Anderson, R. (2008). Security engineering: A guide to building dependable distributed systems
(2nd ed.). Indianapolis: Wiley.Google Scholar
Barber, E. H. E., Greenwood, J. N., & Matheson, J. A. L. (1963). Report of the royal commission into the failure of kings bridge. Technical report, Victorian Royal Commission into the Failure of Kings Bridge.
Bell, D. E., LaPadula, L. J. (1973). Secure computer systems: Mathematical foundations. Technical Report MTR-2547, MITRE.
Boon, M., & Knuuttila, T. (2009). Models as epistemic tools in engineering sciences. In A. Meijers (Ed.), Philosophy of technology and engineering sciences
(Vol. 9, pp. 693–726)., Handbook of the philosophy of science Amsterdam: Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brooks, F. P, Jr. (1996). The computer scientist as toolsmith II. Communications of the ACM
(3), 61–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cartwright, N. (1983). How the laws of physics lie
. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clausen, J., & Cantwell, J. (2007). Reasoning with safety factor rules. Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology
(1), 55–70.Google Scholar
Constant, II, E. W. (1984). Communities and hierarchies: Structure in the practice of science and technology. In Laudan (1984b), pp. 27–46.
Constant, E. W, I. I. (1999). Reliable knowledge and unreliable stuff. Technology and Culture
(2), 324–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, M. (2010). Distinguishing architects from engineers: A pilot study in differences between engineers and other technologists. In I .van de Poel & D. E.Goldberg (Eds.), Philosophy and engineering: An emerging agenda (pp. 15–30), Vol. 2 of Philosophy of engineering and technology. Dordrecht: Springer.
Ferguson, E. S. (1992). Engineering and the mind’s eye
. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Gainsburg, J., Rodriquez-Lluesma, C., & Bailey, D. E. (2010). A “knowledge profile” of an engineering occupation: Temporal patterns in the use of engineering knowledge. Engineering Studies, 2(3), 197–219.
Helton, J. C., & Oberkampf, W. L. (2004). Alternative representations of epistemic uncertainty. Reliability Engineering and System Safety
, 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoare, C. A. R. (1996). The logic of engineering design. Microprocessing and Microprogramming
, 525–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Houkes, W., & Vermaas, P. E. (2009). Produced to use: Combining two key intuitions on the nature of artefacts. Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology
(2), 123–136.Google Scholar
Hughes, T. P. (1976). The science-technology interaction: The case of high-voltage power transmission systems. Technology and Culture
(4), 646–662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, A. (2009). Hitting the brakes: Engineering design and the production of knowledge
. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kroes, P. (2002). Design methodology and the nature of technical artefacts. Design Studies
, 287–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lakatos, I. (1970). Falsification and the methodology of scientific research programmes. In I. Lakatos & A. Musgrave (Eds.), Criticism and the growth of knowledge
(pp. 91–196). London: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lakatos, I. (1976). Proofs and refutations
. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laudan, R. (1984). Cognitive change in technology and science. In R. Laudan (Ed.), The Nature of Technological Knowledge
. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.Google Scholar
Laudan, R. (Ed.). (1984b). The Nature of Technological Knowledge. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.
Laymon, R. (1989). Applying idealized scientific theories to engineering. Synthese
, 353–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Layton, E. (1971). Mirror-image twins: The communities of science and technology in 19th-century America. Technology and Culture
(4), 562–580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacKenzie, D. (2001). Mechanizing proof: Computing, risk, and trust
. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Marshall, R. D., Pfrang, E. O., Leyendecker, E. V., Woodward, K. A., Reed, R. P., Kasen, M. B., Shives, T. R. (1982). Investigation of the kansas city hyatt regency walkways collapse. Technical Report 143, U.S. Dept. of Commerce, National Bureau of Standards.
Mayo, D. G. (1996). Error and the growth of experimental knowledge
. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLean, J. (1985). A comment on the “basic security theorem” of Bell and LaPadula. Information Processing Letters
, 67–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oddie, G. (1981). Verisimilitude reviewed. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science
, 237–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petroski, H. (1996). Invention by design: How Engineers get from thought to thing
. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Petroski, H. (2012). To forgive design: Understanding failure
. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pirtle, Z. (2010). How the models of engineering tell the truth. In I. van de Poel & D. E. Goldberg (Eds.), Philosophy and engineering: An emerging agenda (pp. 95–108), Vol. 2 of Philosophy of engineering and technology. Dordrecht: Springer.
Polanyi, M. (1958). Personal knowledge: Towards a post-critical philosophy
. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Pols, A. (2010). Transferring responsibility through use plans. In I. van de Poel & D. E. Goldberg (Eds.), Philosophy and engineering: An emerging agenda (pp. 189–203), Vol. 2 of Philosophy of engineering and technology. Dordrecht: Springer.
Popper, K. R. (1959). The logic of scientific discovery
(3rd ed.). London: Routledge. printed 2002.Google Scholar
Popper, K. R. (1963). Conjectures and Refutations (2nd ed.). London: Routledge. printed 2002.
Popper, K. R. (1972). Objective knowledge: An evolutionary approach
. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Popper, K. R. (1977). The worlds 1, 2 and 3. In K. R. Popper & J. C. Eccles (Eds.), The Self and its brain: An argument for interactionism
(pp. 36–50). London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Popper, K. R. (1978). Three worlds. The Tanner Lecture on Human Values. Accessed January 18, 2014, from http://tannerlectures.utah.edu/_documents/a-to-z/p/popper80.pdf
Rapp, F. (1981). Analytical philosophy of technology
. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rittel, H. (1972). On the planning crisis: Systems analysis of the ‘first and second generations’. Bedriftsøkonomen
, 390–396.Google Scholar
Rushby, J. (2013). Mechanized support for assurance case argumentation. In Proceedings of the 1st International workshop on argument for agreement and assurance. London: Springer.
Staples, M. (2014). Critical rationalism and engineering: ontology. Synthese, 191(10), 2255–2279.
van de Poel, I. (2010). Philosophy and engineering: Setting the stage. In I. van de Poel & D. E. Goldberg (Eds.), Philosophy and engineering: An emerging agenda (pp. 1–11), Vol. 2 of Philosophy of engineering and technology. Dordrecht: Springer.
Vermaas, P. E. (2010). Focussing philosophy of engineering: Analyses of technical functions and beyond. In van de Poel and Goldberg (Eds.), Philosophy and engineering: An emerging agenda (pp. 61–72), Vol. 2 of Philosophy of engineering and technology. Dordrecht: Springer.
Vincenti, W. (1990). What engineers know and how they know it
. Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Wimsatt, W. C. (2007). False models as means to truer theories. In Re-engineering philosophy for limited beings: Piecewise approximations to reality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.