Associations between psychologists’ thinking styles and accuracy on a diagnostic classification task
- 623 Downloads
The present study investigated whether individual differences between psychologists in thinking styles are associated with accuracy in diagnostic classification. We asked novice and experienced clinicians to classify two clinical cases of clients with two co-occurring psychological disorders. No significant difference in diagnostic accuracy was found between the two groups, but when combining the data from novices and experienced psychologists accuracy was found to be negatively associated with certain decision making strategies and with a higher self-assessed ability and preference for a rational thinking style. Our results underscore the idea that it might be fruitful to look for explanations of differences in the accuracy of diagnostic judgments in individual differences between psychologists (such as in thinking styles or decision making strategies used), rather than in experience level.
KeywordsDiagnostic classification Thinking style Decision making
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.
- American Psychiatric Association: (2000) Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th Ed., text rev.). Author, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
- Corbin J., McElroy T., Black C. (2010) Memory reflected in our decisions: Higher working memory capacity predicts greater bias in risky choice. Judgment and Decision Making 5: 110–115Google Scholar
- Frances A., Ross R. (2001) DSM-IV-TRTM case studies: A clinical guide to differentia diagnosis. American Psychiatric Publishing, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
- Inquisit 18.104.22.168 [Computer software]. (2010). Seattle, WA: Millisecond software.Google Scholar