Skip to main content
Log in

Starting from the scenario Euclid–Bolyai–Einstein

  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Our aim is to propose several itineraries which follow the scenario having as a first step Euclid’s Fifth Postulate; as a second step the Bolyai–Lobachevsky’s non-Euclidean geometries and as a third step Einstein’s relativity theory. The role of Euclid’s fifth postulate is successively assumed by Archimedes’ axiom; Zermelo’s choice axiom; Cantor’s continuum hypothesis; von Neumann’s foundation axiom for set theory; Church–Turing thesis and Turing’s computability; the validity of classical logic under the form of the principles of identity, non-contradiction and excluded middle; the macroscopic universe assumed as form of existence, including the fact that humans are macroscopic beings; human language and semiosis assumed as the unique way to approach understanding and communication; the old Greek ideal of order, symmetry and harmony, adopted for representation of the world in Art and Poetry. The common denominator of these starting steps is the fact that they all correspond to the sensorial-empirical perception of the world. We point out the strong interaction among the steps corresponding, in these different itineraries, to Einstein’s relativity theory. We infer in this way the need of a transdisciplinary approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aczel, P. (1988). Non-well-founded sets, CSLI Lecture Notes 14, Stanford.

  • Brown, D. J., & Robinson, A. (1975). Non-standard exchange economies. Econometrica, 41(1), 41–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, J. C. H. (2002). Quantum computation and natural language. Hamburg.

  • Debreu, G. (1974). Four aspects of the mathematical theory of economic equilibrium. In Proceedings of the International Congress of Mathematicians (pp. 65–77). Vancouver.

  • de Beaugrande, R. (1988). Quantum aspects of artistic perception. Poetics, 17, 305–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eggington, W. (2013). On Borges, particles and the paradox of the perceived, The Stone. http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com.

  • Favrholdt, D. (1993). Niels Bohr’s views concerning language. Semiotica, 94, 5–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mandelbrot, B. (1982). The fractal geometry of nature. New York: W.H. Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stolz, O. (1885). Vorlesungenüber Allgemeine Arithmetik. Leipzig: Teubner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suppes, P. (1977). Is visual space Euclidean? Erkenntnis, 36, 307–421.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodin, H. W. (1999). The axiom of determinacy, forcing axioms and the non-stationary ideal. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Solomon Marcus.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Marcus, S. Starting from the scenario Euclid–Bolyai–Einstein. Synthese 192, 2139–2149 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-013-0346-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-013-0346-5

Keywords

Navigation