Laws and constrained kinds: a lesson from motor neuroscience
In this paper, I want to explore the question of whether or not there are laws in psychology. Jaegwon Kim has argued (Supervenience and mind. MIT press, Cambridge; 1993; Mind in a physical world. MIT press, Cambridge 1998) that there are no laws in psychology that contain reference to multiply realized kinds, because statements about such kinds fail to be projectible. After reviewing Kim’s argument for this claim, I show how his conclusion hinges on a hidden assumption: that a kind can only feature in a projectible statement if it is defined by an internal physical property. This assumption, however, is false: constrained kinds can feature in projectible statements, and yet they are not defined by any set of internal physical properties. I suggest that many mental terms actually refer to constrained kinds, and give an example from motor neuroscience of a constrained kind that is multiply realizable and “projectible”: the intention to move voluntarily in a specific direction.
KeywordsLaws Multiple Realizability Projectibility Constrained Kinds Motor Neuroscience
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Bizzi E., Accornero N., Chapplel W., Hogan N. (1984) Posture control and trajectory formation during arm movement. Journal of Neuroscience 4: 2738–2744Google Scholar
- Block N. (1997) Anti-reductionism slaps back. Philosophical Perspectives 11: 107–132Google Scholar
- Block, N. (forthcoming). Functional reduction. In T. Hogan, M. Sabates & D. Sosa (Eds.), Supervenience in Mind. Cambridge: MIT Press. http://www.nyu.edu/gsas/dept/philo/faculty/block/papers/Kimfestschrift.pdf. Pre-publication version. Accessed 5 Jan 2011.
- Boussaoud D. (2005) The premotor cortex: From attention to intention. In: Freund et al. H. J. (eds) Higher-order motor disorders: From neuroanatomy and neurobiology to clinical neurology. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Boyd R. (1999) Homestasis, species, and higher taxa. In: Wilson R. A. (eds) Species: New interdisciplinary essays. MIT press, Cambridge, MA, pp 141–186Google Scholar
- Caminiti R., Johnson P. B., Galli C., Ferraina S., Burnod Y. (1991) Making arm movements within different parts of space: The premotor and motor cortical representation of a coordinate system for reaching visual targets. The Journal of Neuroscience 11(5): 1182–1197Google Scholar
- Caminiti R., Johnson P. B., Urbano A. (1980) Making arm movements within different parts of space: Dynamic aspect in the primate motor cortex. Journal of Neuroscience 10(7): 2039–2058Google Scholar
- Chakrabarty S., Martin J. H. (2000) Postnatal development of the motor representation in primary motor cortex. Journal of Neurophysiology 84: 2582–2594Google Scholar
- Evarts, E. V. (1981). Role of motor cortex in voluntary movements in primates. In Handbook of physiology: The nervous system. Section 1, Part 2 (Vol. 2, pp. 1083–1120). Bethesda, MD: American Physiological Society.Google Scholar
- Freund H. J., Jeannerod M., Hallett M., Leiguarda R. (2005) Higher-order motor disorders: From neuroanatomy and neurobiology to clinical neurology. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Fodor J. A. (1994) The elm and the expert: Mentalese and its semantics. MIT press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
- Fodor J.A. (1997) Special sciences: Still autonomous after all these years. Philosophical perspectives 11: 149–163Google Scholar
- Gazzaniga M. (1998) The new cognitive neurosciences. MIT press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
- Georgopoulos A. P., Kalaska J. F., Caminiti R., Massey J. T. (1982) On the relations between the direction of two-dimensional arms movements and cell discharge in primate motor cortex. Journal of Neuroscience 2: 1527–1537Google Scholar
- Georgopoulos A. P., Kalaska J. F., Massey J. T. (1981) Spatial trajectories and reaction times of aimed movements: Effects of practice, uncertainty, and change in target location. Journal of Neurophysiology 46: 725–743Google Scholar
- Georgopoulos A. P., Kettner R. E., Schwartz A. B. (1988) Primate motor cortex and free arm movements to visual targets in three-dimensional space: II. coding of the direction of movement by a neuronal population. Journal of Neuroscience 8: 2928–2937Google Scholar
- Gillett C. (2003). The metaphysics of realization, multiple realizability, and the special sciences. The Journal of Philosophy 100(11):591–603.Google Scholar
- Grush R. (2004) The emulation theory of representation: Motor control, imagery, and perception. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27(3): 377–396Google Scholar
- Kandel, E. R., Schwartz, J. H., & Jessell, T. M. (2000). Principles of neural science (Chaps. 33–43 specifically). Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
- Kim J. (1998) Mind in a physical world. MIT press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
- Ljubisavljevic, M. (2006). Transcranial magnetic stimulation and the motor learning-associated cortical plasticity. Experimental Brain Research, 173(2), 215–222. doi:10.1007/s00221-006-0538-z.
- Nitsche, M. A., Roth, A., Kuo, M., Fischer, A. K., Liebetanz, D., Lang, N., Tergau, F., et al. (2007). Timing-dependent modulation of associative plasticity by general network excitability in the human motor cortex. Journal of Neuroscience, 27(14), 3807–3812. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5348-06.2007.Google Scholar
- Salinas, E., & Abbott, L. F. (1994). Vector reconstruction from firing rates. Journal of Computational Neuroscience, 1(1–2), 89–107. doi:10.1007/BF00962720.
- Schiber M. H. (2001) Constraints of somatotopic organization in the primary motor cortex. Journal of Neurophysiology 86(5): 2125–2143Google Scholar
- Shapiro, L. (2002). Neural plasticity and multiple realizability. In Presentation given at the Society for Philosophy and Psychology, Edmonton, 2002. http://philosophy.wisc.edu/shapiro/papers/neural%20plasticity%20SPP.htm
- Shapiro L. (2004) The mind incarnate. MIT press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
- Towl, B. N. (2010). Spurious causal kinds: A problem for the causal-power conception of kinds. Philosophia, 38, 217.Google Scholar
- Ward N. S. (2006) The neural substrates of motor recovery after focal damage to the central nervous system. Archives of Physical Medical Rehabilitation 87(12 suppl 2): S30–S35Google Scholar
- Wilson R. A. (1999) Realism, essence, and kind: Resuscitating species essentialism?. In: Wilson R. A. (eds) Species. MIT press, Cambridge, MA, pp 187–208Google Scholar
- Witmer G. (2003) Multiple realizability and psychological laws. In: Walter S., Heckmann H.-D. (eds) Physicalism and mental causation: The metaphysics of mind and action. Imprint Academic, Thorverton, UKGoogle Scholar