world inside large metabolic networks. Biological Sciences: Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 280, 1803–1810.Google Scholar
- Woodward, J. (2003). Making things happen: A theory of causal explanation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar