A modal ontology of properties for quantum mechanics
Our purpose in this paper is to delineate an ontology for quantum mechanics that results adequate to the formalism of the theory. We will restrict our aim to the search of an ontology that expresses the conceptual content of the recently proposed modal-Hamiltonian interpretation, according to which the domain referred to by non-relativistic quantum mechanics is an ontology of properties. The usual strategy in the literature has been to focus on only one of the interpretive problems of the theory and to design an interpretation to solve it, leaving aside the remaining difficulties. On the contrary, our aim in the present work is to formulate a “global” solution, according to which different problems can be adequately tackled in terms of a single ontology populated of properties, in which systems are bundles of properties. In particular, we will conceive indistinguishability between bundles as a relation derived from indistinguishability between properties, and we will show that states, when operating on combinations of indistinguishable bundles, act as if they were symmetric with no need of a symmetrization postulate.
KeywordsQuantum Mechanics Modal-Hamiltonian interpretation Bundles of properties Contextuality Indistinguishability
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- da Costa N., French S., Krause D. (1992) The Schrödinger problem. In: Bitbol M., Darrigol O. (Eds.) Erwin Schrödinger: Philosophy and the birth of quantum mechanics. Editions Frontières, ParisGoogle Scholar
- da Costa N., Krause D. (1999) Set-theoretical models for quantum systems. In: dalla Chiara M. L., Giuntini R., Laudisa F. (Eds.) Language, quantum, music. Kluwer, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
- dalla Chiara M. L., di Francia G. T. (1993) Individuals, kinds and names in physics. In: Corsi G., dalla Chiara M. L., Ghirardi G. C. (Eds.) Bridging the gap: Philosophy, mathematics and physics. Kluwer, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
- dalla Chiara M. L., di Francia G. T. (1995) Identity questions from quantum theory. In: Gavroglu K., Stachel J., Wartofski M. W. (Eds.) Physics, philosophy and the scientific community. Kluwer, DorrechtGoogle Scholar
- Dieks, D., & Lombardi, O. (2012). Modal interpretations of quantum mechanics. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.) The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (fall 2012 edn.). Retrieved October 27, 2012 from http://plato.stanford.edu, forthcoming.
- Dieks, D., Vermaas, P. (Eds.) (1998) The modal interpretation of quantum mechanics. Kluwer Academic Publishers, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
- French S. (1998) On the withering away of physical objects. In: Castellani E. (Ed.) Interpreting bodies: Classical and quantum objects in modern physics. Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp 93–113Google Scholar
- Kneale W., Kneale M. (1962) The development of logic. Clarendon Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
- Kochen S., Specker E. (1967) The problem of hidden variables in quantum mechanics. Journal of Mathematics and Mechanics 17: 59–87Google Scholar
- Lévi-Leblond J. M. (1974) The pedagogical role and epistemological significance of group theory in quantum mechanics. Nuovo Cimento 4: 99–143Google Scholar
- Maudlin T. (1998) Part and whole in quantum mechanics. In: Castellani E. (Ed.) Interpreting bodies: Classical and quantum objects in modern physics. Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp 46–60Google Scholar
- Menzel, C. (2007). Actualism. In: E. N. Zalta (Ed.) The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (spring 2007 edn.). Retrieved June 4, 2007 from http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2007/entries/actualism/.
- Post H. (1963) Individuality and physics. Listener 70: 534–537Google Scholar
- Teller P. (1998) Quantum mechanics and haecceities. In: Castellani E. (Ed.) Interpreting bodies: Classical and quantum objects in modern physics. Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp 114–141Google Scholar
- van Fraassen B. C. (1972) A formal approach to the philosophy of science. In: Colodny R. (Ed.) Paradigms and paradoxes: The philosophical challenge of the quantum domain. University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh, pp 303–366Google Scholar