Skip to main content
Log in

Experiment and theory building

Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Cite this article


I examine the role of inference from experiment in theory building. What are the options open to the scientific community when faced with an experimental result that appears to be in conflict with accepted theory? I distinguish, in Laudan’s (1977), Nickels’s (1981), and Franklin’s (1993) sense, between the context of pursuit and the context of justification of a scientific theory. Making this distinction allows for a productive middle position between epistemic realism and constructivism. The decision to pursue a new or a revised theory in response to the new evidence may not be fully rationally determined. Nonetheless, it is possible to distinguish the question of whether there is reason to pursue a theory from the question of whether that theory, once it has been pursued over time, solves a problem of interest to science. I argue that, in this context, there is a solid way to distinguish between the contexts of pursuit and of justification, on the basis of a theory’s evidential support and problem-solving ability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions


  • Collins H. (1994) A strong confirmation of the experimenter’s regress. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 25(3): 493–503

    Google Scholar 

  • Darrigol O. (2005) Worlds of flow: A history of hydrodynamics from the Bernoullis to Prandtl. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Eötvös R., Pekar D., Fekete E. (1922) Beiträge zum Gesetze der Proportionalität von Trägheit und Gravität. Annalen der Physik 68: 11–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischbach E., Sudarsky D., Szafer A., Talmadge C., Aronson S. (1986) Reanalysis of the Eötvös experiment. Physics Review Letters 56: 3–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franklin A. (1986) The neglect of experiment. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Franklin A. (1993) The rise and fall of the fifth force: Discovery, pursuit, and justification in modern physics. American Institute of Physics, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Franklin, A. (2009). Experiment in physics. The stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Spring 2009 Edition), Zalta, E. N. (Ed.), URL = <>.

  • Franklin-Hall L. (2005) Exploratory experiments. Philosophy of Science 72(5): 888–899

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuhs, A. E., Shetz, J. A. (eds) (1999) Fundamentals of fluid mechanics. John Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Galison P. (1987) How experiments end. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghigo, F. (2009). Karl Jansky and the discovery of cosmic radio waves. National Radio Astronomy Observatory,

  • Hacking I. (1983) Representing and intervening: Introductory topics in the philosophy of natural science. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Koenigsberger L. (1906) Hermann von Helmholtz, translated by Frances A. Welby with a preface by Lord Kelvin. Dover Publications, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn T. (1987) What are scientific revolutions ? In: Kruger L., Daston L., Heidelberger M. (eds) The probablistic revolution, Volume I: Ideas in history. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 7–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Laudan L. (1981) A confutation of convergent realism. Philosophy of Science 48(1): 19–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology. (July 31, 2009). Breakdown In Planck’s Law: Bringing Objects Close Together Can Boost Radiation Heat Transfer. Science Daily:

  • Mayo D. (1996) Error and the growth of experimental knowledge. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Nickles, T. (eds) (1980) Scientific discovery: Case studies. D. Reidel, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Nickles T. (1981) What is a problem that we may solve it ? Synthese 47: 85–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poincaré, H. (1890). Letter to Heinrich Hertz, 8 October 1890. ALS 4p. HS 02996, Archiv, Deutsches Museum.

  • Smith P. (1998) Approximate truth and dynamical theories. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 49(2): 253–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spanos A. (2009) The discovery of argon: A case for learning from data ? Philosophy of Science 77: 359–380

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lydia Patton.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Patton, L. Experiment and theory building. Synthese 184, 235–246 (2012).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: