Antony, L. (2011). The openness of illusions. Philosophical Issues, 21, 25–44.
Article
Google Scholar
Armstrong, D. M. (1968). A materialist theory of the mind. London: Routledge (revised ed. 1993).
Bengson, J. (2015). The intellectual given. Mind and Language, 124, 707–760.
Article
Google Scholar
Bergmann, M. (2006). Justification without awareness. New York: Oxford University Press.
Book
Google Scholar
Bergmann, M. (2013). Phenomenal conservatism and the dilemma for internalism. In C. Tucker (Ed.), Seemings and justification: New essays on dogmatism and phenomenal conservatism (pp. 154–179). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Chapter
Google Scholar
BonJour, L. (1985). The structure of empirical knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Google Scholar
Brewer, B. (1999). Perception and reason. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Google Scholar
Brewer, B. (2006). Perception and content. European Journal of Philosophy, 14, 165–181.
Article
Google Scholar
Brewer, B. (2011). Perception and its objects. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Book
Google Scholar
Briesen, J. (2015). Perceptual justification and assertively representing the world. Philosophical Studies, 172, 2239–2259.
Article
Google Scholar
Brogaard, B. (2010). Strong representationalism and centered content. Philosophical Studies, 151, 373–392.
Article
Google Scholar
Brogaard, B. (2013). Phenomenal seemings and sensible dogmatism. In C. Tucker (Ed.), Seemings and justification: New essays on dogmatism and phenomenal conservatism (pp. 270–289). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Chapter
Google Scholar
Burge, T. (2003). Perceptual entitlement. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, LXVII, 503–548.
Article
Google Scholar
Burge, T. (2010). Origins of objectivity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Book
Google Scholar
Byrne, A. (2005). Perception and conceptual content. In M. Steup & E. Sosa (Eds.), Contemporary debates in epistemology (pp. 231–250). Oxford: Blackwell.
Google Scholar
Byrne, A. (2016). The epistemic significance of experience. Philosophical Studies, 173, 947–967.
Carnap, R. (1950). Logical foundations of probability theory. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Google Scholar
Carroll, L. (1895). What the tortoise said to achilles. Mind, 104, 691–693.
Article
Google Scholar
Christensen, D. (1992). Confirmational holism and Bayesian epistemology. Philosophy of Science, 59, 540–557.
Article
Google Scholar
Christensen, D. (2010). Higher-order evidence. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 81, 185–215.
Article
Google Scholar
Christensen, D. (forthcoming). Disagreement, Drugs, etc.: From accuracy to akrasia. Episteme.
Chudnoff, E. (2013). Intuition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Book
Google Scholar
Cohen, S. (2005). Why basic knowledge is easy knowledge. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 70, 417–430.
Article
Google Scholar
Comesaña, J., & McGrath, M. (2016). Perceptual reasons. Philosophical Studies, 173, 991–1006.
Crane, T. (1992). The nonconceptual content of experience. In T. Crane (Ed.), The contents of experience (pp. 136–157). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Chapter
Google Scholar
Crane, T. (2013). The given. In J. K. Schear (Ed.), Mind, reason, and being-in-the-world (pp. 229–249). New York: Routledge.
Google Scholar
Davidson, D. (1983). A coherence theory of truth and knowledge. In Subjective, intersubjective, objective (pp. 137–153). Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2001.
Davidson, D. (1997). Seeing through language. In Truth, language and history (pp. 127–141). Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2005.
Davidson, D. (1999). Reply to John McDowell. In L. E. Hahn (Ed.), The philosophy of Donald Davidson (pp. 105–108). Chicago: Open Court.
Google Scholar
Egan, A. (2006a). Appearance properties? Nous, 40, 495–521.
Article
Google Scholar
Egan, A. (2006b). Secondary qualities and self-location. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 72, 97–119.
Article
Google Scholar
Egan, A. (2010). Projectivism without error. In Bence Nanay (Ed.), Perceiving the world (pp. 68–96). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Chapter
Google Scholar
Evans, G. (1982). The varieties of reference. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar
Frith, C. (2009). Making up the mind. The Psychologist, 22, 842–845.
Google Scholar
Gauker, C. (forthcoming). The argument from ‘Looks’-Talk. In J. Gersel, R. T. Jensen, M. S. Thaning, & S. Overgaard (Eds.), The light of experience: Essays on reasons and perception. Mind Association Occasional Series. Oxford: OUP.
Genone, J. (2014). Appearance and illusion. Mind, 123, 339–376.
Article
Google Scholar
Ginsborg, H. (2006). Reasons for belief. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 72, 286–318.
Article
Google Scholar
Glüer, K. (2003). Analyticity and implicit definition. Grazer Philosophische Studien, 66, 37–60.
Article
Google Scholar
Glüer, K. (2004). On perceiving that. Theoria, 70, 197–212.
Article
Google Scholar
Glüer, K. (2009). In defence of a doxastic account of experience. Mind and Language, 24, 297–373.
Article
Google Scholar
Glüer, K. (2012a). Colors and the content of color experience. Croation Journal of Philosophy, 12, 421–437.
Google Scholar
Glüer, K. (2012b). Perception and intermediaries. In G. Preyer (Ed.), Donald Davidson on truth, meaning, and the mental (pp. 192–213). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Chapter
Google Scholar
Glüer, K. (2013). Martin on the semantics of looks. Thought, 1, 292–300.
Google Scholar
Glüer, K. (2014). Looks, reasons, and experiences. In B. Brogaard (Ed.), Does perception have content? (pp. 76–102). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Chapter
Google Scholar
Glüer, K. (2016a). Constancy in variation. An argument for centering the content of experience? In S. Torre & M. García-Carpintero (Eds.), De Se thought and communication (pp. 56–85). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar
Glüer, K. (2016b). Intentionalism, defeasibility, and justification. Philosophical Studies, 173, 1007–1030. doi:10.1007/s11098-015-0538-6.
Article
Google Scholar
Glüer, K., & Wikforss, Å. (2013). Against belief normativity. In T. Chan (Ed.), The aim of belief (pp. 121–146). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar
Glüer, K., & Wikforss, Å. (forthcoming). Reasons for belief and normativity. In D. Star (Ed.), Oxford handbook of reasons and normativity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Harman, G. (1990). The intrinsic quality of experience. In J. Tomberlin (Ed.), Philosophical perspectives: Action theory and philosophy of mind (Vol. 4, pp. 31–52). Northridge, CA: Ridgeview.
Google Scholar
Heck, R. G. (2000). Non-conceptual content and the space of reasons. Philosophical Review, 109, 483–523.
Article
Google Scholar
Heck, R. G. (2007). Are there different kinds of content? In J. Cohen & B. McLaughlin (Eds.), Contemporary debates in the philosophy of mind (pp. 117–138). Oxford: Black well.
Google Scholar
Huemer, M. (2001). Skepticism and the veil of perception. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
Google Scholar
Huemer, M. (2007). Compassionate phenomenal conservatism. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 74, 30–55.
Article
Google Scholar
Huemer, M. (2013a). Epistemological asymmetries between belief and experience. Philosophical Studies, 162, 741–748.
Article
Google Scholar
Huemer, M. (2013b). Phenomenal conservatism Über Alles. In C. Tucker (Ed.), Seemings and justification: New essays on dogmatism and phenomenal conservatism (pp. 328–350). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Chapter
Google Scholar
Jeffrey, R. (1965). The logic of decision. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Google Scholar
Kelly, T. (2005). The epistemic significance of disagreement. In T. Gendler & J. Hawthorne (Eds.), Oxford studies in epistemology (pp. 167–196). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar
Koksvik, O. (2011). Intuition. Ph.D. Thesis, The Australian National University.
Lasonen-Aarnio, M. (2014). Higher-order evidence and the limits of defeat. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 88, 314–345.
Article
Google Scholar
Manning, R. (2003). Interpretation, reasons, and facts. Inquiry, 46, 346–376.
Article
Google Scholar
Martin, M. G. F. (2002). The transparency of experience. Mind and Language, 17, 376–425.
Article
Google Scholar
Martin, M. G. F. (2010). What’s in a look? In B. Nanay (Ed.), Perceiving the world (pp. 160–225). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Chapter
Google Scholar
McDowell, J. (1994). Mind and world. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Google Scholar
McDowell, J. (1997). Brandomon representation and inference. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 57, 157–162.
Article
Google Scholar
McDowell, J. (1998). Reply to commentators. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 58, 403–431.
Article
Google Scholar
McDowell, J. (2008). Avoiding the myth of the given. In J. Lindgaard (Ed.), John McDowell: Experience, norm, and nature (pp. 1–14). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
Google Scholar
McGrath, M. (2013). Dogmatism, underminers and skepticism. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 86, 533–562.
Article
Google Scholar
McGrath, M. (2016). Looks and perceptual justification. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. doi:10.1111/phpr.12289.
Moretti, L. (2015a). In defence of dogmatism. Philosophical Studies, 172, 261–282.
Article
Google Scholar
Moretti, L. (2015b). Recent work: Phenomenal conservatism. Analysis, 75, 296–309.
Article
Google Scholar
Noë, A. (2004). Action in perception. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
Google Scholar
Pagin, P. (2000). Sensation terms. Dialectica, 54, 177–199.
Article
Google Scholar
Pautz, A. (2009). What are the contents of experiences? The Philosophical Quarterly, 59, 483–507.
Article
Google Scholar
Piazza, L., & Moretti, T. (2015). Phenomenal conservatism and Bergmann’s dilemma. Erkenntnis, 80, 1271–1290.
Article
Google Scholar
Pollock, J. (1974). Knowledge and justification. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Google Scholar
Pollock, J., & Oved, I. (2005). Vision, knowledge, and the mystery link. Philosophical Perspectives, 19, 309–351.
Article
Google Scholar
Pryor, J. (2000). The skeptic and the dogmatist. Nous, 34, 517–549.
Article
Google Scholar
Pryor, J. (2005). There is immediate justification. In M. Steup & E. Sosa (Eds.), Contemporary debates in epistemology (pp. 181–202). Oxford: Blackwell.
Google Scholar
Pryor, J. (2013). Problems for credulism. In C. Tucker (Ed.), Seeming and justification: New essays on dogmatism and phenomenal conservatism (pp. 89–131). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Chapter
Google Scholar
Reiter, R. (1987). Nonmonotonic reasoning. Annual Review of Computer Science, 2, 147–186.
Article
Google Scholar
Schellenberg, S. (2007). Action and self-location in perception. Mind, 116, 603–631.
Article
Google Scholar
Schellenberg, S. (2008). The situation-dependency of perception. The Journal of Philosophy, 105, 55–84.
Article
Google Scholar
Schellenberg, S. (2011). Perceptual content defended. Nous, 45, 714–750.
Article
Google Scholar
Searle, J. (1983). Intentionality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Book
Google Scholar
Sellars, W. (1963). Empiricism and the philosophy of mind. In Science perception and reality (pp. 127–196). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Shoemaker, S. (1994). Phenomenal character. Nous, 28, 21–39.
Article
Google Scholar
Shoemaker, S. (2000). Introspection and phenomenal character. Philosophical Topics, 28, 247–273.
Article
Google Scholar
Siegel, S. (2010). Do experiences have contents? In B. Nanay (Ed.), Perceiving the world (pp. 333–368). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Chapter
Google Scholar
Siegel, S. (2011). The contents of visual experience. New York: Oxford University Press.
Book
Google Scholar
Skene, M. (2013). Seemings and the possibility of epistemic justification. Philosophical Studies, 163, 539–559.
Article
Google Scholar
Sliwa, P., & Horowitz, S. (2015). Respecting all the evidence. Philosophical Studies (online first). doi:10.1007/s11098-015-0446-9.
Sosa, D. (2015). What does it matter what it’s like? Philosophical Issues, 25, 224–242.
Article
Google Scholar
Speaks, J. (2005). Is there a problem about nonconceptual content? Philosophical Review, 114, 359–398.
Article
Google Scholar
Spectre, L. (2009). Knowledge closure and knowledge openness. A study of epistemic closure principles. Ph.D. Thesis, Stockholm University.
Stroud, B. (2002). Sense-experience and the grounding of thought. In N. H. Smith (Ed.), Reading McDowell: On mind and world (pp. 79–91). London: Routledge.
Google Scholar
Tolhurst, W. (1998). Seemings. American Philosophical Quarterly, 35, 293–302.
Google Scholar
Travis, C. (2004). The silence of the senses. Mind, 113, 57–94.
Article
Google Scholar
Tye, M. (1995). Perceptual experience is a many-layered thing. Philosophical Issues, 7, 117–126.
Article
Google Scholar
Weisberg, J. (2009). Commutativity or holism: A dilemma for conditionalizers. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 60, 793–812.
Article
Google Scholar
Weisberg, J. (2015). Updating, undermining, and independence. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 66, 121–159.
Article
Google Scholar
White, R. (2006). Problems for dogmatism. Philosophical Studies, 131, 525–557.
Article
Google Scholar
Williamson, T. (2000). Knowledge and its limits. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar
Wright, C. (2004). Warrant for nothing (and foundations for free? Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volume, 78, 167–212.
Wright, C. (2007). The perils of dogmatism. In S. Nuccetelli & G. Seay (Eds.), Themes from G. E. Moore: New essays in epistemology and ethics (pp. 25–47). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar