Abstract
Traditional scientific views of rationality are couched in economic terms; choosing an option that does not maximize expectancy is irrational. The construct has been extended metaphorically so that the term “irrational” now describes any decision deemed foolish by the evaluator. For everyday decisions that do not involve money, a decision maker’s utilities are generally not known to an onlooker. Therefore, the pejorative label may be applied inappropriately because the evaluation is distorted by incorrect assessment of the decision maker’s goals. We tie this linguistic confusion to the predominance of gambling studies within decision making research. For noneconomic decisions, we propose an alternative definition, one inspired by a theory of everyday decisions. We label a decision irrational if is inconsistent with a policy previously established by the decision maker. The hierarchical structure of everyday decisions, along with the descriptive multiattribute utility model, are core elements in the theory presented by Weiss et al. (2010 Theory and Decision, 68, 101–114). The theory holds that fast changing considerations are a crucial element in the evaluation of decision options. The momentary salience attached to a consequence can change with current, often fleeting circumstances. An option that would usually be rejected can quickly become too tempting to resist. Most people exhibit this kind of irrationality, violating a personal policy, some of the time—and they are not necessarily foolish to do so.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abdellaoui M., Attema A.E., Bleichrodt H. (2009) Intertemporal tradeoffs for gains and losses: An experimental measurement of discounted utility. The Economic Journal 120: 845–866
Ariely D. (2010) The upside of irrationality: The unexpected benefits of defying logic. Harper, New York
Ariely D., Loewenstein G. (2006) The heat of the moment: The effect of sexual arousal on sexual decision making. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 19: 87–98
Camerer C., Babcock L., Loewenstein G., Thaler R.H. (1997) Labor supply of New York cabdrivers: One day at a time. Quarterly Journal of Economics 112: 407–442
Coombs C. (1950) Psychological scaling without a unit of measurement. Psychological Review 57: 145–158
Dawes R.M. (1988) Rational choice in an uncertain world. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, San Diego
Dawes R.M. (2001) Everyday irrationality. Westview Press, Boulder
Edwards W. (1954) The theory of decision making. Psychological Bulletin 51: 380–417
Geronimus A.T. (2003) Damned if you do: Culture, identity, privilege, and teenage childbearing in the United States. Social Science and Medicine 57: 881–893
Gigerenzer G. (2008) Rationality for mortals. Oxford University Press, New York
The ABC Research Group: (1999) Simple heuristics that make us smart. Oxford University Press, New York
Gollwitzer P.M. (1999) Implementation intentions: Strong effects of simple plans. American Psychologist 54: 493–503
Hoffman P. (1960) The paramorphic representation of clinical judgment. Psychological Bulletin 57: 116–131
Loewenstein G., O’Donoghue T., Rabin M. (2003) Projection bias in predicting future utility. Quarterly Journal of Economics 118: 1209–1248
Loewenstein G., Schkade D. (1999) Wouldn’t it be nice? Predicting future feelings. In: Kahneman D., Diener E., Schwartz N. (eds) Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology. Russell Sage Foundation, New York, pp 85–105
Mosteller F., Nogee P. (1951) An experimental measure of utility. Journal of Political Economy 59: 371–404
von Neumann J., Morgenstern O. (1944) Theory of games and economic behavior. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Simon H. (1982) Models of bounded rationality. MIT Press, Cambridge
Van Boven L., Loewenstein G. (2003) Social projection of transient visceral feelings. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 29: 1159–1168
Wansink B., Cheney M.M. (2005) Super bowls: Serving bowl size and food consumption. Journal of the American Medical Association 293: 1727–1728
Weiss, J.W., Weiss, D.J. (eds) (2009) A science of decision making: The legacy of Ward Edwards. Oxford University Press, New York
Weiss J.W., Weiss D.J., Edwards W. (2009) Big decisions, little decisions: The hierarchy of everyday life. In: Weiss J.W., Weiss D.J. (eds) A science of decision making: The legacy of Ward Edwards. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 451–460
Weiss J.W., Weiss D.J., Edwards W. (2010) A descriptive multi-attribute utility model for everyday decisions. Theory and Decision 68: 101–114
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Weiss, J.W., Weiss, D.J. Irrational: at the moment. Synthese 189 (Suppl 1), 173–183 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-012-0112-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-012-0112-0