Abstract
This paper offers a novel way of reconstructing conceptual change in empirical theories. Changes occur in terms of the structure of the dimensions—that is to say, the conceptual spaces—underlying the conceptual framework within which a given theory is formulated. Five types of changes are identified: (1) addition or deletion of special laws, (2) change in scale or metric, (3) change in the importance of dimensions, (4) change in the separability of dimensions, and (5) addition or deletion of dimensions. Given this classification, the conceptual development of empirical theories becomes more gradual and rationalizable. Only the most extreme type—replacement of dimensions—comes close to a revolution. The five types are exemplified and applied in a case study on the development within physics from the original Newtonian mechanics to special relativity theory.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Andersen H., Barker P., Chen X. (2006) The cognitive structure of scientific revolutions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
Balzer W., Moulines C. U., Sneed J. D. (1987) An architectonic for science: The structuralist program. Reidel, Dordrecht
Balzer, W., Moulines, C. U., Sneed, J. D. (eds) (2000) Structuralist knowledge representation: Paradigmatic examples. Rodopi, Amsterdam
Balzer W., Pearce D. A., Schmidt H.-J. (1984) Reduction in science: Structure, examples, philosophical problems. Reidel, Dordrecht
Barker P. (2012) The cognitive structure of scientific revolutions. Erkenntnis 75(3): 445–465
Blaug M. (1975) Kuhn versus Lakatos, or paradigms versus research programmes in the history of economics. History of Political Economy 7(4): 399–433
Bridgman P. (1922) Dimensional analysis. Yale University Press, Yale
Chandler P. (1975) Clairaut’s critique of Newtonian attraction: Some insights into his philosophy of science. Annals of Science 32: 369–378
Chang H. (2004) Inventing temperature: Measurement and scientific progress. Oxford University Press, New York
Clarke B. (2002) From thermodynamics to virtuality. In: Clarke B., Hernderson L. D. (eds) From energy to information: Representation in science and technology, art and literature. Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA, pp 17–33
Coopersmith J. (2010) Energy, the subtle concept: The discovery of Feynman’s blocks from Leibniz to Einstein. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Coulson J. M., Richardson J. F., Backhurst J. R., Harker J. H. (2007) Chemical engineering. Elsevier, Burlington, MA
Czyz J. (1994) Paradoxes of measures and dimensions originating in Felix Hausdorffs’s ideas. World Scientific, River Edge, NJ
Falkenburg B. (2007) Particle metaphysics: A critical account of subatomic reality. Springer, Berlin
Fleck, L. (1935/1979). Genesis and development of a scientific fact. T. Trenn & R. Merton (Eds.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Gärdenfors P. (2000) Conceptual spaces: The geometry of thought. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
Gärdenfors P., Zenker F. (2011) Using conceptual spaces to model the dynamics of empirical theories. In: Olsson E. J., Enqvist S. (eds) Belief revision meets philosophy of science. Springer, Berlin, pp 137–153
Gähde U. (2002) Holism, underdetermination, and the dynamics of empirical theories. Synthese 130: 69–90
Harman P. M. (1982) Energy, force, and matter: The conceptual development of nineteenth-century physics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
Hausdorff F. (1903) Das Raumproblem. Annalen der Naturphilosophie 3: 1–23
Hickman F. R. (1984) Electrodynamical origins of Einstein’s theory of general relativity. International Journal of Theoretical Physics 23: 535–566
Hoyningen-Huene P. (1993) Reconstructing scientific revolutions: The philosophy of science of Thomas S. Kuhn. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Huntley H. E. (1952) Dimensional analysis. McDonald, London
Jammer M. (1957) Concepts of force: A study in the foundations of dynamics. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
Joule, J. P. (1849/1887). On the mechanical equivalent of heat. Reprinted in The Scientific Papers of James Prescott Joule (pp. 298–328). London: Dawsons of Pall Mall.
Krantz, D. H., Luce, R. D., Suppes, P., & Tversky, A. (1971, 1989, 1990). Foundations of measurement (Vol. I–III). New York: Academic Press.
Kuhn T. S. (1961) The function of measurement in modern physical science. Isis 52: 161–193
Kuhn, T. S. (1962/1970). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Kuhn T. S. (1976) Theory-change as structure-change: Comments on the Sneed formalism. Erkenntnis 10: 179–199
Kuhn T. S. (1977) The essential tension: Selected studies in scientific tradition and change. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Kuhn, T. S. (1987). What are scientific revolutions? In L. Krüger, L. Daston, & M. Heidelberger (Eds.), The probabilistic revolution (pp. 7–22). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Kuhn, T. S. (2000). The Road since Structure: Philosophical Essays, 1970–1993, with an Autobiographical Interview. In J. Conant & J. Haugeland (Eds.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Kyburg H. E. (1984) Theory and measurement. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
Lakatos I. (1978) The methodology of scientific research programs. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
Larvor B. (2003) Why did Kuhn’s Structure of Scientific Revolutions cause a fuss?. Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science 34: 369–390
Lindsay R. B. (1971) The concept of energy and its early historical development. Foundations of Physics 1: 383–393
Lorentz H. (1899) Simplified theory of electrical and optical phenomena in moving systems. Proceedings Academy of Science, Amsterdam I: 427–443
Losee J. (2004) Theories of scientific progress: An Introduction. Routledge, New York, NY
Maddox W. T. (1992) Perceptual and decisional separability. In: Ashby G. F. (eds) Multidimensional models of perception and cognition. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp 147–180
McMullin E. (2002) The origins of the field concept in physics. Physics in Perspective 4: 13–39
Melera R. D. (1992) The concept of perceptual similarity: From psychophysics to cognitive psychology. In: Algom D. (eds) Psychophysical approaches to cognition. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 303–388
Moulines C. U. (2002) Introduction: Structuralism as a program for modeling theoretical science. Synthese 130: 1–11
Navarro J. (2005) J. J. Thomson on the nature of matter: Corpuscles and the continuum. Centaurus 47: 259–282
Oberheim, E., & Hoyningen-Huene, P. (2009). The incommensurability of scientific theories. In E.N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2009/entries/incommensurability Accessed 24 December 2011.
Okun L. B. (1989) The concept of mass. Physics Today 42(6): 31–36
Palmer A. C. (2008) Dimensional analysis and intelligent experimentation. World Scientific Publishing, Hackensack, NJ
Poincaré H. (1897) Science and method (F. Maitland, Trans.). Thomas Nelson and Sons, London
Rayleigh L. (1915) The principle of similitude. Nature 95: 66–68
Rehg W. (2009) Cogent science in context: The science wars, argumentation theory and Habermas. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
Rivadulla A. (2004) The Newtonian limit of relativity theory and the rationality of theory change. Synthese 141: 417–429
Roche J. (1998) The mathematics of measurement: A critical history. The Athlone Press, London
Roseveare N. T. (1982) Mercury’s perihelion from LeVerrier to Einstein. Clarendon Press, Oxford
Schofield R. E. (1964) Joseph Priestley, the theory of oxidation and the nature of matter. Journal of the History of Ideas 25: 285–294
Sneed J. D. (1971) The logical structure of mathematical physics. Reidel, Dordrecht
Soler L., Sankey H., Hoyningen-Huene P. (2009) Rethinking scientific change and theory comparison: Stabilities, ruptures, incommensurabilities? (Boston studies in the philosophy of science, vol. 255). Springer, Berlin
Stegmüller W. (1976) The structuralist view of theories. Springer, Berlin
Stevens S. S. (1946) On the theory of scales of measurement. Science 103: 677–680
Sibum H. O. (1995) Reworking the mechanical value of heat: Instruments of precision and gestures of accuracy in early Victorian England. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 26: 73–106
Suppes P. (2002) Representation and invariance of scientific structures. CSLI Publications, Stanford, CA
Thomson J. J. (1881) On the electric and magnetic effects produced by the motion of electrified bodies. Philosophical Magazine 11: 229–249
Thomson J. J. (1897) Cathode rays. Philosophical Magazine 44: 293–316
Thomson J. J. (1899) On the masses of the ions in gases at low pressures. Philosophical Magazine 48: 547–567
Zenker F. (2009) Ceteris paribus in conservative belief revision. On the role of minimal change in rational theory development. Peter Lang, Berlin
Zenker, F. (forthcoming). From features via frames to spaces: Modeling scientific conceptual change without incommensurability or aprioricity. In T. Gamerschlag, D. Gerland, R. Osswald, & W. Petersen (Eds.), Proceedings of CTF09, Duesseldorf, June 2009.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gärdenfors, P., Zenker, F. Theory change as dimensional change: conceptual spaces applied to the dynamics of empirical theories. Synthese 190, 1039–1058 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-011-0060-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-011-0060-0