Abstract
The present study investigated whether individual differences between psychologists in thinking styles are associated with accuracy in diagnostic classification. We asked novice and experienced clinicians to classify two clinical cases of clients with two co-occurring psychological disorders. No significant difference in diagnostic accuracy was found between the two groups, but when combining the data from novices and experienced psychologists accuracy was found to be negatively associated with certain decision making strategies and with a higher self-assessed ability and preference for a rational thinking style. Our results underscore the idea that it might be fruitful to look for explanations of differences in the accuracy of diagnostic judgments in individual differences between psychologists (such as in thinking styles or decision making strategies used), rather than in experience level.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
American Psychiatric Association: (2000) Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th Ed., text rev.). Author, Washington, DC
Corbin J., McElroy T., Black C. (2010) Memory reflected in our decisions: Higher working memory capacity predicts greater bias in risky choice. Judgment and Decision Making 5: 110–115
Delaney P., Sahakyan L. (2007) Unexpected costs of high working memory capacity following directed forgetting and contextual change manipulations. Memory and Cognition 35: 1074–1082
Elstein A. S., Schwarz A. (2002) Clinical problem solving and diagnostic decision making: Selective review of the cognitive literature. British Medical Journal 324: 729–732
Epstein S. (2010) Demystifying intuition: What it is, what it does, and how it does it. psychological Inquiry 21: 295–312
Evans J. St. B. T. (2008) Dual-processing accounts of reasoning, judgment, and social cognition. Annual Review of Psychology 59: 255–278
Fletcher J. M., Marks A. D. G., Hine D. W. (2011) Working memory capacity and cognitive styles in decision making. Personality and individual differences 50: 1136–1141
Frances A., Ross R. (2001) DSM-IV-TRTM case studies: A clinical guide to differentia diagnosis. American Psychiatric Publishing, Washington, DC
Garb H. N. (1996) The representativeness and past-behavior heuristics in clinical judgment. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice 27: 272–277
Garb H. N. (1998) Studying the clinician: Judgment research and psychological assessment. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC
Garb H.N. (2005) Clinical judgment and decision making. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology 1: 67–89
Gigerenzer G., Gaissmaier W. (2011) Heuristic decision making. Annual Review of Psychology 62: 451–482
Inquisit 3.0.4.0 [Computer software]. (2010). Seattle, WA: Millisecond software.
Kim N. S., Ahn W. (2002) Clinical psychologists’ theory-based representations of mental disorders predict their diagnostic reasoning and memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology.: General 131: 451–476
Marewski J. N., Gaissmaier W., Gigerenzer G. (2010) Good judgments do not require complex cognition. Cognitive processing 11: 103–121
Nakagawa S. (2004) A farewell to Bonferroni: The problems of low statistical power and publication bias. Behavioural Ecology 15: 1044–1045
Pacini R., Epstein S. (1999) The relation of rational and experiential information processing styles to personality, basic beliefs, and the ratio-bias phenomenon. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 76: 972–987
Pretz J. E., Totz K. S. (2007) Measuring individual differences in affective, heuristic, and holistic intuition. Personality and Individual Differences 43: 1247–1257
Spengler P. M., White M. J., Ægisdóttir S., Maugherman A. S., Anderson L. A., Cook R. S. et al (2009) The meta-analysis of clinical judgment project: Effects of experience on judgment accuracy. The Counseling Psychologist 37: 350–399
Srivastava A., Grube M. (2009) Does intuition have a role in psychiatric diagnosis?. Psychiatric Quarterly 2: 99–106
Vermande M. M., Vanden Bercken J. H., De Bruyn E. E. (1996) Effects of diagnostic classification systems on clinical hypothesis-generation. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment 18: 49–70
Witteman C., Vanden Bercken J., Claes L., Godoy A. (2009) Assessing rational and intuitive thinking styles. European Journal of Psychological Assessment 25: 39–47
Open Access
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
About this article
Cite this article
Aarts, A.A., Witteman, C.L.M., Souren, P.M. et al. Associations between psychologists’ thinking styles and accuracy on a diagnostic classification task. Synthese 189 (Suppl 1), 119–130 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-012-0081-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-012-0081-3