Skip to main content
Log in

The interactivist model

Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A shift from a metaphysical framework of substance to one of process enables an integrated account of the emergence of normative phenomena. I show how substance assumptions block genuine ontological emergence, especially the emergence of normativity, and how a process framework permits a thermodynamic-based account of normative emergence. The focus is on two foundational forms of normativity, that of normative function and of representation as emergent in a particular kind of function. This process model of representation, called interactivism, compels changes in many related domains. The discussion ends with brief attention to three domains in which changes are induced by the representational model: perception, learning, and language.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aitchison I.J.R. (1985). Nothing’s plenty: The vacuum in modern quantum field theory. Contemporary Physics 26(4): 333–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aitchison I.J.R. and Hey A.J.G. (1989). Gauge theories in particle physics. Adam Hilger, Bristol, England

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, J. (2007). Stepping off the pendulum: Why only a thoroughly action based approach can fully transcend the nativist-empiricist epicycles and ground mind in the natural world. Interactivist Summer Institute, The American University of Paris, May 29, 2007.

  • Belsey A. (1995). Matter. In: Honderich, T. (eds) The Oxford companion to philosophy, p. 539. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Bickhard M.H. (1980). Cognition, convention and communication. Praeger Publishers, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Bickhard M.H. (1987). The social nature of the functional nature of language. In: Hickmann, M. (eds) Social and functional approaches to language and thought, pp 39–65. Academic, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Bickhard M.H. (1993). Representational content in humans and machines. Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence 5: 285–333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bickhard M.H. (1995). Intrinsic constraints on language: Grammar and hermeneutics. Journal of Pragmatics 23: 541–554

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bickhard, M. H. (2000a). Information and representation in autonomous agents. Journal of Cognitive Systems Research, 1, 65–75. http://www.elsevier.nl.

  • Bickhard M.H. (2000b). Motivation and emotion: An interactive process model. In: Ellis R.D., Newton N. (eds). The Caldron of Consciousness. J. Benjamins, pp. 161–178

  • Bickhard M.H. (2000c). Emergence. In: Andersen, P.B., Emmeche, C., Finnemann, N.O. and Christiansen, P.V. (eds) Downward causation, pp 322–348. University of Aarhus Press, Aarhus, Denmark

    Google Scholar 

  • Bickhard M.H. (2002). Critical principles: On the negative side of rationality. New Ideas in Psychology 20: 1–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bickhard M.H. (2003a). Some notes on internal and external relations and representation. Consciousness & Emotion 4(1): 101–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bickhard M.H. (2003b). An integration of motivation and cognition. In: Smith, L., Rogers, C. and Tomlinson, P. (eds) Development and motivation: Joint perspectives, pp 41–56. British Psychological Society, Monograph Series II, Leicester

    Google Scholar 

  • Bickhard M.H. (2003c). Variations in variation and selection: The ubiquity of the variation-and-selective retention ratchet in emergent organizational complexity, Part II: Quantum field theory. Foundations of Science 8(3): 283–293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bickhard, M. H. (2004a). Process and emergence: Normative function and representation. Axiomathes–An International Journal in Ontology and Cognitive Systems, 14, 135–169. Reprinted from: Bickhard, M. H. (2003). Process and emergence: Normative function and representation. In J. Seibt (Ed.), Process theories: Cross disciplinary studies in dynamic categories (pp. 121–155). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.

  • Bickhard M.H. (2004b). The social ontology of persons. In: Carpendale, J.I.M. and Muller, U. (eds) Social interaction and the development of knowledge, pp 111–132. Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Bickhard M.H. (2005). Consciousness and reflective consciousness. Philosophical Psychology 18(2): 205–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bickhard M.H. (2006). Developmental normativity and normative development. In: Smith, L. and Voneche, J. (eds) Norms in human development, pp 57–76. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Bickhard M.H. (2007). Language as an interaction system. New Ideas in Psychology 25(2): 171–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bickhard, M. H. (forthcoming-a). Interactivism. In P. Calvo & J. Symons (Eds.), Routledge companion to the philosophy of psychology. London: Routledge.

  • Bickhard, M. H. (forthcoming-b). Interactive knowing: The metaphysics of intentionality. In R. Poli, J. Seibt, & J. Symons (Eds.), Theory and applications of ontology. Dordrecht: Kluwer

  • Bickhard, M. H. (forthcoming-c). Social ontology as convention. Topoi.

  • Bickhard, M. H. (in preparation). The whole person: Toward a naturalism of persons—contributions to an ontological psychology.

  • Bickhard M.H. and Campbell R.L. (1992). Some foundational questions concerning language studies: With a focus on categorial grammars and model theoretic possible worlds semantics. Journal of Pragmatics 17(5/6): 401–433

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bickhard M.H. and Campbell R.L. (1996). Topologies of learning and development. New Ideas in Psychology 14(2): 111–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bickhard M.H. and Richie D.M. (1983). On the nature of representation: A case study of James Gibson’s theory of perception. Praeger Publishers, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Bickhard, M. H., & Terveen, L. (1995). Foundational issues in artificial intelligence and cognitive science: Impasse and solution. Elsevier Scientific.

  • Brown H.R. and Harré R. (1988). Philosophical foundations of quantum field theory. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Butchvarov P. (1999). Substance. In: Audi, R. (eds) The Cambridge dictionary or philosophy, p. 887. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell D.T. (1974). Evolutionary Epistemology. In: Schilpp, P.A. (eds) The philosophy of Karl Popper, pp 413–463. Open Court, LaSalle, IL

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell D.T. (1990). Levels of organization, downward causation and the selection-theory approach to evolutionary epistemology. In: Greenberg, G. and Tobach, E. (eds) Theories of the evolution of knowing, pp 1–17. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, R. J. (1992). Truth and historicity. Oxford.

  • Campbell, R. J., & Bickhard, M. H. (in preparation). Physicalism, emergence, and downward causation.

  • Campbell R.L. and Bickhard M.H. (1986). Knowing levels and developmental stages. Contributions to Human Development. Karger, Basel, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  • Cao T.Y. (1999). Conceptual foundations of quantum field theory. Cambridge, Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlson N.R. (2000). Physiology of behavior (7th ed). Allyn and Bacon, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, C. C., & Keisler, H. J. (1990). Model theory. North Holland.

  • Chapman M. (1988). Constructive evolution: Origins and development of Piaget’s thought. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen W.D. and Bickhard M.H. (2002). The process dynamics of normative function. Monist 85(1): 3–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Christopher J.C. and Bickhard M.H. (2007). Culture, self and identity: Interactivist contributions to a metatheory for cultural psychology. Culture & Psychology 13(3): 259–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clifton, R. (1996). Perspectives on quantum reality. Kluwer Academic.

  • Cummins R. (1996). Representations, targets and attitudes. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies P.C.W. (1984). Particles do not exist. In: Christensen, S.M. (eds) Quantum theory of gravity, pp 66–77. Bristol England, Adam, Hilger

    Google Scholar 

  • Diessel H. (2007). Frequency effects in language acquisition, language use and diachronic change. New Ideas in Psychology 25(2): 108–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doyle J. (1985). Circumscription and implicit definability. Journal of Automated Reasoning 1: 391–405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dretske F.I. (1988). Explaining behavior. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Fauconnier G. (1985). Mental spaces. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Fodor J.A. (1981). The present status of the innateness controversy. In: Fodor, J. (eds) Representations, pp 257–316. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Fodor J.A. (1987). A situated grandmother?. Mind and Language 2: 64–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fodor J.A. (1990a). A theory of content and other essays. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Fodor J.A. (1990b). Information and representation. In: Hanson, P.P. (eds) Information, language and cognition, pp 175–190. University of British Columbia Press, Vancouver

    Google Scholar 

  • Fodor J.A. (1991). Replies. In: In; Loewer, B. and Rey, G. (eds) Meaninig in mind: Fodor and his critics, pp 255–319. Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Fodor, J. A. (1998). Concepts: Where cognitive science went wrong. Oxford.

  • Fodor, J. A. (2003). Hume variations. Oxford.

  • Fodor J.A. and Pylyshyn Z. (1981). How direct is visual perception?: Some reflections on Gibson’s ecological approach. Cognition 9: 139–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson J.J. (1966). The senses considered as perceptual systems. Houghton Mifflin, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson J.J. (1977). The theory of affordances. In: Shaw, R. and Bransford, J. (eds) Perceiving, acting and knowing., pp 67–82. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson J.J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Houghton Mifflin, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson R.F. (2004). Quine’s behaviorism cum empiricism. In: Gibson, R.F. (eds) The Cambridge companion to quine, pp 181–199. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gill, M-L. (1989). Aristotle on substance. Princeton.

  • Glock H.-J. (1996). Necessity and normativity. In: Sluga, H. and Stern, D.G. (eds) The Cambridge companion to wittgenstein, pp 198–225. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Glock, H.-J. (2003). Quine and Davidson on language, thought, and reality. Cambridge.

  • Goldberg A.E., Casenhiser D. and White T.R. (2007). Constructions as categories of language. New Ideas in Psychology 25(2): 70–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham, D. W. (1997). Heraclitus’ criticism of ionian philosophy. In C. C. W. Taylor (Ed.), Oxford studies in ancient philosophy (Vol. XV, pp. 1–50). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Graham D.W. (2006). Explaining the cosmos. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenspan S. and Shanker S. (2007). The developmental pathways leading to pattern recognition, joint attention, language and cognition. New Ideas in Psychology 25(2): 128–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guthrie W.K.C. (1965). A history of greek philosophy II: The presocratic tradition from parmenides to democritus. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Hale B. and Wright C. (2000). Implicit definition and the a priori. In: Boghossian, P. and Peacocke, C. (eds) New essays on the a priori, pp 286–319. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Halvorson H. and Clifton R. (2002). No place for particles in relativistic quantum theories?. Philosophy of Science 69(1): 1–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins J.A. (2007). Processing typology and why psychologists need to know about it. New Ideas in Psychology 25(2): 87–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hilbert D. (1971). The foundations of geometry. Open Court, La Salle

    Google Scholar 

  • Huggett N. (2000). Philosophical foundations of quantum field theory. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 51(supplement): 617–637

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huggett N. and Weingard R. (1996). Critical review: Paul Teller’s interpretive introduction to quantum field theory. Philosophy of Science 63: 302–314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hume D. (1978). A treatise of human nature. Index by L. A. Selby-Bigge; Notes by P. H. Nidditch. Oxford.

  • Hylton P. (1990). Russell, idealism and the emergence of analytic philosophy. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Joas H. (1993). American pragmatism and German thought: A history of misunderstandings. In: Joas, H. (eds) Pragmatism and social theory, pp 94–121. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan D. (1979). On the logic of demonstratives. In: P. French, T. Uehling, Jr., H. Wettstein (eds) Contemporary perspectives in the philosophy of language, pp 401–412. Minnesota University Press, Minneapolis

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan D. (1989). Demonstratives: An essay on semantics, logic, metaphysics, and epistemology of demonstratives and other indexicals. In: Allmog J., Perry J., Wettstein H. (eds) Themes from Kaplan. Oxford University Press, pp. 481–563

  • Kim J. (1991). Epiphenomenal and supervenient causation. In D. M. Rosenthal (Ed.), The nature of mind (pp. 257–265). Oxford University Press.

  • Kim J. (1993). Supervenience and mind. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, J. (1998). Mind in a physical world. MIT.

  • Kim J. (2005). Physicalism, or something near enough. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Kneale W. and Kneale M. (1986). The development of logic. Clarendon, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolaitis, Ph. G. (1990). Implicit definability on finite structures and unambiguous computations. In Proc. 5th IEEE LICS (pp. 168–180).

  • Kuhlmann M., Lyre H. and Wayne A. (2002). Ontological aspects of quantum field theory. World Scientific, River Edge, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Levine A. and Bickhard M.H. (1999). Concepts: Where fodor went wrong. Philosophical Psychology 12(1): 5–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis D.K. (1969). Convention. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • McLaughlin B.P. (1992). The rise and fall of British emergentism. In: Beckermann, A., Flohr, H. and Kim, J. (eds) Emergence or reduction? Essays on the prospects of nonreductive physicalism, pp 49–93. Walter de Gruyter, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • McLaughlin, B. P., & Bennett, K. (2005). Supervenience. Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/supervenience/.

  • Millikan R.G. (1984). Language, thought and other biological categories. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Millikan R.G. (1993). White queen psychology and other essays for alice. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunberg G. (1979). The non-uniqueness of semantic solutions. Linguistics and Philosophy 3(2): 143–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Regan J.K. and Noë A. (2001). A sensorimotor account of vision and visual consciousness. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24(5): 939–1011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orenstein, A. (2002). W. V. Quine. Princeton.

  • Otero M.H. (1970). Gergonne on implicit definition. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 30(4): 596–599

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Owens J. (1978). The Doctrine of being in the Aristotelian metaphysics (3rd ed). Pontifical Institute of Medieval Studies, Toronto

    Google Scholar 

  • Partee B. (1972). Opacity, coreference and pronouns. In: Davidson, D. and Harman, G. (eds) Semantics of natural language, pp 415–441. Reidel, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry, J. (1993). The problem of the essential indexical. Oxford.

  • Piaget J. (1954). The construction of reality in the child. Basic, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget J. (1970). Genetic epistemology. Columbia, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. (2001). Studies in reflecting abstraction. (Ed. and transl. by Robert L. Campbell). Hove, England: Psychology Press.

  • Piattelli-Palmarini M. (1980). Language and learning. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Popkin R. (2003). The history of scepticism. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Popkin R.H. and Stroll A. (2002). Skeptical philosophy for everyone. Prometheus Books, Amherst, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Port R. (2007). How are words stored in memory? Beyond phones and phonemes. New Ideas in Psychology 25(2): 143–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quine W.V.O. (1966). Implicit definition sustained. In: Quine, W.V.O. (eds) The ways of paradox, pp 195–198. Random House, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Reale G. (1987). From the origins to socrates. State University of New York Press, Albany

    Google Scholar 

  • Rescher N. (1980). Scepticism. Rowman and Littlefield, Totowa, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, H. (2004). Substance. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/substance/.

  • Ryder, L. H. (1985). Quantum field theory. Cambridge.

  • Schelling T.C. (1963). The strategy of conflict. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Schurz, G. (1997). The is-ought problem: An investigation in philosophical logic (Trends in Logic, V. 1). Kluwer Academic.

  • Sciama D.W. (1991). The physical significance of the vacuum state of a quantum field. In: Saunders, S. and Brown, H.R. (eds) The philosophy of vacuum, pp 137–158. Clarendon, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, S. (1991). Foundations without foundationalism. Oxford.

  • Shapiro, S. (1997). Philosophy of mathematics: Structure and ontology. Oxford.

  • Shapiro S. (2005a). Higher order logic. In: Shapiro, S. (eds) The Oxford handbook of philosophy of mathematics and logic, pp 751–780. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro S. (2005b). The Oxford handbook of philosophy of mathematics and logic. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, B. C. (1987). The correspondence continuum. Stanford, CA: Center for the Study of Language and Information, CSLI-87-71.

  • Taylor, C. C. W. (1997). Anaxagoras and the atomists. In C. C. W. Taylor (Ed.), From the beginning to Plato (pp. 208–243). Routledge.

  • Teller P. (1992). A contemporary look at emergence. In: Beckermann, A., Flohr, H. and Kim, J. (eds) Emergence or reduction? essays on the prospects of nonreductive physicalism, pp 139–153. Walter de Gruyter, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Teller P. (1996). Wave and particle concepts in quantum field theory. In: Clifton, R. (eds) Perspectives on quantum reality, pp 143–154. Kluwer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Trusted J. (1999). The mystery of matter. St. Martin’s Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinberg S. (1977). The search for unity, notes for a history of quantum field theory. Daedalus 106(4): 17–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinberg S. (1995). The quantum theory of fields. Foundations (Vol 1). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Weintraub R. (1997). The sceptical challenge. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein Ludwig (1953). Philosophical investigations. Cambridge, Basil Blackwell

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, M. R. (1997). Empedocles. In C. C. W. Taylor (Ed.), From the beginning to Plato (pp. 175–207). Routledge.

  • Zee A. (2003). Quantum field theory in a nutshell. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mark H. Bickhard.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bickhard, M.H. The interactivist model. Synthese 166, 547–591 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-008-9375-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-008-9375-x

Keywords

Navigation