, Volume 194, Issue 4, pp 1303–1322

Probabilistic coherence measures: a psychological study of coherence assessment


DOI: 10.1007/s11229-015-0996-6

Cite this article as:
Koscholke, J. & Jekel, M. Synthese (2017) 194: 1303. doi:10.1007/s11229-015-0996-6


Over the years several non-equivalent probabilistic measures of coherence have been discussed in the philosophical literature. In this paper we examine these measures with respect to their empirical adequacy. Using test cases from the coherence literature as vignettes for psychological experiments we investigate whether the measures can predict the subjective coherence assessments of the participants. It turns out that the participants’ coherence assessments are best described by Roche’s (Insights from philosophy, jurisprudence and artificial intelligence, 2013) coherence measure based on Douven and Meijs’ (Synthese 156:405–425, 2007) average mutual support approach and the conditional probability.


Bayesian coherentism Probabilistic coherence measures  Probabilistic support measures Test cases Experimental philosophy 

Funding information

Funder NameGrant NumberFunding Note
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DE)
  • SI 1731/1-1

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Philosophy DepartmentUniversity of OldenburgOldenburgGermany
  2. 2.Institut für PsychologieFernUniversität in HagenHagenGermany

Personalised recommendations