Abstract
General Process Theory (GPT) is a new (non-Whiteheadian) process ontology. According to GPT the domains of scientific inquiry and everyday practice consist of configurations of ‘goings-on’ or ‘dynamics’ that can be technically defined as concrete, dynamic, non-particular individuals called general processes. The paper offers a brief introduction to GPT in order to provide ontological foundations for research programs such as interactivism that centrally rely on the notions of ‘process,’ ‘interaction,’ and ‘emergence.’ I begin with an analysis of our common sense concept of activities, which plays a crucial heuristic role in the development of the notion of a general process. General processes are not individuated in terms of their location but in terms of ‘what they do,’ i.e., in terms of their dynamic relationships in the basic sense of one process being part of another. The formal framework of GPT is thus an extensional mereology, albeit a non-classical theory with a non-transitive part-relation. After a brief sketch of basic notions and strategies of the GPT-framework I show how the latter may be applied to distinguish between causal, mechanistic, functional, self-maintaining, and recursively self-maintaining interactions, all of which involve ‘emergent phenomena’ in various senses of the term.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baas, N. (1992). Emergence, hierarchies, and hyperstructures. Paper presented at the Third Annual Artificial Life Conference, Santa Fe.
Bickhard M. (2003) Process and emergence: Normative function and representation. In: Seibt J. (eds) Processes: Analysis and applications of dynamic categories. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 121–155
Christensen W., Bickhard M. (2002) The process dynamics of normative function. The Monist 85: 3–28
Cunningham B. (2001) The reemergence of ‘emergence’. Philosophy of Science 68: S62–S75
Dowe P. (1992) Wesley Salmon’s process theory of causality and the conserved quantity theory. Philosophy of Science 59: 195–216
Emmeche C., Køppe S., Stjernfelt F. et al (2000) Levels, emergence, and three versions of downward causation. In: Emmeche C. (eds) Downward causation. Aarhus University Press, Aarhus, pp 8–24
Hooker C.A. (2004) Asymptotics, reduction and emergence. British Journal for Philosophy of Science 55: 435–479
Humphreys P. (1997) How properties emerge. Philosophy of Science 64: 1–17
Kim J. (1993) Supervenience and mind: Selected philosophical essays. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Machamer P., Darden L., Craver C. (2000) Thinking about mechanisms. Philosophy of Science 67: 1–25
Mourelatos A. (1978) Events, processes, and states. Linguistics and Philosophy 2: 415–434
Mourelatos A. (1986) Quality, structure and emergence in later pre-socratic philosophy. In: Cleary J. (eds) Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy. Lanham, NY, pp 127–194
Newman D. (1996) Emergence and strange attractrors. Philosophy of Science 63: 245–261
Puntel L.B. (1993) The context principle, universals and primary states of affairs. American Philosophical Quarterly 30: 123–135
Puntel L.B. (2006) Struktur und Sein. Tübingen, Mohr-Siebeck
Quine W.V.O. (1985) Events and reification. In: LePore E., McLaughlin B. (eds) Actions and events. Blackwell, Perspectives on the philosophy of D. Davidson. Oxford, pp 162–172
Rescher N. (1996) Process metaphysics. An introduction. SUNY-Press, Albany
Rueger A. (2000) Robust supervenience and emergence. Philosophy of Science 67: 466–489
Salmon W. (1997) Causality and explanation: A reply to two critiques. Philosophy of Science 64: 461–477
Saywer K. (2004) The mechanisms of emergence. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 34: 260–282
Schroeder T. (2004) Functions from regulation. The Monist 87: 115–137
Seibt, J. (1990). Towards process ontology: A critical study in substance-ontological premises. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Pittsburgh, UMI-Publications.
Seibt J. (1995) Individuen als Prozesse: Zur prozeß-ontologischen Revision des Substanzparadigmas. Logos 2: 303–343
Seibt J. (1996) The myth of substance and the fallacy of misplaced concreteness. Acta Analytica 15: 61–76
Seibt J. (1996) Non-countable individuals: Why ‘one’ and the ‘same’ is not one and the same. Southwest Philosophy Review 12: 225–237
Seibt J. (1997) Existence in time: From substance to process. In: Faye J., Scheffler U., Urs M. (eds) Perspectives on time. Kluwer, Boston studies in philosophy of science. Dordrecht, pp 143–182
Seibt, J. (2000a). The dynamic constitution of things. In J. Faye et al. (Eds.), Facts and events. Poznan studies in philosophy of science (pp. 241–279).
Seibt J. (2000) Ontology as theory of categorial inference. In: Greimann D., Peres C. (eds) Wahrheit-Sein-Struktur. Auseinandersetzungen mit Metaphysik. Olms Verlag, Hildesheim, pp 272–297
Seibt J. (2001) Formal process ontology. In: Welty C., Smith B. (eds) Formal ontology in information systems: Collected papers from the second international conference. ACM Press, Ogunquit, pp 333–345
Seibt J. et al (2002) Quanta, tropes, or processes: On ontologies for QFT beyond the mythof substance. In: Kuhlmann M. (eds) Ontological aspects of quantum field theory. World Scientific, Singapore, pp 53–93–93
Seibt, J. (eds) (2003) Process theories: Analysis and applications of dynamic categories. Kluwer, Dordrecht
Seibt J. (2004) Free process theory: Towards a typology of occurrences. Axiomathes 14: 23–55
Seibt J. (2004) General processes—a study in ontological category construction. Habilitationsschrift University of Konstanz, Germany
Seibt J. (2005) Der Mythos der Substanz. In: Trettin K. (eds) Substanz—Neue Überlegungen zu einer klassischen Kategorie des Seienden. Klostermann, Frankfurt, pp 197–229
Seibt, J. (2007). Beyond endurance and perdurance: Recurrent dynamics. In: Kanzian C. (eds.) Persistence. Frankfurt, Ontos-Verlag, pp 133–165
Seibt, J. (2008). Mereology on processes (submitted).
Sellars W. (1981) Foundations for a metaphysics of pure processes. The Monist 64: 3–90
Simons P. (1987) Parts, a study in ontology. Clarendon, Oxford
Smith T., Stevens G. (1996) Emergence, self-organization, and social interaction: Arousal dependent structure in social systems. Sociological Theory 14: 131–155
Soto A., Sonnenschein C. (2006) Emergentism by default: A view from the bench. Synthese 151: 361–376
Stout R. (1997) Processes. Philosophy 72: 119–127
Tabery J. (2004) Synthesizing activities and interactions in the concept of a mechanism. Philosophy of Science 71: 1–15
Vendler Z. (1967) Linguistics and philosophy. Cornell University Press, Ithaca
Verkuyl H. (1978) Thematic relations and the semantic representation of verbs expressing change. Studies in Language 2: 199–233
Vermaas P., Houkes W. (2003) Ascribing functions to technical artifacts: A challenge to the etiological account of functions. British Journal for Philosophy of Science 54: 261–289
Whitehead A.N. (1929) Process and reality. Macmillan, New York
Wimsatt W. (1986) Forms of aggregativity. In: Donegan A. (eds) Human nature and natural knowledge. Reidel, Dordrecht, pp 259–293
Wimsatt W. (1997) Aggregativity: Reductive heuristics for finding emergence. Philosophy of Science 64: S372–S384
Woodward J. (2002) What is a mechanism? A counterfactual account. Philosophy of Science 69: S366–S377
Zemach E. (1970) Four ontologies. Journal of Philosophy 23: 231–247
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Seibt, J. Forms of emergent interaction in General Process Theory. Synthese 166, 479–512 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-008-9373-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-008-9373-z