Measuring voting power for dependent voters through causal models
We construct a new measure of voting power that yields reasonable measurements even if the individual votes are not cast independently. Our measure hinges on probabilities of counterfactuals, such as the probability that the outcome of a collective decision would have been yes, had a voter voted yes rather than no as she did in the real world. The probabilities of such counterfactuals are calculated on the basis of causal information, following the approach by Balke and Pearl. Opinion leaders whose votes have causal influence on other voters’ votes can have significantly more voting power under our measure. But the new measure of voting power is also sensitive to the voting rule. We show that our measure can be regarded as an average treatment effect, we provide examples in which it yields intuitively plausible results and we prove that it reduces to Banzhaf voting power in the limiting case of independent and equiprobable votes.
KeywordsVoting power Banzhaf measure Counterfactuals Causal models Average treatment effect
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Balke, A., & Pearl, J. (1994). Probabilistic evaluation of counterfactual queries. Proceedings of the Twelfth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, AAAII-94, 220–237.Google Scholar
- Beisbart, C. (2010). Groups can make a difference. Voting power measures extended. Theory and Decision, 69, 469–488; a former version is available in the Discussion Paper Series of the CPNSS at the LSE. http://www.lse.ac.uk/collections/CPNSS/CPNSS-DPS/LSEPhilosopyPapersList.htm.
- Dretske F. (1988) Explaining behaviour. MIT Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
- Felsenthal D. S., Machover M. (1998) The measurement of voting power: Theory and practice, problems and paradoxes. Edward Elgar, CheltenhamGoogle Scholar
- King G., Keohane R. O., Verba S. (1994) Designing social inquiry. Scientific inference in qualitative research. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJGoogle Scholar
- Lewis, D. (1979). Counterfactual dependence and time’s arrow. Noũs; also in Lewis, D. (1986). Philosophical papers (Vol. II, pp. 32–52). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Machover, M. (2007). Discussion topic: Voting power when voters’ independence is not assumed. Mimeo. http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/2966/.
- Morgan S. L., Winship C. (1999) Counterfactuals and causal inference. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- Morriss P. (1987). Power. A philosophical analysis (2nd ed., 2002). Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
- Perl J. (2000) Causality. Models, reasoning, and inference. Cambridge University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Spirtes P., Glymour C., Scheines R. (2000) Causation, prediction, and search, (2nd ed.). MIT Press, Boston, MAGoogle Scholar