Synthese

pp 1–19

Does functionalism entail extended mind?

Original Research

DOI: 10.1007/s11229-015-0971-2

Cite this article as:
Miyazono, K. Synthese (2015). doi:10.1007/s11229-015-0971-2

Abstract

In discussing the famous case of Otto, a patient with Alzheimer’s disease who carries around a notebook to keep important information, Clark and Chalmers argue that some of Otto’s beliefs are physically realized in the notebook. In other words, some of Otto’s beliefs are extended into the environment. Their main argument is a functionalist one. Some of Otto’s beliefs are physically realized in the notebook because, first, some of the beliefs of Inga, a healthy person who remembers important information in her head, are physically realized in her internal memory storage, and, second, there is no relevant functional difference between the role of the notebook for Otto and the role of the internal memory storage for Inga. The paper presents a new objection to this argument. I call it “the systems reply” to the functionalist argument since it is structurally analogous to the “the systems reply” to Searle’s Chinese room argument. According to the systems reply to the functionalist argument, what actually follows from their argument is not that beliefs of Otto are physically realized in the notebook but rather that the beliefs of the hybrid system consisting of Otto and his notebook are physically realized in the notebook. This paper also discusses Sprevak’s claim that the functionalist argument entails radical versions of extended mental states and shows that his argument is also vulnerable to the systems reply.

Keywords

Extended mind Functionalism Belief Chinese room argument  The systems reply 

Funding information

Funder NameGrant NumberFunding Note
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
  • KAKENHI (15J03906)

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Keio UniversityMinatoJapan

Personalised recommendations