, Volume 182, Issue 2, pp 185–204 | Cite as

Foundations of an ontology of philosophy

  • Pierre Grenon
  • Barry SmithEmail author


We describe an ontology of philosophy that is designed to aid navigation through philosophical literature, including literature in the form of encyclopedia articles and textbooks and in both printed and digital forms. The ontology is designed also to serve integration and structuring of data pertaining to the philosophical literature, and in the long term also to support reasoning about the provenance and contents of such literature, by providing a representation of the philosophical domain that is oriented around what philosophical literature is about.


Ontology Philosophy 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Arp, R., & Smith, B. (2008). Function, role, and disposition in basic formal ontology. In Proceedings of bio-ontologies workshop (ISMB 2008) (pp. 45–48).
  2. Berman, B. L. (Ed.). (2001). Library of Congress subject headings in philosophy: A thesaurus. Philosophy Documentation Center.Google Scholar
  3. Broughton, K. M. (Ed.). (1998). The Philosopher’s Index thesaurus. Philosophy Documentation Center.Google Scholar
  4. Ceusters W., Smith B. (2007) Referent tracking for digital rights management. International Journal of Metadata, Semantics and Ontologies 2(1): 45–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Grenon P. (2008) A primer on knowledge representation and ontological engineering. In: Munn K., Smith B. (eds) Applied ontology. An introduction. Ontos, Frankfurt/Lancaster, pp 57–81Google Scholar
  6. Grenon P., Smith B. (2004) SNAP and SPAN: Towards dynamic spatial ontology. Spatial Cognition and Computation 4(1): 69–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Holenstein E. (2004) Philosophie-Altas: Orte und Wege des Denkens. Ammann Verlag, ZurichGoogle Scholar
  8. Mulligan K. (1997) Sur l’histoire de l’approche analytique de l’histoire de la philosophie: de Bolzano et Brentano à Bennett et Barnes. In: Vienne J.-M. (eds) Philosophie analytique et histoire de la philosophie. Vrin, Paris, pp 61–103Google Scholar
  9. Mulligan K. (2001) De la philosophie autrichienne et de sa place. In: Cometti J.-P., Mulligan K. (eds) La Philosophie autrichienne de Bolzano à Musil. Vrin, Paris, pp 8–25Google Scholar
  10. Philosophy Family Tree. Last accessed July 14, (2008).
  11. Rubin D. L., Shah N. H., Noy N. F. (2008) Biomedical ontologies: A functional review. Briefings in Bioinformatics 9: 75–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Simons P. (2004) The Anglo–Austrian analytic axis. In: Simons P. (eds) Philosophy and logic in Central Europe from Bolzano to Tarski: Selected essays. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 143–158Google Scholar
  13. Smith B. (2003) Ontology. In: Floridi L. (eds) Blackwell guide to the philosophy of computing and information. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 155–166Google Scholar
  14. Smith B. (2004) Beyond concepts, or: Ontology as reality representation. In: Varzi A., Vieu L. (eds) Formal ontology and information systems. Proceedings of the Third International Conference (FOIS 2004). IOS Press, Amsterdam, pp 73–84Google Scholar
  15. Smith B. (2005) Against fantology. In: Marek J. C., Reicher M. E. (eds) Experience and analysis. HPT&ÖBV, Vienna, pp 153–170Google Scholar
  16. Smith B. (2008) Ontology (Science). In: Eschenbach C., Gruninger M. (eds) Formal ontology in information systems. Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference (FOIS 2008). IOS Press, Amsterdam, pp 21–35Google Scholar
  17. Smith B., Ashburner M., Rosse C., Bard J., Bug W., Ceusters W. et al (2007) The OBO foundry: Coordinated evolution of ontologies to support biomedical data integration. Nature Biotechnology 25(11): 1251–1255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Smith B., Ceusters W., Klagges B., Khler J., Kumar A., Lomax J. et al (2005) Relations in biomedical ontologies. Genome Biology 6(5): R46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Smith B., Grenon P. (2004) The cornucopia of formal-ontological relations. Dialectica 58(3): 279–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Trautwein M., Grenon P. (2003) Roles: One dead armadillo on Wordnet’s speedway to ontology. In: Sojka P., Pala K., Smrž P., Fellbaum C., Vossen P. (eds) Proceedings of the Second International Wordnet Conference (GWC 2004). Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic, pp 314–346Google Scholar
  21. Watson Semantic Web Search Engine. Last accessed July 16, (2008).

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyUniversity of GenevaGenevaSwitzerland
  2. 2.Department of PhilosophySUNY at BuffaloBuffaloUSA

Personalised recommendations