Probabilistic measures of coherence: from adequacy constraints towards pluralism
The debate on probabilistic measures of coherence flourishes for about 15 years now. Initiated by papers that have been published around the turn of the millennium, many different proposals have since then been put forward. This contribution is partly devoted to a reassessment of extant coherence measures. Focusing on a small number of reasonable adequacy constraints I show that (i) there can be no coherence measure that satisfies all constraints, and that (ii) subsets of these adequacy constraints motivate two different classes of coherence measures. These classes do not coincide with the common distinction between coherence as mutual support and coherence as relative set-theoretic overlap. Finally, I put forward arguments to the effect that for each such class of coherence measures there is an outstanding measure that outperforms all other extant proposals. One of these measures has recently been put forward in the literature, while the other one is based on a novel probabilistic measure of confirmation.
KeywordsProbabilistic measures of coherence Confirmation measures Probabilistic support
- BonJour, L. (1985). The structure of empirical knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Bovens, L., & Hartmann, S. (2003). Bayesian epistemology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Carnap, R. (1962). Logical foundations of probability (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Fitelson, B. (2004). Two technical corrections to my coherence measure. Retrieved from http://www.fitelson.org/coherence2.pdf.
- Horwich, P. (1982). Probability and evidence. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Joyce, J. (2008). Bayes’ theorem. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Fall 2008 edition). Retrieved from http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2008/entries/bayes-theorem/.
- Keynes, J. (1921). A treatise on probability. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
- Koscholke, J. (2013). Last measure standing. Evaluating test cases for probabilistic coherence measures. Manuscript.Google Scholar
- Lewis, I. C. (1946). An analysis of knowledge and valuation. Chicago: Open Court.Google Scholar
- Meijs, W. (2005). Probabilistic measures of coherence (Ph.D. dissertation, University of Rotterdam, 2005).Google Scholar
- Mortimer, H. (1988). The logic of induction. Paramus, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
- Nozick, R. (1981). Philosophical explanations. Oxford: Clarenden.Google Scholar
- Roche, W. (2013). Coherence and probability. A probabilistic account of coherence. In M. Araszkiewicz & J. Savelka (Eds.), Coherence: Insights from philosophy, jurisprudence and artificial intelligence (pp. 59–91). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
- Roche, W., & Schippers, M. (2013). Coherence, probability, and explanation. Erkenntnis. doi:10.1007/s10670-013-9566-9.
- Schippers, M., & Siebel, M. (2012). Reassessing probabilistic measures of coherence. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
- Schippers, M. (2014a). On the impossibility of measuring coherence. Manuscript.Google Scholar
- Schippers, M. (2014b). Inconsistency and incoherence. The Review of Symbolic Logic. doi:10.1017/S1755020314000203.
- Schippers, M. (2014c). Coherence, striking agreement, and reliability. On a putative vindication of the Shogenji measure. Synthese. doi:10.1007/s11229-014-0488-0.
- Schippers, M., & Siebel, M. (2014). Inconsistent testimonies as a touchstone for coherence measures. Manuscript.Google Scholar