Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Mental time travel, somatic markers and “myopia for the future”

  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Patients with damage to the ventromedial prefrontal cortex (VMPFC) are often described as having impaired ability for planning and decision making despite retaining intact capacities for explicit reasoning. The somatic marker hypothesis is that the VMPFC associates implicitly represented affective information with explicit representations of actions or outcomes. Consequently, when the VMPFC is damaged explicit reasoning is no longer scaffolded by affective information, leading to characteristic deficits. These deficits are exemplified in performance on the Iowa Gambling Task (IGT) in which subjects with VMPFC perform significantly worse than neurotypicals in a task which requires them learn from rewarding and punishing experience to make decisions. The somatic marker theory adopts a canonical theory of emotion, in which emotions function as part of a valencing system, to explain the role of affective processes. The first part of the paper argues against this canonical account. The second part provides a different account of the role of the role of the VMPFC in decision-making which does not depend on the canonical account of emotion. Together the first and second parts of the paper provide the basis for a different interpretation of results on the Iowa Gambling Task (IGT). In fact the IGT may be probing a deficit in what has been called mental time travel: the ability to access and use information from previous experience and imaginatively rehearse future experiences as part of the process of deliberation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bayley P.J., Hopkins R.O., Squire L.R. (2006). The fate of old memories after medial temporal lobe damage. Journal of Neuroscience 26:13331–13337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bechara A., Damasio A.R. (2005). The somatic marker hypothesis: A neural theory of economic decision. Games and Economic Behaviour 52:336–372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bechara A., Damasio H., Damasio A., et al. (1999). Differential contributions of the human amygdala and ventromedial prefrontal cortex to human decision-making. The Journal of Neuroscience 19:5473–5481

    Google Scholar 

  • Berridge K.C., Robinson T.E. (2003). Parsing reward. Trends in Neuroscience 26:507–513

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braver T.S., Barch D.M., et al. (1999). Cognition and control in schizophrenia: A computational model of dopamine and prefrontal function. Biological Psychiatry 46:312–328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braver T., Cohen J. (1999). On the control of control: The role of dopamine in regulating prefrontal function and working memory. In: Monsell S., Driver J. (eds). Attention and performance XVIII: Control of cognitive processes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 713–737

    Google Scholar 

  • Clayton N.S., Bussey T., et al. (2003). Can animals recall the past and plan for the future? Nature Reviews Neuroscience 4:685–691

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colombetti G. (2005). Appraising valence. Journal of Consciousness Studies 12:8–10

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Argembeau A., Van der Linden M. (2006). Individual differences in the phenomenology of mental time travel: The effect of vivid visual imagery and emotion regulation strategies. Consciousness and Cognition 15(2):342–350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Damasio A.R. (1994). Descartes’ error: Emotion, reason and the human brain. New York, Putnam

    Google Scholar 

  • Damasio A., Tranel D., et al. (1990). Individuals with sociopathic behaviour caused by frontal lobe damage fail to respond autonomically to socially charged stimuli. Behavioural and Brain Research 14:81–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Damasio A.R., Tranel D., et al. (1991). Somatic markers and the guidance of behaviour: Theory and preliminary testing. In: Levin H.S., Eisenberg H.M., Benton A.L. (eds). Frontal lobe function and dysfunction. New York, Oxford University Press, pp. 217–229

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn B.D., Dalgleish T., Lawrence A.D. (2006). The somatic marker hypothesis: A critical evaluation. Neuroscience and Biobehavioural Reviews 30:239–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Egelman D.M., Person C., Montague P.R. (1998). The computational role of dopamine delivery. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 10:623–630

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eichenbaum H. (1998). Amnesia, the hippocampus and episodic memory (editorial). 8:197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faulkner, D., & Foster, J. K. (2002). The decoupling of “explicit” and “implicit” processing in neuropsychological disorders: Insights into the neural basis of consciousness?. Psyche, 8(2), http://psyche.cs.monash.edu.au/v8/psyche-8-02-faulkner.html.

  • Frith C.D. (1996). The role of the prefrontal cortex in self-consciousness: The case of auditory hallucinations. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London 351(B):1505–1512

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabrieli J.D.E., Keane M.M., Zarella M.M., Poldrack R.A. (1997). Preservation of implicit memory for new associations in global amnesia. Psychological Science 8:326–329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grace A. (1991). Phasic versus tonic dopamine release and the modulation of dopamine responsivity: A hypothesis of the etiology of schizophrenia. Neuroscience 41:1–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graf P., Schacter D. (1985). Implicit memory for new associations in normal and amnesic subjects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 11:501–518

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gutbrod K., Krouzel C., Hofer H., et al. (2006). Decision-making in amnesia: Do advantageous decisions require conscious knowledge of previous behavioural choices? Neuropsychologia 44(8):1315–1324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heims H., Critchley H., et al. (2004). Social and motivational functioning is not critically dependent on feedback of autonomic responses: Neuropsychological evidence from patients with pure autonomic failure. Neuropsychologia 39:521–524

    Google Scholar 

  • Kapur S., Craik F.I.M., Jones C., Brown G.M., Houle S., Tulving E. (1995). Functional role of the prefrontal cortex in retrieval of memories: A PET study. Neuroreport 14:1880–1884

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keane M.M., Gabrieli J.D.E., Mapstone H., Johnson K.A., Corkin S. (1995). Double dissociation of memory capacities after bilateral occipital-lobe or medial temporal-lobe lesions. Brain 118:1129–1148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein S.B., Loftus J., et al. (2002). Memory and temporal experience: The effects of episodic memory loss on an amnesic patient’s ability to rememberrthe past and imagine the future. Social Cognition 20:353–379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knight R.T. (1999). Prefrontal cortex regulates inhibition and excitation in distributed neural networrks. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavia 101:159–178

    Google Scholar 

  • Levine B., Turner G.T., Tisserand D.J., Graham S.I., Hevenor S.J., McIntosh A.R. (2004). The functional neuroanatomy of episodic and semantic autobiographical remembering: A prospective study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 16:1633–1646

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levine B., Freedman M., Dawson D., Black S.E., Stuss D.T. (1999). Ventral frontal contribution to self-regulation: Convergence of episodic memory and inhibition. Neurocase 5:263–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maia T.V., McClelland J.L (2004). A reexamination of the evidence for the somatic marker hypothesis: What participants really know in the Iowa gambling task. Proceedings of the National Academy for Science USA 10:16075–16080

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maia T.V., McClelland J.L. (2005). The somatic marker hypothesis: Still many questions but no answers. Trends in Cognitive Science 9:162–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller E., Cohen J.D. (2001). An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function. Annual Review of Neuroscience 24:167–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore H., Grace A. (1999). The regulation of forebrain dopamine transmission: Relevance to the pathophysiology and psychopathology of schizophrenia. Biological Psychiatry 46:40–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Reilly R., Munakata Y. (2000). Computational explorations in cognitive neuroscience. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultz W., Dayan P., Montague P.R. (1997). A neural substrate of prediction and reward. Science 275:1593–1599

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schweinberger S., Burton M. (2003). Covert recognition and the neural system for face processing. Cortex 39:9–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith A., Li M., Becker S., Kapur S. (2006). Dopamine, prediction error, and associative learning: A model-based account. Network: Computation in Neural Systems 17:61–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steinvorth S., Corkin S., et al. (2006). Ecphory of autobiographical memories: An fMRI study of recent and remote memory retrieval. NeuroImage 30(1):285–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suddendorf T. (2006). Foresight and evolution of the human mind. Science 312:1006–1007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suddendorf T., Busby J. (2003). Mental Time Travel in Animals. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7:391–396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suddendorf T., Busby J. (2005). Making decisions with the future in mind: Developmental and comparative identification of mental time travel. Learning & Motivation 36:110–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suddendorf T., Corballis M.C. (1997). Mental time travel and the evolution of the human mind. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs 123:133–167

    Google Scholar 

  • Suddendorf, T., & Corballis, M. C. (in press). The evolution of foresight: What is mental time travel and is it unique to humans? Behavioral and Brain Sciences (in press).

  • Tomb I., Hauser M., Deldin P., Caramazza A. (2002). Do somatic markers mediate decisions on the gambling task?. Nature Neuroscience 5:1103–1104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tranel D., Damasio A.R. (1988). Knowledge without awareness: An autonomic index of facial recognition in prosopagnosics. Science 228:1453–1454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tulving E. (2002). Episodic Memory: from mind to brain. Annual Review of Psychology 53:1–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallis J.D., Miller E.K. (2003). Neuronal activity in primate dorsolateral and orbital prefrontal cortex during performance of a reward preference task. European Journal Neuroscience 18:2069

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waltz J., Knowlton B., Holyoak K., Boone K., Mishkin F., De Menezes Santos M., Thomas C., Miller B. (1999). A system for relational reasoning in the prefrontal cortex. Psychological Science 10:119–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler M.A., Stuss D., Tulving E. (1997). Toward a theory of episodic memory: The fronal lobes and autonoetic consciousness. Psychological Bulletin 121:331–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood J., Grafman J. (2003). Human prefrontal cortex. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 4:139–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young A.W., Burton A.M. (1999). Simulating face recognition: Implications for modelling cognition. Cognitive Neuropsychology 16:1–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zentall T.R. (2006). Mental time travel in animals: a challenging question. Behavioral Processes 72:173–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Philosophy, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia

    Philip Gerrans

Authors
  1. Philip Gerrans
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Philip Gerrans.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gerrans, P. Mental time travel, somatic markers and “myopia for the future”. Synthese 159, 459–474 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-007-9238-x

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-007-9238-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation