Skip to main content
Log in

Is structural underdetermination possible?

  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript


Structural realism is sometimes said to undermine the theory underdetermination (TUD) argument against realism, since, in usual TUD scenarios, the supposed underdetermination concerns the object-like theoretical content but not the structural content. The paper explores the possibility of structural TUD by considering some special cases from modern physics, but also questions the validity of the TUD argument itself. The upshot is that cases of structural TUD cannot be excluded, but that TUD is perhaps not such a terribly serious anti-realistic argument.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others


  • Earman J. (1993) Underdetermination, realism, and reason. Midwest Studies in Philosophy 18: 19–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Esfeld M. (2004) Quantum entanglement and a metaphysics of relations. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 35(4): 601–617

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • French S. (2006) Structure as a weapon of the realist. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 106: 167–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glymour, C. (1977). Indistinguishable Space-Times and the Fundamental Group. In J. Earman, C. Glymour, & J. Stachel (Eds.), Foundations of space-time theories (Vol. 8), Minnesota studies in the philosophy of science. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

  • Hayashi K., Shirafuji T. (1979) New general relativity. Physical Review D 19(12): 3524–3553

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoefer C., Rosenberg A. (1994) Empirical equivalence, underdetermination, and systems of the world. Philosophy of Science 61: 592–607

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laudan L., Leplin J. (1991) Empirical equivalence and underdetermination. Journal of Philosophy 88: 449–472

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ladyman, J., & Ross, D. (with D. Spurrett and J. Collier) (2007). Every thing must go: Metaphysics naturalised. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Lyre H., Eynck T. O. (2003) Curve it, gauge it, or leave it? underdetermination in gravitational theories. Journal for General Philosophy of Science 34(2): 277–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyre H. (2004a) Lokale Symmetrien und Wirklichkeit. Mentis, Paderborn

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyre H. (2004b) Holism and structuralism in U(1) gauge theory. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 35(4): 643–670

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyre, H. (2009). Structural realism and abductive-transcendental arguments. InM. Bitbol, P. Kerszberg, & J. Petitot, Constituting objectivity. Transcendental perspectives on modern physics. Berlin: Springer.

  • Malament, D. (1977). Observationally indistinguishable space-times. In J. Earman, C. Glymour, & J. Stachel (Eds.), Foundations of space-time theories (Vol. 8), Minnesota studies in the philosophy of science. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

  • Nester J.M. (1988) Is there really a problem with the teleparallel theory?. Classical and Quantum Gravity 5: 1003–1010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quine W. V. (1975) On empirically equivalent systems of the world. Erkenntnis 9: 313–328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quine W. V. (1990) Three indeterminacies. In: Barrett R. B., Gibson R. F. (eds) Perspectives on quine. Blackwell, Oxford, p.13

    Google Scholar 

  • Redhead M. (2002) The interpretation of gauge symmetry. In: Kuhlmann M., Lyre H., Wayne A. (eds) Ontological aspects of quantum field theory. World Scientific, Singapore, pp 281–301

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Scheibe, E. (1994). On the mathematical overdetermination of physics. In E. Rudolph, I.-O. Stamatescu (Eds.), Philosophy, mathematics and modern physics (pp. 186–199). Berlin: Springer. (Reprinted from Between rationalism and empiricism: Selected papers in the philosophy of physics, No. VIII.38 by E. Scheibe, Ed., 2001, Berlin: Springer.

  • Shapiro S. (2000) Thinking about Mathematics. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • van Fraassen B. C. (1980) The scientific image. Clarendon Press, Oxford, p. 46

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Holger Lyre.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lyre, H. Is structural underdetermination possible?. Synthese 180, 235–247 (2011).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: