Abstract
This paper argues that a successful philosophical analysis of models and simulations must accommodate an account of mathematically rigorous results. Such rigorous results may be thought of as genuinely model-specific contributions, which can neither be deduced from fundamental theory nor inferred from empirical data. Rigorous results provide new indirect ways of assessing the success of models and simulations and are crucial to understanding the connections between different models. This is most obvious in cases where rigorous results map different models on to one another. Not only does this put constraints on the extent to which performance in specific empirical contexts may be regarded as the main touchstone of success in scientific modelling, it also allows for the transfer of warrant across different models. Mathematically rigorous results can thus come to be seen as not only strengthening the cohesion between scientific strategies of modelling and simulation, but also as offering new ways of indirect confirmation.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bailer-Jones D.M. (2003) When scientific models represent. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 17: 59–74
Batterman R.W. (2001) The devil in the details. Asymptotic reasoning in explanation, reduction and emergence. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Batterman R.W. (2002) Asymptotics and the role of minimal models. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 53: 21–38
Baxter R.J. (1982) Exactly solved models in statistical mechanics. Academic Press, New York
Boumans M. (1999) Built-in justification. In: Morrison M., Morgan M.S. (eds) Models as mediators. Perspectives on natural and social science. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 68–96
Cartwright N. (1999) The dappled world. A study of the boundaries of science. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Dietrich F., Moretti L. (2005) On coherent sets and the transmission of confirmation. Philosophy of Science 72: 403–424
de Boer J.H., Verwey E.J.W. (1937) Semi-conductors with partially and with completely filled 3d-lattice bands. Proceedings of the Physical Society (Extra Part) 49: 59–71
Domb C. (1996) The critical point. A historical introduction to the modern theory of critical phenomena. Taylor and Francis, London
Eells E., Fitelson B. (2000) Measuring confirmation and evidence. The Journal of Philosophy 97: 663–672
Ejima S., Gebhard F., Nishimoto S. (2005) Tomonaga–Luttinger parameters for doped Mott insulators. Europhysics Letters 70: 492–498
Fermi E. (1935) Sulla quantizzazione del gas perfetto monoatomico. Rendiconti della Accademia Nazionale dei Lincei 6: 145–149
Fitelson B. (2003) A probabilistic theory of coherence. Analysis 63: 194–199
Gebhard, F. (1997). The Mott metal–insulator transition: Models and methods. Springer tracts in modern physics (Vol. 137). Berlin: Springer.
Gelfert A. (2005) Mathematical rigor in physics: Putting exact results in their place. Philosophy of Science 72: 723–738
Giere R.N. (1999) Using models to represent reality. In: Magnani L., Nersessian N.J., Thagard P. (eds) Model-based reasoning in scientific discovery. Plenum Publishers, New York, pp 41–57
Griffiths R.B. (1972) Rigorous results and theorems. In: Domb C., Green M.S. (eds) Phase transitions and critical phenomena. Academic Press, New York, pp 8–109
Heidelberger M. (2006) Applying models in fluid dynamics. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 20: 49–67
Hubbard J. (1963) Electron correlations in narrow energy bands. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical and Physical Sciences 276: 238–257
Hughes R.I.G. (1999) The Ising model, computer simulation, and universal physics. In: Morrison M., Morgan M.S. (eds) Models as mediators. Perspectives on natural and social science. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 97–145
Humphreys P. (2004) Extending ourselves. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Laudan L., Leplin J. (1991) Empirical equivalence and underdetermination. The Journal of Philosophy 88: 449–472
Moretti L. (2007) Ways in which coherence is confirmation conducive. Synthese 157: 309–319
Morrison M.C. (1998) Modelling nature: Between physics and the physical world. Philosophia Naturalis 35: 65–85
Morrison M. (1999) Models as autonomous agents. In: Morrison M., Morgan M.S. (eds) Models as mediators. Perspectives on natural and social science. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 36–65
Morrison M., Morgan M.S. (1999) Models as mediating instruments. In: Morrison M., Morgan M.S. (eds) Models as mediators. Perspectives on natural and social science. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 10–37
Mott N. (1937) Discussion of the paper by De Boer and Verwey. Proceedings of the Physical Society (Extra Part) 49: 72–73
Nolting, W. (2000). Ferromagnetism and electronic correlations. In F. Mancini (Ed.), Lectures on the physics of highly correlated electron systems. AIP Conference Proceedings (Vol. 527, pp. 118–225). Melville: American Institute of Physics Publishing.
Okasha S. (1997) Laudan and Leplin on empirical equivalence. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 48: 251–256
Olsson E.J. (2005) Against coherence: Truth, probability, and justification. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Shogenji T. (2001) The role of coherence in epistemic justification. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 79: 90–106
Steiner M. (1989) The application of mathematics to natural science. The Journal of Philosophy 86(9): 449–480
Steiner M., Villain J., Windsor C.G. (1976) Theoretical and experimental studies on one-dimensional magnetic systems. Advances in Physics 25: 87–209
Suárez M. (1999) Theories, models, and representations. In: Magnani L., Nersessian N.J., Thagard P. (eds) Model-based reasoning in scientific discovery. Plenum Publishers, New York, pp 75–83
Toschi A., Barone P., Capone M., Castellani C. (2005) Pairing and superconductivity from weak to strong coupling in the attractive Hubbard model. New Journal of Physics 7(7): 1–17
Tusch M.A., Szczech Y.H., Logan D.E. (1996) Magnetism in the Hubbard model: An effective spin Hamiltonian approach. Physical Review B 53(9): 5505–5517
Wilson A.H. (1931) The theory of electronic semiconductors. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical and Physical Sciences 133: 458–491
Winsberg E. (1999) Sanctioning models: The epistemology of simulation. Science in Context 12: 275–292
Winsberg E. (2003) Simulated experiments: Methodology for a virtual world. Philosophy of Science 70: 105–125
Yi S.W. (2002) The nature of model-based understanding in condensed matter physics. Mind and Society 3: 81–91
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gelfert, A. Rigorous results, cross-model justification, and the transfer of empirical warrant: the case of many-body models in physics. Synthese 169, 497–519 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-008-9431-6
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-008-9431-6