, Volume 194, Issue 12, pp 4757–4779 | Cite as

Theoretical considerations on cognitive niche construction

  • Tommaso BertolottiEmail author
  • Lorenzo Magnani


Cognitive niche theories consist in a theoretical framework that is proving extremely profitable in bridging evolutionary biology, philosophy, cognitive science, and anthropology by offering an inter-disciplinary ground, laden with novel approaches and debates. At the same time, cognitive niche theories are multiple, and differently related to niche theories in theoretical and evolutionary biology. The aim of this paper is to clarify the theoretical and epistemological relationships between cognitive and ecological niche theories. Also, by adopting a constructionist approach (namely by referring principally to ecological and cognitive niche construction theories) we will try to explain the shift from ecological to cognitive niches and their actual and theoretical overlaps. In order to do so, we will take two concepts expressing loose forms of causation in the interaction between organisms and their environment: the biological notion of “enablement” and the psycho-cognitive one of “affordance”.


Ecological niche Cognitive niche Extended cognition Affordances Enablements 



Research for this article was supported by the 2012 National Research Grant (PRIN) “Models and Inferences in Science: Logical, Epistemological, and Cognitive Aspects” from the Italian Ministry of Education, University and Research (MIUR). The authors wish to express their gratitude to the two anonymous referees, whose insightful comments helped shaping the final version of this article.


  1. Bertolotti, T., & Cinerari, C. (2013). The gospel according to Google: The future of religious niches and technological spirituality. European Journal of Science and Theology, 9(1), 41–53.Google Scholar
  2. Bertolotti, T., & Magnani, L. (2015). Contemporary finance as a critical cognitive niche. Mind & Society, 14(2), 273–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Calo, R. (2016). Can Americans resist surveillance? The University of Chicago Law Review, 83, 23–46.Google Scholar
  4. Clark, A. (1997). Being there: Putting brain, body, and world together again. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  5. Clark, A. (2005). Word, niche and super-niche: How language makes minds matter more. Theoria, 54, 255–268.Google Scholar
  6. Clark, A. (2006). Language, embodiment, and the cognitive niche. Trends in Cognitive Science, 10(8), 370–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Clark, A., & Chalmers, D. J. (1998). The extended mind. Analysis, 58, 10–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Day, R. L., Laland, K., & Odling-Smee, F. J. (2003). Rethinking adaptation. The niche-construction perspective. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 46(1), 80–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Elton, C. S. (1927). Animal ecology. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  10. Gibson, J. J. (1951). What is a form? Psychological Review, 58, 403–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  12. Godfrey-Smith, P. (1998). Complexity and the function of mind in nature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Griesemer, J. (2000). Development, culture, and the units of inheritance. Philosophy of Science, 67, S348–S368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Grinnell, J., & Swarth, H. S. (1913). An account of the birds and mammals of the San Jacinto area of southern California with remarks upon the behavior of geographic races on the margins of their habitats. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hildebrandt, M. (2015). Smart technologies and the end(s) of law: Novel entanglements of law and technology. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hutchinson, G. E. (1957). Concluding remarks. Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology, 22, 415–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Iriki, A., & Taoka, M. (2012). Triadic (ecological, neural, cognitive) niche construction: A scenario of human brain evolution extrapolating tool use and language from the control of reaching actions. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 367, 10–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jablonka, E., & Lamb, M. J. (2005). Evolution in four dimensions. Genetic, epigenetic, behavioral, and symbolic variation in the history of life. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  19. Laland, K. N., Odling-Smee, F. J., & Feldman, M. W. (2000). Niche construction, biological evolution and cultural change. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23(1), 131–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Levins, R., & Lewontin, R. C. (1985). The dialectical biologist. Harvard: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Lewontin, R. C. (1983). Gene, organism and environment. In D. S. Bendall (Ed.), Evolution from molecules to men. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Longo, G., & Montévil, M. (2014). Perspectives on organisms. Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Longo, G., Montévil, M., & Kauffman, S. (2012). No entailing laws, but enablement in the evolution of the biosphere. GECCO companion ’12 proceedings of the fourteenth international conference on genetic and evolutionary computation conference companion (pp. 1379–1392). New York: ACM.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. MacArthur, R., & Levins, R. (1967). The limiting similarity, convergence, and divergence of coexisting species. American Naturalist, 101, 377–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Magnani, L. (2007). Creating chances through niche construction. The role of affordances. In B. Apolloni (Ed.), Knowledge-based intelligent information and engineering systems: 11th International conference, KES 2007, proceedings, Part II, Vietri sul Mare, Italy, September 12–14, 2007. Lecture notes in computer science. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  26. Magnani, L. (2009). Abductive cognition: The epistemological and eco-cognitive dimensions of hypothetical reasoning. Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Magnani, L., & Bardone, E. (2008). Sharing representations and creating chances through cognitive niche construction. The role of affordances and abduction. In S. Iwata, Y. Oshawa, S. Tsumoto, N. Zhong, Y. Shi, & L. Magnani (Eds.), Communications and discoveries from multidisciplinary data (pp. 3–40). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  28. Menary, R. (Ed.). (2010). The extended mind. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  29. Nagy, P., & Neff, G. (2015). Imagined affordance: Reconstructing a keyword for communication theory. Social Media & Society, 1(2), 1–9.Google Scholar
  30. Norman, D. A. (1988a). The design of everyday things. New York: Addison Wesley.Google Scholar
  31. Norman, D. A. (1988b). The psychology of everyday things. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  32. Odling-Smee, F. J., Laland, K. N., & Feldman, M. W. (2003). Niche construction. The neglected process in evolution. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Pinker, S. (2003). Language as an adaptation to the cognitive niche. In M. H. Christiansen & S. Kirby (Eds.), Language evolution (pp. 16–37). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Pocheville, A. (2015). The ecological niche: History and recent controversies. In T. Heams, P. Huneman, G. Lecointre, & M. Silberstein (Eds.), Handbook of evolutionary thinking in the sciences (pp. 547–586). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  35. Reed, E. S. (1988). James J. Gibson and the psychology of perception. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Sage, J. (2004). Truth-reliability and the evolution of human cognitive faculties. Philosophical Studies, 117, 95–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Shavit, A., & Griesemer, J. (2011). Mind the gaps: Why are niche construction models so rarely used? In S. B. Gissis & E. Jablonka (Eds.), Transformations of Lamarckism (pp. 307–317). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Sinha, C. (2015). Language and other artifacts: Socio-cultural dynamics of niche construction. Frontiers in Psychology, 6(1601). doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01601.
  39. Sinha, C. (2015). Ontogenesis, semiosis and the epigenetic dynamics of biocultural niche construction. Cognitive Development Online First. doi: 10.1016/j.cogdev.2015.09.006.
  40. Tooby, J., & DeVore, I. (1987). The reconstruction of hominid behavioral evolution through strategic modeling. In W. G. Kinzey (Ed.), Primate models of hominid behavior (pp. 183–237). Albany: Suny Press.Google Scholar
  41. Wallach, E. (2015). Niche construction theory as an explanatory framework for human phenomena. Synthese Online First. doi: 10.1007/s11229-015-0868-0.
  42. Weir, A. A. S., & Kacelnik, A. (2006). A new Caledonian crow (Corvus moneduloides) creatively re-designs tools by bending or unbending aluminium strips. Animal Cognition, 9, 317–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Withagen, R., de Poel, H. J., Araújo, D., & Pepping, G. J. (2012). Affordances can invite behavior: Reconsidering the relationship between affordances and agency. New Ideas in Psychology, 30, 250–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Humanities – Philosophy Section & Computational Philosophy LaboratoryUniversity of PaviaPaviaItaly

Personalised recommendations