Synthese

, Volume 194, Issue 3, pp 761–785 | Cite as

Defending the liberal-content view of perceptual experience: direct social perception of emotions and person impressions

S.I.: Future of Social Cognition

Abstract

The debate about direct perception encompasses different topics, one of which concerns the richness of the contents of perceptual experiences. Can we directly perceive only low-level properties, like edges, colors etc. (the sparse-content view), or can we perceive high-level properties and entities as well (the liberal-content view)? The aim of the paper is to defend the claim that the content of our perceptual experience can include emotions and also person impressions. Using these examples, an argument is developed to defend a liberal-content view for core examples of social cognition. This view is developed and contrasted with accounts which claim that in the case of registering another person’s emotion while seeing them, we have to describe the relevant content not as the content of a perceptual experience, but of a perceptual belief. The paper defends the view that perceptual experiences can have a rich content yet remain separable from beliefs formed on the basis of the experience. How liberal and enriched the content of a perceptual experience is will depend upon the expertise a person has developed in the field. This is supported by the argument that perceptual experiences can be systematically enriched by perceiving affordances of objects, by pattern recognition or by top-down processes, as analyzed by processes of cognitive penetration or predictive coding.

Keywords

Direct perception Rich content Liberal content Emotion Person impression Cognitive penetration Predictive coding Pattern recognition 

References

  1. Abernethy, B., Gill, D. P., Parks, S. L., & Packer, S. T. (2001). Expertise and the perception of kinematic and situational probability information. Perception, 30(2), 233–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allen, C. (1999). Animal concepts revisited: The use of self-monitoring as an empirical approach. Erkenntnis, 51(1), 33–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ambady, N., & Rosenthal, R. (1992). Thin slices of expressive behavior as predictors of interpersonal consequences: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 111(2), 56–274. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.111.2.256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Avril, M., Leclère, C., Viaux, S., Michelet, S., Achard, C., Missonier, S., et al. (2014). Social signal processing for studying parent–infant interaction. Frontiers in Psychology. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01437.
  5. Bar, M. (2003). A cortical mechanism for triggering top-down facilitation in visual object recognition. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 15, 600–609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bar, M. (2009). The proactive brain: Memory for predictions. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 364, 1235–1243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bar, M., Neta, M., & Linz, H. (2006). Very first impressions. Emotion, 6(2), 269–278. doi: 10.1037/1528-3542.6.2.269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Barlassina, L., & Newen, A. (2013). The role of bodily perception in emotion: In defense of an impure somatic theory. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 89(3), 637–678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Baudoin, J.-Y., & Humphreys, G. W. (2006). Configural information in gender categorisation. Perception, 35(4), 531–540. doi: 10.1068/p3403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bayne, T. (2009). Perception and the reach of phenomenal content. Philosophical Quarterly, 59(236), 385–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brewer, M. B. (1988). A dual-process model of impression formation. In R. S. Wyer Jr. & T. K. Srull (Eds.), Advances in social cognition (Vol. 1, pp. 1–36). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  12. Brown, E. C., & Brüne, M. (2012). The role of prediction in social neuroscience. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6(147). doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00147.
  13. Brown, E. C., & Perrett, D. I. (1993). What gives a face its gender? Perception, 22(7), 829–840. doi: 10.1068/p220829.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bruce, V., Burton, A. M., Hanna, E., Healey, P., Mason, O., Coombes, A., et al. (1993). Sex discrimination: How do we tell the difference between male and female faces? Perception, 22(2), 131–152. doi: 10.1068/p220131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Butterfill, S. A. (2009). Seeing causings and hearing gestures. Philosophical Quarterly, 59(236), 405–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Carroll, J. M., & Russell, J. A. (1996). Do facial expression signal specific emotions? Judging emotions from the face in context. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(2), 205–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Chao, L. L., & Martin, A. (2000). Representation of manipulable man-made objects in the dorsal stream. Neuroimage, 12, 478–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Clark, A. (2013). Whatever next? Predictive brains, situated agents, and the future of cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36, 181–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Devine, P. G., & Elliot, A. J. (1995). Are racial stereotypes really fading? The Princeton trilogy revisited. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21(11), 1139–1150. doi: 10.1177/01461672952111002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dion, K., Berscheid, E., & Walster, E. (1972). What is beautiful is good. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 24(3), 285–290. doi: 10.1037/h0033731.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Dretske, F. (1981). Knowledge and the flow of information. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  22. Eagly, A. H., Ashmore, R. D., Makhijani, M. G., & Longo, L. C. (1991). What is beautiful is good, but.: A meta-analytic review of research on the physical attractiveness stereotype. Psychological Bulletin, 110(1), 109–128. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.110.1.109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ekman, P. (1972). Emotions in the human face. New York: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  24. Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. V. (1971). Constants across cultures in the face and emotion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 17, 124–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ernst, M. O., & Bülthoff, H. H. (2004). Merging the senses into a robust percept. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8(4), 162–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Firestone, C., & Scholl, B. J. (forthcoming). Cognition does not affect perception: Evaluating the evidence for ‘top-down’ effects. Behavioral and Brain Sciences.Google Scholar
  27. Fiske, S. T., & Neuberg, S. L. (1990). A continuum of impression formation, from category-based to individuating processes: Influences of information and motivation on attention and interpretation. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 23, 1–74. doi: 10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60317-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Fodor, J. (1975). The language of thought. New York: Thomas Y. Crowell.Google Scholar
  29. Fodor, J. (2008). LOT 2: The language of thought revisited. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Frischen, A., Bayliss, A. P., & Tipper, S. P. (2007). Gaze cueing of attention: Visual attention, social cognition, and individual differences. Psychological Bulletin, 133(4), 694–724. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.133.4.694.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Friston, K., & Frith, C. (2015). A duet for one. Consciousness and Cognition. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2014.12.003.
  32. Gallagher, S. (2008). Direct perception in the intersubjective context. Consciousness and Cognition, 17(2), 535–543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Gao, T., Newman, G. E., & Scholl, B. J. (2009). The psychophysics of chasing: A case study in the perception of animacy. Cognitive Psychology, 59(2), 154–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  35. Gilbert, C. D., & Li, W. (2013). Top-down influences on visual processing. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 14(5), 350–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Glock, H. J. (2010). Concepts, abilities and propositions. Grazer Philosophische Studien, 81(2010), 115–136.Google Scholar
  37. Gobet, F. (1997). Roles of pattern recognition and search in expert problem solving. Thinking and Reasoning, 3(4), 291–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Gobet, F., & Simon, H. A. (1996). Recall of rapidly presented random chess positions is a function of skill. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 3(2), 159–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Griffiths, P. E. (1997). What emotions really are. The problem of psychological categories. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Griffiths, P. E. (2004). Emotions as natural and normative kinds. Philosophy of Science, 71, 901–911.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Haxby, J. V., Hoffman, E. A., & Gobbini, M. I. (2000). The distributed human neural system for face perception. Trends in Cognitive Science, 4, 223–233. doi: 10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01482-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Heberlein, A. S., Adolphs, R., Tranel, D., & Damasio, H. (2004). Cortical regions for judgments of emotions and personality traits from pointlight walkers. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16(7), 1143–1158. doi: 10.1162/0898929041920423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Heelas, P. (1986). Emotion talk across cultures. In R. Harré (Ed.), The social construction of the emotions (pp. 234–266). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  44. Hohwy, J. (2014). The predictive mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Huberle, E., & Karnath, H. O. (2012). The role of temporo-parietal junction (TPJ) in global gestalt perception. Brain, Structure and Function, 217(3), 735–746.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Hurley, S. L. (1998). Consciousness in action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  47. Keltner, D., Ekman, P., Gonzaga, G. C., & Beer, J. (2003). Facial expression of emotion. In R. J. Davidson, K. R. Scherer, & H. H. Goldsmith (Eds.), Handbook of affective sciences (pp. 415–431). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Kveraga, K., Boshyan, J., & Bar, M. (2009). The proactive brain: Using memory-based predictions in visual recognition. In S. Dickinson, M. Tarr, A. Leonardis, & B. Schiele (Eds.), Object categorization: Computer and human vision perspectives (pp. 384–400). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Kveraga, K., Ghuman, A. S., Kassam, K. S., Aminoff, E., Hamalainen, M. S., & Chaumon, M. (2011). Early onset of neural synchronization in the contextual associations network. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(8), 3389–3394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Le Doux, J. (1998). The emotional brain: The mysterious underpinnings of emotional life. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  51. Leopold, D., & Rhodes, G. (2010). A comparative view of face perception. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 124(3), 233–251. doi: 10.1037/a0019460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Lin, M. H., Kwan, V. S. Y., Cheung, A., & Fiske, S. T. (2005). Stereotype content model explains prejudice for an envied outgroup: Scale of anti-Asian American stereotypes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31(1), 34–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Lupyan, G. (2012). Linguistically modulated perception and cognition: The label-feedback hypothesis. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 54. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00054.Google Scholar
  54. Lutz, C. (1986). Emotion words on Ifaluk. In R. Harré (Ed.), The social construction of the emotions (pp. 267–288). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  55. Macpherson, F. (2012). Cognitive penetration of colour experience. Rethinking the issue in light of an indirect mechanism. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 84(1), 24–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Macrae, C. N., & Quadflieg, S. (2010). Perceiving people. In S. T. Fiske, D. T. Gilbert, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology II (pp. 428–463). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
  57. Maley, C. J. (2011). Analog and digital, continuous and discrete. Philosophical Studies, 155(1), 117–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Marchi, F., & Newen, A. (2015). Cognitive penetrability and emotion recognition in human facial expressions. Frontiers in Psychology, 6(828). doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00828.
  59. Martin, D., & Macrae, C. N. (2007). A face with a cue: Exploring the inevitability of person categorization. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37(5), 806–816.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Matsumoto, D., & Ekman, P. (1988). Japanese and Caucasian facial expressions of emotion (JACFEE) [Slides]. San Francisco, CA: San Francisco State University, Department of Psychology, Intercultural and Emotion Research Laboratory.Google Scholar
  61. Nanay, B. (2011). Do we see apples as edible? Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 92, 305–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Nelson, C. A. (2001). The development and neural bases of face recognition. Infant and Child Development, 10(1–2), 3–18. doi: 10.1002/icd.239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Newen, A. (2015). Understanding others—The person model theory. In T. Metzinger & J. M. Windt (Eds.), Open MIND 26. doi: 10.15502/9783958570320.
  64. Newen, A., & Bartels, A. (2007). Animal minds and the possession of concepts. Philosophical Psychology, 20(3), 283–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Newen, A., & Marchi, F. (2016). Concepts and their organizational structure: Concepts are templates based on mental files. In D. Hommen, C. Kann, & T. Osswald (Hg.), Concepts and categorization. Systematic and historical perspectives (pp. 197–227). Münster: Mentis.Google Scholar
  66. Newen, A., Welpinghus, A., & Juckel, G. (2015). Emotion recognition as pattern recognition: The relevance of perception. Mind & Language, 30(2), 187–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Noë, A. (2004). Action in perception. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  68. O’Regan, J. K., & Noë, A. (2001). A sensorimotor account of vision and visual consciousness. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24(5), 883–917.Google Scholar
  69. Pacherie, E. (2005). Perceiving intentions. In J. Sàágua (Ed.), A Explicação da Interpretação Humana (pp. 401–414). Lisbon: Edições Colibri.Google Scholar
  70. Panksepp, J. (1998). Affective neuroscience: The foundations of human and animal emotions. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  71. Panksepp, J. (2000). Emotion as a natural kind within the brain. In M. Lewis & J. M. Haviland-Jones (Eds.), Handbook of emotions (pp. 137–55). New York: Guilford University Press.Google Scholar
  72. Parr, L. A. (2008). Facial expression categorization by chimpanzees using standardized stimuli. Emotion, 8(2), 216–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Parr, L. A., & Heintz, M. (2009). Facial expression recognition in rhesus monkeys, Macaca mulatta. Animal Behavior, 77(6), 1507–1513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Pearson, J., Clifford, C., & Tong, F. (2008). The functional impact of mental imagery on conscious perception. Current Biology, 18(13), 982–986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Proverbio, A. M., Adorni, R., & D’Aniello, G. E. (2011). 250 ms to code for action affordance during observation of manipulable objects. Neuropsychologia, 49, 2711–2717.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Rennig, J., Bilalić, M., Huberle, E., Karnath, H. O., & Himmelbach, M. (2013). The temporo-parietal junction contributes to global gestalt perception-evidence from studies in chess experts. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 28(7), 513.Google Scholar
  77. Roberts, T., & Bruce, V. (1988). Feature saliency in judging the sex and familiarity of faces. Perception, 17(4), 829–840. doi: 10.1068/p170475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Rutherford, M. D., & Kuhlmeier, V. A. (2013). Social perception: Detection and interpretation of animacy, agency, and intention. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Schwitzgebel, E. (2002). A phenomenal, dispositional account of belief. Noûs, 36, 249–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Schyns, P. G., Bonnar, L., & Gosselin, F. (2002). Show me the features! Understanding recognition from the use of visual information. Psychological Science, 13(5), 402–409. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.00472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Siegel, S. (2006). Which properties are represented in perception? In T. S. Gendler & J. Hawthorne (Eds.), Perceptual experience (pp. 481–503). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Siegel, S. (2009). The visual experience of causation. Philosophical Quarterly, 59(236), 519–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Siegel, S. (2010). The contents of visual experience. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  84. Siegel, S. (2012). Cognitive penetrability and perceptual justification. Noûs, 46(2), 201–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Toribio, J. (2015). Visual experience: Rich but impenetrable. Synthese. doi: 10.1007/s11229-015-0889-8.
  86. Trujillo, L. T., Allen, J. J. B., Schnyer, D. M., & Peterson, M. A. (2010). Neurophysiological evidence for the influence of past experience on figure-ground perception. Journal of Vision. doi: 10.1167/10.2.5.
  87. Tye, M. (1995). Ten problems of consciousness: A representational theory of the phenomenal mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  88. v. Savigny, E. (1988/1989). Wittgensteins ,,Philosophische Untersuchungen“. Ein Kommentar für Leser. 2 Bände, Frankfurt a.M.: Klostermann.Google Scholar
  89. van Gelder, T., & Port, R. F. (1995). It’s about time: An overview of the dynamical approach to cognition. In T. van Gelder & R. F. Port (Eds.), Mind as motion: Explorations in the dynamics of cognition (pp. 1–44). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  90. Vetter, P., & Newen, A. (2014). Varieties of cognitive penetration in visual perception. Consciousness and Cognition, 27, 62–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Wagemans, J., Elder, J. H., Kubovy, M., Palmer, S. E., Peterson, M. A., Singh, M., et al. (2012a). A century of Gestalt psychology in visual perception: I. Perceptual grouping and figure-ground organization. Psychological Bulletin, 138(6), 1172–1217.Google Scholar
  92. Wagemans, J., Feldman, J., Gepshtein, S., Kimchi, R., Pomerantz, J. R., van der Helm, P. A., et al. (2012b). A century of Gestalt psychology in visual perception: II. Conceptual and theoretical foundations. Psychological Bulletin, 138(6), 1218–1252.Google Scholar
  93. Welpinghus, A. (2015). Emotions as natural and social kinds. Münster: Mentis.Google Scholar
  94. Welpinghus, A., & Newen, A. (2012). Emotion und Kultur: Wie individuieren wir Emotionen und welche Rolle spielen kulturelle Faktoren dabei? Zeitschrift für Philosophische Forschung, 66(3), 367–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Willis, J., & Todorov, A. (2006). First impressions: Making up your mind after a 100-ms exposure to a face. Psychological Science, 17(7), 592–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Winawer, J., Witthoft, N., Frank, M., Wu, L., Wade, A., & Boroditsky, L. (2007). The Russian blues reveal effects of language on color discrimination. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 104(19), 7780–7785.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Zahavi, D. (2011). Empathy and direct social perception: A phenomenological proposal. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 2(3), 541–558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Zinck, A., & Newen, A. (2008). Classifying emotions: A developmental account. Synthese, 1, 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Philosophy IIRuhr-Universität BochumBochumGermany

Personalised recommendations