Abstract
This paper suggests a critique of the zombie argument that bypasses the need to decide on the truth of its main premises, and specifically, avoids the need to enter the battlefield of whether conceivability entails metaphysical possibility. It is argued that if we accept, as the zombie argument’s supporters would urge us, the assumption that an ideal reasoner can conceive of a complete physical description of the world without conceiving of qualia, the general principle that conceivability entails metaphysical possibility, and the general principle that for any s and t the metaphysical possibility of s & − t entails that s does not necessitate t, we have to conclude not that materialism is false but rather that either materialism or the “mental paint” (or “phenomenist”) conception of phenomenality is false. And further, given the initial advantages of materialism, the fact that proponents of the zombie argument are not allowed to rely on arguments against materialism in confronting this dilemma, and difficulties with arguments in favor of phenomenism, we find ourselves pushed to reject the mental paint conception rather than materialism. Or at any rate, it is hard to see how the proponent of the zombie argument can carry the burden of proof that lies with her. Thus, whether or not those premises of the zombie argument are true, the argument fails to refute materialism.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Armstrong D. (1968) A materialist theory of the mind. Routledge and Kegan Paul, London
Block N. (1990) Inverted earth. Philosophical Perspectives 4: 51–79 doi:10.2307/2214187
Block N. (1995) On a confusion about a function of consciousness. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences 18: 227–247
Block, N. (1996). Mental paint and mental latex. In E. Villanueva (Ed.), Philosophical issues 7: Perception.
Block N. (1998) How not to find the neural correlate of consciousness. In: Hameroff S.A., Kaszniak A.W., Scott A.C. (eds) Toward a science of consciousness II (the second Tuscon discussions and debates). MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
Block N. (2003) Mental paint. In: Hahn M., Ramberg B. (eds) Reflections and replies: Essays on the philosophy of Tyler Burge. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
Block N. (2007) Wittgenstein and sualia. Philosophical Perspectives 21: 73–115
Block N., Stalnaker R. (1999) Conceptual analysis, dualism, and the explanatory gap. The Philosophical Review 108: 1–46 doi:10.2307/2998259
Burge T. (1993) Mind–body causation and explanatory practice. In: Heil J., Mele A. (eds) Mental causation. Clarendon, Oxford
Byrne A. (2002) Int entionalism defended. The Philosophical Review 110: 199–240
Chalmers D. (1996) The conscious mind: In search of a fundamental theory. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Chalmers D. (1999) Materialism and the metaphysics of modality. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 59: 473–493 doi:10.2307/2653685
Chalmers D. (2002) Does conceivability entail possibility?. In: Gendler T., Hawthorne J. (eds) Conceivability and possibility. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Chalmers D. (2003) Consciousness and its place in nature. In: Stich S., Warfield T. (eds) The Blackwell guide to philosophy of mind. Blackwell, Oxford
Chalmers D. (2004) The representational character of experience. In: B. B. (eds) The future for philosophy. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Chalmers D. (2006) Perception and the fall from Eden. In: Gendler T., Hawthorne J. (eds) Perceptual experience. Clarendon Press, Oxford
Chalmers D. (2006) The two-dimensional argument against materialism. In: McLaughlin B. (eds) The Oxford handbook of the philosophy of mind. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Chalmers D., Jackson F. (2001) Conceptual analysis and reductive explanation. The Philosophical Review 110: 315–360
Churchland P.M. (1988) Matter and consciousness (2nd ed). MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
Dennett D.C. (1988) Quining qualia. In: Marcel A., Bisiach E. (eds) Consciousness in modern science. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Dennett D.C. (1991) Consciousness explained. Little, Brown, Bostan
Dennett D.C. (1995) The unimagined preposterousness of zombies: Commentary on Moody, Flanagan, and Polger. Journal of Consciousness Studies 2: 322–326
Dennett, D. C. (1999). The zombie hunch: Extinction of an intuition? Royal Institute of Philosophy Millennial Lecture.
Dretske F.I. (1995) Naturalizing the mind. MIT Press, Cambridge MA
Gendler, T., Hawthorne , J. (eds) (2002) Conceivability and possibility. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Harman, G. (1990). The intrinsic quality of experience. In J. Tomberlin (Ed.), Philosophical perspectives 4: Action theory and the philosophy of mind.
Harman, G. (1996). Explainig objective color in terms of subjective experience. In E. Villanueva (Ed.), Philosophical issues 7: Perception.
Hill C., McLaughlin B.P. (1999) There are fewer things in reality than are dreamt of in Chalmers’s philosophy. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 59: 445–454 doi:10.2307/2653682
Honderich T. (1984) The time of a conscious sensory experience and mind–brain theories. Journal of Theoretical Biology 110: 115–129 doi:10.1016/S0022-5193(84)80018-1
Horgan J., Tienson J. (2002) The intentionality of phenomenology and the phenomenology of intentionality. In: Chalmers D. (eds) Philosophy of mind: Classical and contemporary readings. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 520–33
Jackson F. (1982) Epiphenomenal qualia. The Philosophical Quarterly 32: 127–136 doi:10.2307/2960077
Jacobson-Horowitz, H. The scientific untraceability of phenomenal consciousness. Philosophia (forthcoming).
Kim J. (1998) Mind in a physical world: An assay on the mind-body problem and mental causation. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
Kim J. (2005) Physicalism, or something near enough. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Kirk R. (1974) Zombies v. materialists. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 48: 135–152
Levine J. (2001) Purple haze: The problem of consciousness. Oxford University Press, New York
Levine J. (2003) Experience and representation. In: Smith Q., Jokic A. (eds) Consciousness. Clarendon Press, Oxford
Libet B., Wright E.W., Feinstein B., Pearl D.K. (1979) Subjective referral of the timing for a conscious sensory experience: A functional role for the somatosensory specific projection system in man. Brain 102: 193–224 doi:10.1093/brain/102.1.193
Loar B. (1997) Phenomenal states: Second version. In: Block N., Flanagan O., Guzeldier G. (eds) Consciousness. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
Loar B. (1999) David Chalmers’s The Conscious Mind. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 59: 465–472 doi:10.2307/2653684
Lucas J.R. (1961) Minds, machines and Gödel. Philosophy (London, England) 36: 120–124
Lycan W.G. (1995) Consciousness as internal monitoring. Philosophical Perspectives 9: 1–14 doi:10.2307/2214210
Lycan W.G. (1996) Consciousness and experience. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
McLaughlin B.P. (1994) Epiphenomenalism. In: Guttenplan S. (eds) A companion to the philosophy of mind. Blackwell, Oxford
Papineau D. (2002) Thinking about consciousness. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Plantinga A. (2006) Against materialism. Faith and Philosophy 23: 3–32
Popper K.R., Eccles J.C. (1977) The self and its brain. Springer, Berlin
Putnam H. (1975) The nature of mental states. In: Putnam H. (eds) language and reality: Philosophical papers (Vol. 2). Cambridge University Press, Mind
Quine W.V.O. (1960) Word and object. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
Rey G. (1997) Contemporary philosophy of mind: A contentiously classical approach. Blackwell, Oxford
Searle J.R. (1992) The rediscovery of the mind. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
Shoemaker S. (1999) On David Chalmers’s the conscious mind. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 59: 439–444 doi:10.2307/2653681
Tye M. (1995) Ten problems of consciousness. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
Tye M. (2000) Consciousness, color, and content. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
Yablo S. (1999) Concepts and consciousness. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 59: 455–463 doi:10.2307/2653683
Yablo S. (2002) Coulda, Woulda, Shoulda. In: Gendler T., Hawthorne J. (eds) Conceivability and possibility. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Horowitz, A. Turning the zombie on its head. Synthese 170, 191–210 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-008-9367-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-008-9367-x