Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Or we can be philosophers: a response to Barbara Forrest

  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article is a response to Barbara Forrest’ 2011 Synthese article, “On the Non-Epistemology of Intelligent Design.” Forrest offers an account of my philosophical work that consists almost entirely of personal attacks, excursions into my religious pilgrimage, and misunderstandings and misrepresentations of my work as well as of certain philosophical issues. Not surprisingly, the Synthese editors include a disclaimer in the front matter of the special issue in which Forrest’s article was published. In my response, I address three topics: (1) My interest in Intelligent Design (ID) and public education and why as a Thomist I have grown more skeptical and explicitly critical of ID over the years, (2) the sorts of philosophical mistakes with which Forrest’s article is teeming, and (3) my Christian faith, religious exclusivism, and interfaith dialogue.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aquinas, T. (1920). Summa theologica (Fathers of the English Dominican Province, trans., 2nd, revised, online edn.). Retrieved January 31, 2011, from http://www.newadvent.org/summa/index.html.

  • Aquinas, T. (1999). On human nature. In T. S. Hibbs (Ed.), Indianapolis: Hackett.

  • Aristotle. (1986). De anima (on the soul) (H. Lawson-Tancred, trans.). New York: Penguin Books.

  • Ashley B., Moraczewksi B. (1994) Is the biological subject of human rights present from conception?. In: Cataldo P. J., Moraczewski A. (eds) The fetal tissue issue: Medical and ethical aspects. Pope John Center, Braintree, MA, pp 33–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Barr S. (2006) The miracle of evolution. First Things 160: 30–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckwith F. J. (1985) Baha’i. Bethany House, Minneapolis

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckwith, F. J. (1988–1989). Utilitarian arguments, abortion rights, and Justice Blackmun’s dissent in Webster: Some philosophical observations. In Simon Greenleaf Review of Law and Religion: A Scholarly Forum Interrelating Law, Theology and Human Rights, 8, 5–24.

  • Beckwith F. J. (1989) David Hume’s argument against miracles: A critical analysis. University Press of America, Lanham, MD

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckwith F. J. (1992a) Personal bodily rights, abortion, and unplugging the violinist. International Philosophical Quarterly 32(1): 105–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beckwith F. J. (1992b) Abortion. In: Harrison R. K. (eds) Encyclopedia of Biblical and Christian ethics. Revised edition. Thomas Nelson, Nashville, pp 3–4

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckwith F. J. (1992c) Civil rights. In: Harrison R. K. (eds) Encyclopedia of Biblical and Christian ethics. Revised edition. Thomas Nelson, Nashville, pp 73–75

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckwith F. J. (1992d) Euthanasia. In: Harrison R. K. (eds) Encyclopedia of Biblical and Christian ethics. Revised edition. Thomas Nelson, Nashville, pp 138–139

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckwith F. J. (1994) Separation of guru and state? The influence of New Age thinking on public education. In: Bauman M., Hall D. W. (eds) God and Caesar. Christian Publications, Camp Hill, PA, pp 285–317

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckwith F. J. (1995a) From personhood to autonomy: The shifting legal focus in the abortion debate. In: Cameron N., Schiedermayer D., Kilner J. (eds) Bioethics and the future of medicine. Eerdmans, Grand Rapids, MI, pp 187–198

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckwith F. J. (1995b) Pluralism, tolerance, and abortion rights. In: McKenna G., Feingold S. (eds) Taking sides: Clashing views on controversial political issues (9th ed.) McGraw-Hill, New York, pp 272–277

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckwith F. J. (1996) The ethics of referral kickbacks and self-referral and the HMO physician as gatekeeper: An ethical analysis. Journal of Social Philosophy 28(3): 41–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beckwith F. J. (1999a) The “nobody deserves his or her talents argument for affirmative action”: A critical analysis. Social Theory and Practice 25(1): 53–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beckwith F. J. (1999b) Disagreement without debate: The Republican party platform and the human life amendment plank. Nexus: A Journal of Opinion 4: 113–133

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckwith F. J. (2000) Is statecraft soulcraft? Faith, politics, and legal neutrality. In: Cameron N., Daniels S., White B. (eds) Bioengagement: Making a Christian difference through bioethics today. Eerdmans, Grand Rapids, MI, pp 113–131

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckwith F. J. (2001a) Law, religion, and the metaphysics of abortion: A reply to Simmons. Journal of Church and State 43(1): 19–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beckwith F. J. (2001b) Mormon theism, the traditional Christian concept of God, and Greek philosophy: A critical analysis. Journal of the Evangelical Theological Society 44(4): 671–695

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckwith F. J. (2002) Cloning and reproductive liberty. Nevada Law Journal 3(1): 61–87

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckwith F. J. (2003a) Law, Darwinism, and public education: The establishment clause and the challenge of intelligent design. Rowman and Littlefield, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckwith F. J. (2003b) Public education, religious establishment, and the challenge of intelligent design. Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics, and Public Policy 17(2): 461–519

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckwith F. J. (2003c) Science and religion twenty years after McLean v. Arkansas: Evolution, public education, and the new challenge of intelligent design. Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy 26(2): 455–499

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckwith F. J. (2003d) When you come to a fork in the road, take it? Abortion, personhood, and the jurisprudence of neutrality. Journal of Church and State 44(3): 485–487

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beckwith F. J. (2004) Thomson’s “equal reasonableness” argument for abortion rights: A critique. American Journal of Jurisprudence 49: 118–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beckwith, F. J. (2004–2005). Rawls’s dangerous idea? Liberalism, evolution and the legal requirement of religious neutrality in public schools. Journal of Law and Religion, 20(2), 423–458.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckwith F. J. (2005a) Gimme that ol’ time separation: A review essay. Chapman Law Review 8(1): 309–327

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckwith F. J. (2005b) Sects in the city: Mormonism and the philosophical perils of being a missionary faith. Southern Baptist Journal of Theology 9(2): 14–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckwith F. J. (2005c) Arguments from bodily rights: A critical analysis. In: Boonin D., Oddie G. (eds) What’s wrong? Applied ethicists and their critics. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 108–114

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckwith F. J. (2006a) It’s the epistemology, stupid! science, public schools, and what counts as knowledge. In: Dembski W. A. (eds) Darwin’s nemesis: Phillip Johnson and the intelligent design movement. IVP Academic, Downers Grove, IL, pp 105–116

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckwith F. J. (2006b) Taking theology seriously: The status of the religious beliefs of judicial nominees for the federal bench. Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics, and Public Policy 20(1): 455–471

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckwith F. J. (2006c) The court of disbelief: The constitution’s article VI religious test prohibition and the judiciary’s religious motive analysis. Hastings Constitutional Law Quarterly 33(2,3): 337–360

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckwith F. J. (2006d) Defending abortion philosophically: A review of David Boonin’s a defense of abortion. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 31: 177–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beckwith F. J. (2007a) Defending life: A moral and legal case against abortion choice. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Beckwith F. J. (2007b) Dawson, Joseph Martin. In: Finkelman Paul (eds) Encyclopedia of American civil liberties. Taylor and Francis, New York, pp 397–398

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckwith F. J. (2007c) Edwards v. Aguillard 382 U.S. 578 (1987). In: Finkelman Paul (eds) Encyclopedia of American civil liberties. Taylor and Francis, New York, pp 480–482

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckwith F. J. (2007d) Epperson v. Arkansas 393 U.S. 97 (1968). In: Finkelman Paul (eds) Encyclopedia of American civil liberties. Taylor and Francis, New York, pp 511–512

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckwith F. J. (2007e) Planned Parenthood v. Casey, 112 S. Ct. 2791 (1992). In: Finkelman Paul (eds) Encyclopedia of American civil liberties. Taylor and Francis, New York, pp 1174–1175

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckwith, F. J. (2007f). When the saint goes swearing in. In First things. Online, May 24, 2007. Retrieved February 1, 2011, from http://www.firstthings.com/onthesquare/2007/05/when-the-saints-goes-swearing-.

  • Beckwith F. J. (2007g) Bioethics, the Christian citizen, and the pluralist game. Christian bioethics 13: 159–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beckwith, F. J. (2008–2009). Must theology sit in the back of secular bus? The federal courts’ view of religion and its status as knowledge. Journal of Law and Religion, 24(2), 547–568.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckwith F. J. (2009a) Return to Rome: Confessions of an Evangelical Catholic. Brazos Press, Grand Rapids, MI

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckwith F. J. (2009b) Faith, reason, and the Christian university: What John Paul II can teach Christian academics. Logos: A Journal of Catholic Thought and Culture 12(3): 53–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beckwith F. J. (2009c) The courts, natural rights, and religious claims as knowledge. Santa Clara Law Review 49(2): 429–458

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckwith F. J. (2009d) Carey v. population services international (1977). In: Hudson D. L., Schultz D. A., Vile J. R. (eds) Encyclopedia of the first amendment. Congressional Quarterly Press, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckwith F. J. (2009e) Mount healthy city school Dist. Bd. Of Educ. v. Doyle (1977). In: Hudson D. L., Schultz D. A., Vile J. R. (eds) Encyclopedia of the first amendment. Congressional Quarterly Press, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckwith F. J. (2009f) McGowan v. Maryland (1961). In: Hudson D. L., Schultz D. A., Vile J. R. (eds) Encyclopedia of the first amendment. Congressional Quarterly Press, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckwith F. J. (2009g) Meek v. Pittenger (1975). In: Hudson D. L., Schultz D. A., Vile J. R. (eds) Encyclopedia of the first amendment. Congressional Quarterly Press, Washington D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckwith, F. J. (2009–2010). How to be an anti-intelligent design advocate. University of St. Thomas Journal of Law and Public Policy 4(1), 35–65.

  • Beckwith F. J. (2010a) Guidance for doting and peeping Thomists: A review essay of Aquinas: A Beginner’s guide. Philosophia Christi 12(2): 429–439

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckwith F. J. (2010b) Politics for Christians: Statecraft as soulcraft. InterVarsity, Downers Grove, IL

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckwith, F. J. (2010c). Intelligent design, Thomas Aquinas, and the ubiquity of final causes. BioLogos Foundation, 22 May 2010. Retrieved January 30, 2011, from http://biologos.org/uploads/projects/beckwith_scholarly_essay.pdf.

  • Beckwith F. J. (2010d) Dignity never been photographed: Scientific materialism, enlightenment liberalism, and Steven Pinker. Ethics and medicine: An international journal of bioethics 26(2): 93–110

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckwith, F. J. (2010e). Arguments from bodily rights: A critical analysis. In L. Vaughn (Ed.), Contemporary moral arguments: Readings in ethical issues (pp. 200–207). New York: Oxford University Press.

  • Beckwith F. J. (2010f) Politics, Evangelicals, and the unavoidability of metaphysics. In: Ryden David K. (eds) Is the good book good enough? Evangelical perspectives public policy. Lexington books, Lanham, MD, pp 225–235

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckwith, F. J. (2011a). The human being, a person of substance: A response to Dean Stretton, In S. Napier (Ed.), Persons, moral worth, and embryos: A critical analysis of pro-choice arguments from philosophy, law, and science. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.

  • Beckwith, F. J. (2011b). Mormonism, natural law, and constitutional democracy: Reflections on the Romney candidacy. In J. Baker (Ed.), Sowing the fields of peacemakers: Essays on Mormon philosophy and theology in honor of David L. Paulsen. Draper, UT: Kofford Books.

  • Beckwith, F. J. (2012a) Bork, Robert. In D. L. Hudson & J. R. Vile (Eds.), Encyclopedia of the fourth amendment. Washington, DC.: Congressional Quarterly Press.

  • Beckwith, F. J. (2012b). Comstock act. In D. L. Hudson & J. R. Vile (Eds.), Encyclopedia of the Fourth Amendment. Washington, DC.: Congressional Quarterly Press.

  • Beckwith, F. J. (2012c). Greenawalt, Ken. In D. L. Hudson & J. R. Vile (Eds.), Encyclopedia of the fourth amendment. Washington, DC.: Congressional Quarterly Press.

  • Beckwith, F. J. (2012d). Posner, Richard. In D. L. Hudson & J. R. Vile (Eds.), Encyclopedia of the fourth amendment. Washington, DC.: Congressional Quarterly Press.

  • Beckwith, F. J., Jones, T. (eds) (1997) Affirmative action: Social justice or reverse discrimination?. Prometheus books, Amherst, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckwith, F. J., & Laycock, D. (2005, September 26). Is teaching intelligent design legal? In Legal affairs. Retrieved January 30, 2011, from http://www.legalaffairs.org/webexclusive/debateclub_id0905.msp.

  • Beckwith, F. J., Mosser, C., Owen, P. (eds) (2002) The new Mormon challenge: Responding to the latest defenses of a fast-growing movement. Zondervan, Grand Rapids, MI

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckwith F.J., Parrish S.E. (1991) The Mormon concept of God: A philosophical analysis. Studies in American religion. (Vol. 55). Edwin Mellen Press, Lewiston, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckwith F. J., Peppin J. (2000) Physician-value neutrality: A critique. Journal of Law, Medicine, and Ethics 28(1): 67–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beckwith, F. J., Pojman, L. P. (eds) (1998) The abortion controversy 25 years after Roe v. Wade: A Reader (2nd ed.). Wadsworth, Belmont, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Behe M. (1996) Darwin’s black box. The Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Boonin D. (2002) A defense of abortion. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Branch, G., & Fetzer, J. H. (Eds.). (2011). Evolution and its rivals [Special issue]. Synthese, 179(1).

  • Budziszewski J. (2009) The line through the heart: Natural law as fact, theory, and sign of contradiction. ISI Books, Wilmington, DE

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll W. E. (2000) Creation, evolution, and Thomas Aquinas. Revue des Questions Scientifiques 171: 319–347

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll W. E. (2006) At the mercy of chance? Evolution and the Catholic tradition. Revue des Questions Scientifiques 177: 179–204

    Google Scholar 

  • Colb, S. F. (2001). A creeping theocracy: How the U.S. Government uses its power to enforce religious principles. FindLaw’s Writ. Retrieved January 31, 2011, from http://writ.news.findlaw.com/colb/20011121.html.

  • Craig W. L. (1979) The kalam cosmological argument. Macmillan, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dembski W. A. (1998) The design inference. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dembski W. A. (2001) No free lunch. Rowman and Littlefield, Lanham, MD

    Google Scholar 

  • Feser E. (2008) The last superstition. St. Augustine’s Press, South Bend, IN

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher A. (1991) When did I begin? revisited. Linacre Quarterly 58: 59–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Forrest B. (2000) The possibility of meaning in human evolution. Zygon 35(4): 861–880

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forrest B. (2011) The non-epistemology of intelligent design: The implications for public policy. Synthese 178(2): 331–379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gage L. P. (2010) Darwin, design and Thomas Aquinas: The mythical conflict between Thomism and intelligent design. Touchstone 23(6): 37–44

    Google Scholar 

  • George M. I. (2002) On attempts to salvage Paley’s argument from design. In: O’Callaghan John (eds) Science, philosophy, and theology. St. Augustine’s Press, South Bend, IN

    Google Scholar 

  • George R. P., Tollefsen C. (2008) Embryo: A defense of human life. Doubleday, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilson E. (2009) From Aristotle to Darwin and back again: A journey in final causality, species, and evolution. Originally published in English, 1984. Ignatius Press, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Haldane J., Lee P. (2003) Aquinas on human ensoulment, abortion and the value of life. Philosophy 78: 255–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • John Paul II. (1995). Evangelium vitae: The gospel of life: On the value and inviolability of human life. Washington, DC: U. S. Conference of Catholic Bishops.

  • Kaczor C. (2010) The ethics of abortion: Women’s rights, human life, and the question of justice. Routledge, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee P. (2004) The pro-life argument from substantial identity: A defense. Bioethics 18: 249–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee P. (2010) Abortion and unborn human life (2nd ed.). The Catholic University of America Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • McLaren A. (1982) The embryo. In: Austin C. R., Shorts R. V. (eds) Reproduction in mammals, book 2: Embryonic and fetal development. (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 1–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Machuga R. (2002) In defense of the soul. Brazos Press, Grand Rapids, MI

    Google Scholar 

  • Mere Creation. (1996). Mere creation: Reclaiming the book of nature conference on design and origins, 14–17 November 1996. Retrieved January 28, 2011, from http://www.origins.org/mc/menus/sched.html.

  • Moreland J. P. (2009) Consciousness and the existence of God. Routledge, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Mormonism and American Politics. (2007). Conference at Princeton University. Sponsored by Princeton’s Center for the Study or Religion, November 9–10, 2007. Retrieved February 1, 2011, from http://www.princeton.edu/~csrelig/mormonism&politics.

  • National Bioethics Advisory Commission: (1999) Ethical issues in human stem cell research: Report and recommendations of the national bioethics advisory commission. National Bioethics Advisory Commission, Rockville, MD

    Google Scholar 

  • National Institutes of Health. (2011). Stem cell basics. Retrieved January 31, 2011, from http://stemcells.nih.gov/info/basics/basics1.

  • Oderberg D. S. (2007) Real essentialism. Routledge, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • PhilPapers Surveys. (2009). Retrieved January 25, 2011, from http://philpapers.org/surveys/results.pl.

  • Pinker S. (2008) The stupidity of dignity. The New Republic 238(9): 28–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Plantinga A. (1993) Warrant and proper function. Oxford University Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rawls J. (1993) Political liberalism. Columbia University Press, Columbia

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryland M. (2009) Intelligent design theory. In: Fastiggi Robert L. (eds) New Catholic encyclopedia supplement 2009. Gale, Detroit, pp 470–478

    Google Scholar 

  • Sayre-McCord, G. (2009). Moral realism. Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Retrieved January 27, 2011, from http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/moral-realism/.

  • State Board of Education: (2004) Science framework for California public schools kindergarten through grade twelve. California Department of Education, Sacramento

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoljar, D. (2009). Physicalism. Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Retrieved February 5, 2011 from http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/physicalism/.

  • Tkacz M. W. (2007) Thomas Aquinas vs the intelligent designers: What is God’s finger doing in my pre-biotic soup?. In: Baird R. M., Rosenbaum S. E. (eds) Intelligent design: Science or religion?. Prometheus Books, Amherst, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Tooley M. (1983) Abortion and infanticide. New York, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Philosophy, Baylor University, One Bear Place #97273, Waco, TX, 76798-7273, USA

    Francis J. Beckwith

Authors
  1. Francis J. Beckwith
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Francis J. Beckwith.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Beckwith, F.J. Or we can be philosophers: a response to Barbara Forrest. Synthese 192 (Suppl 1), 3–25 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-011-9891-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-011-9891-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation