# A match not made in heaven: on the applicability of mathematics in physics

- 408 Downloads
- 1 Citations

## Abstract

In his seminal 1960 paper, the physicist Eugene Wigner formulated the question of the applicability of mathematics in physics in a way nobody had before. This formulation has been (almost) entirely overlooked due to an exclusive concern with (dis)solving Wigner’s problem and explaining the effectiveness of mathematics in the natural sciences, in one way or another. Many have attempted to attribute Wigner’s unjustified conclusion—that mathematics is unreasonably effective in the natural sciences—to his (dogmatic) formalist views on mathematics. My goal is to show that this reading misses out on Wigner’s highly original formulation of the problem which is presented throughout his body of work in physics as well as in philosophy. This formulation, as I will show, leads us in a new direction in solving the applicability problem.

## Keywords

Applicability of mathematics Wigner’s Puzzle Unreasonable effectiveness Laws of nature Invariance principles## Notes

### Acknowledgments

I thank Tom Donaldson, Krista Lawlor, Solomon Feferman, Michael Friedman, Mark Steiner, José Ferreirós and Jonathan Ettel for their insightful suggestions. My special thanks are to Thomas Ryckman for his enormously useful comments on several revisions of this paper.

## References

- Bigelow, J., & Pargetter, R. (1991).
*Science and necessity*. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Burtt, E. A. (1923).
*The metaphysical foundations of modern physical science: A historical and critical essay*. Trench, Trbner, London: London K. Paul, Trench, Trbner.Google Scholar - Buzaglo, M. (2002).
*The logic of concept expansion*. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar - Colyvan, M. (2001). The miracle of applied mathematics.
*Synthese*,*127*, 265–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Ferreirós, J. (forthcoming). Wigner’s ’unreasonable effectiveness’ in context.
*Mathematical Intelligencer*.Google Scholar - Grattan-Guinness, I. (2008). Solving wigner’s mystery: The reasonable (though perhaps limited) effectiveness of mathematics in the natural sciences.
*Mathematical Intelligencer*,*30*, 7–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Gross, D. J. (1995). Symmetry in physics: Wigner’s legacy.
*Physics Today*,*48*, 46–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Hamming, R. W. (1980). The unreasonable effectiveness of mathematics.
*American Mathematical Monthly*,*87*, 81–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Hardy, G. H. (1940).
*A mathematician’s apology*. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar - Hawkins, T. (1974). The theory of matrices in 9th century. In
*Proceedings of the International Congress of Mathematicians Vancouver*.Google Scholar - Kahane, J.-P. (1991). Jacques hadamard.
*The Mathematical Intelligencer*,*13*, 23–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Longo, G., & Montévil, M. (2016). Comparing symmetries in models and simulations. In M. Dorato, L. Magnani, & T. Bertolotti (Eds.),
*Springer handbook of model-based science*. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar - Longo, G., & Montévil, M. (2013). Extended criticality, phase spaces and enablement in biology.
*Chaos, Solition and Fractals*,*55*, 64–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Longo, G. (2005). The reasonable effectiveness of mathematics and its cognitive roots. In L. Boi (Ed.),
*Geometries of nature, living systems and human cognition*(pp. 351–382). Singapore: World Scientific.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Lützen, J. (2011). The physical origin of physically useful mathematics.
*Interdisciplinary Science Reviews*,*36*, 229–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Mandic, D. P., & Lee Goh, V. S. (2009).
*Complex valued nonlinear adaptive filters: Noncircularity, widely linear and neural models*. New York: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Penrose, R. (1989).
*The emperor’s new mind: Concerning computers, minds and the laws of physics*. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar - Pincock, C. (2014).
*Mathematics and scientific representation*. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar - Roman, P. (2004). Why symmetry? some personal reflections.
*Symmetries in Science*,*11*, 1–12.Google Scholar - Sarukkai, S. (2005). Revisiting the ’unreasonable effectiveness’ of mathematics.
*Current Science*,*88*, 415–423.Google Scholar - Steiner, M. (1998).
*The applicability of mathematics as a philosophical problem*. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar - Unger, R. M., & Smolin, L. (2014).
*The singular universe and the reality of time*. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Velupillai, K. V. (2005). The unreasonable ineffectiveness of mathematics in economics.
*Cambridge Journal of Economics*,*29*, 849–872.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Weinberg, S. (1992).
*Dreams of a final theory: The scientist’s search for the ultimate laws of nature*. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar - Weyl, H. (1995). Topology and abstract algebra as two roads of mathematical comprehension.
*American Mathematical Monthly*,*102*, 453–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Wigner, E. (1949). Invariance in physical theory.
*Symmetries and Reflections*,*93*, 521–526.Google Scholar - Wigner, E. (1960). The unreasonable effectiveness of mathematics in the natural sciences.
*Communications in Pure and Applied Mathematics*,*13*, 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Wigner, E. (1963). The role of invariance principles in natural philosophy.
*Symmetries and Reflections*(pp. 28–37).Google Scholar - Wigner, E. (1964a). Events, laws of nature, and invariance principles.
*Symmetries and Reflections*(pp. 38–50).Google Scholar - Wigner, E. (1964b). Symmetry and conservation laws.
*Symmetries and Reflections*(pp. 14–27).Google Scholar - Wigner, E. (1995). Symmetry in nature. In J.Mehra (Ed.),
*The Collected Works of Wigner*(pp. 382–411). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar