, Volume 187, Issue 2, pp 569–577

Ramsification and inductive inference


DOI: 10.1007/s11229-010-9861-9

Cite this article as:
Raatikainen, P. Synthese (2012) 187: 569. doi:10.1007/s11229-010-9861-9


An argument, different from the Newman objection, against the view that the cognitive content of a theory is exhausted by its Ramsey sentence is reviewed. The crux of the argument is that Ramsification may ruin inductive systematization between theory and observation. The argument also has some implications concerning the issue of underdetermination.


Ramsey sentences Structural realism Inductive systematization 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Philosophy, History, Culture and Art StudiesUniversity of HelsinkiUniversity of HelsinkiFinland

Personalised recommendations