Abstract
This paper provides an argument for a more socially relevant philosophy of science (SRPOS). Our aims in this paper are to characterize this body of work in philosophy of science, to argue for its importance, and to demonstrate that there are significant opportunities for philosophy of science to engage with and support this type of research. The impetus of this project was a keen sense of missed opportunities for philosophy of science to have a broader social impact. We illustrate various ways in which SRPOS can provide social benefits, as well as benefits to scientific practice and philosophy itself. Also, SRPOS is consistent with some historical and contemporary goals of philosophy of science. We’re calling for an expansion of philosophy of science to include more of this type of work. In order to support this expansion, we characterize philosophy of science as an epistemic community and examine the culture and practices of philosophy of science that can help or hinder research in this area.
Article PDF
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Acker J. (1990) Hierarchies, jobs, bodies: A theory of gendered organizations. Gender & Society 4(2): 139–158
Cartwright N., Cat J., Fleck L., Uebel T. (1996) Otto Neurath: Philosophy between science and politics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Fuller S. (2008) Science studies goes public: A report on an ongoing performance. Spontaneous Generations: A Journal for the History and Philosophy of Science 2(1): 11–21
Giere R. (2003) A new program for philosophy of science? Philosophy of Science 70: 15–21
Haslanger S. (2008) Changing the ideology and culture of philosophy: Not by reason (alone). Hypatia 23(2): 210–223
Hearn J., Parkin W. (1983) Gender and organizations: A selective review and a critique of a neglected area. Organization Studies 4(3): 219–242
Howard D. (2003) Two left turns make a right: On the curious political career of North American philosophy of science at midcentury. In: Richardson A., Hardcastle G. (eds) Logical empiricism in North America, Minnesota studies in the philosophy of science (Vol XVIII). University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, pp 25–93
Howard D. (2009) Better red than dead—Putting an end to the social irrelevance of postwar philosophy of science. Science and Education 18: 199–220
Kanter R. M. (1977) Men and women of the corporation. Basic Books, New York
Keller E. F. (1996) Feminism and science. In: Keller E. F., Longino H. E. (eds) Feminism and science. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 28–40
Kourany J. A. (2003a) A philosophy of science for the twenty-first century. Philosophy of Science 70: 1–14
Kourany J. A. (2003b) Reply to Giere. Philosophy of Science 70: 22–26
Kourany J. A. (2010) Philosophy of science after feminism. Oxford University Press, New York
Longino H. E. (1990) Science as social knowledge: Values and objectivity in scientific inquiry. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Longino H. E. (2002) The fate of knowledge. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fehr, C., Plaisance, K.S. Socially relevant philosophy of science: an introduction. Synthese 177, 301–316 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-010-9855-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-010-9855-7