Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The nature of information: a relevant approach

  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In “General Information in Relevant Logic” (Synthese 167, 2009), the semantics for relevant logic is interpreted in terms of objective information. Objective information is potential data that is available in an environment. This paper explores the notion of objective information further. The concept of availability in an environment is developed and used as a foundation for the semantics, in particular, as a basis for the understanding of the information that is expressed by relevant implication. It is also used to understand the nature of misinformation. A form of relevant logic—called “LOI” for “logic of objective information”—is presented and the relationship between the justification of its proof theory and the semantics is discussed. This relationship is rather reciprocal. Intuitive features of the logic are used to interpret and justify aspects of the model theory and intuitive aspects of the model theory are used to interpret and justify features of the logic. Information conditions are presented for the connectives and the way that they fit into the theory of information is discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson A., Belnap N. D. (1975) Entailment: Logic of relevance and necessity. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Barwise J. (1993) Constraints, channels, and the flow of information. In: Aczel P., Israel D., Katagiri Y., Peters S. (eds) Situation theory and its applications. CSLI, Stanford

    Google Scholar 

  • Barwise J., Perry J. (1983) Situations and attitudes. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Barwise J., Seligman J. (1997) Information flow: The logic of distributed systems. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Beall J. C., Brady R., Hazen A., Priest G., Restall G. (2006) Relevant restricted quantification. Journal of Philosophical Logic 35: 587–598

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beall J. C., Restall G. (2006) Logical pluralism. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Brady R. (2006) Normalized natural deduction systems for some relevant logics I: The logic DW. The Journal of Symbolic Logic 71: 35–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunn J. M. (1993) Star and perp. Philosophical Perspectives 7: 331–357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldblatt R., Hodkinson I. (2009) Commutativity of quantifiers in variable domain Kripke models. In: Makinson D., Malinowski J., Wansing H. (eds) Towards mathematical philosophy. Springer, Berlin, pp 9–30

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Israel D., Perry J. (1990) What is information?. In: Hanson P. (eds) Information, language, and cognition. University of British Columbia Press, Vancouver, pp 1–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahle R., Schroeder-Heister P. (2006) Introduction: Proof theoretic semantics. Synthese 148: 503–506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lemmon J. (1965) Beginning logic. Thomas Nelson and Sons, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Mares E. D. (1995) A star-free semantics for R. The Journal of Symbolic Logic 60: 579–590

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mares E. D. (2004) Relevant logic: A philosophical interpretation. Cambridge University Press, Cambrdge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mares E. D. (2009) General information in relevant logic. Synthese 167: 343–362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mares, E. D. (forthcoming). Conjunction and relevance. Journal of Logic and Computation.

  • Mares E. D., Goldblatt R. (2006) An alternative semantics for quantified relevant logic. The Journal of Symbolic Logic 71: 163–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orilia F. (2000) Argument deletion, thematic roles, and Leibniz’s logico-grammatical analysis of relations. History and Philosophy of Logic 21: 147–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prawitz D. (2006) Natural deduction: A proof-theoretic study. Dover, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Priest G. (1992) What is a non-normal world?. Logique et Analyse 139: 291–302

    Google Scholar 

  • Read S. (1988) Relevant logic: The philosophical interpretation of inference. Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Restall G. (1995) Information flow and relevant logics. In: Seligman J., Westerstahl D. (eds) Logic, language, and computation. CSLI, Stanford, pp 163–177

    Google Scholar 

  • Restall G. (2005) Logics, situations and channels. Journal of Cognitive Science 6: 125–150

    Google Scholar 

  • Routley R., Meyer R. K. (1972a) Semantics for entailment II. Journal of Philosophical Logic 1: 53–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Routley R., Meyer R. K. (1972b) Semantics for entailment III. Journal of Philosophical Logic 1: 192–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Routley R., Meyer R. K. (1973) Semantics for entailment. In: Leblanc H. (eds) Truth, syntax, and modality. North Holland, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Philosophy and Centre for Logic, Language and Computation, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand

    Edwin Mares

Authors
  1. Edwin Mares
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Edwin Mares.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mares, E. The nature of information: a relevant approach. Synthese 175 (Suppl 1), 111–132 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-010-9737-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-010-9737-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation