Skip to main content
Log in

Post-genomics, between reduction and emergence

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It is frequently said that biology is emerging from a long phase of reductionism. It would be certainly more correct to say that biologists are abandoning a certain form of reductionism. We describe this past form, and the experiments which challenged the previous vision. To face the difficulties which were met, biologists use a series of concepts and metaphors - pleiotropy, tinkering, epigenetics - the ambiguity of which masks the difficulties, instead of solving them. In a similar way, the word “post-genomics” has different meanings, depending upon who uses it. Which of these meanings will become dominant in the future is an open question.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen G.E. (1978). Thomas H. Morgan, The man and his science (p. 270). Princeton, NJ Princeton University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen G.E. (2000). The reception of Mendelism in the United States, 1900–1930. Comptes Rendus de l’ Academic des Sciences. Paris, Sciences de la vie, 323: 1081–1088

  • Brown P.O., Botstein D. (1999). Exploring the new world of the genome with DNA arrays. Nature Genetics Supplement, 21, 33–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer E.P., Lipson C. (1988). Thinking about science: Max Delbrück and the origins of molecular biology. New York, W. W. Norton

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenspan R.J. (2001). The flexible genome. Nature Reviews/Genetics, 2, 383–387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacob F. (1973). The logic of life. Princeton, NJ Princeton University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacob F. (1977). Evolution and tinkering. Science, 196, 1161–1166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jasny B.R., Ray L.B. (2003). Life and the art of networks. Science, 301: 1863 et s

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keller E.F. (1995). Refiguring life: Metaphors of twentieth century biology. New York, Columbia University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn T.S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago, University of Chicago Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence P.A. (2001). Science or alchemy?. Nature Reviews/Genetics, 2, 139–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morange M. (2000). Gene action. Comptes Rendus de l’ Academic des Sciences. Paris, Sciences de la vie, 323, 1147–1153

    Google Scholar 

  • Morange, M. (2002). The relations between genetics and epigenetics: a historical point of view. In L. van Speybroeck, G. van de Vijver, & D. de Waele (Eds.), From epigenesis to epigenetics Annals of the New York Acadamy of Sciences (Vol. 981, pp. 50–60).

  • Morange M. (2003). La vie expliquée? 50 ans après la double hélice. Paris, Odile Jacob

    Google Scholar 

  • Moss L. (2002). What genes can’t do. Cambridge, Mass MIT Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Waddington C. (1942). L’épigénotype. Endeavour, 1, 18–20

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michel Morange.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Morange, M. Post-genomics, between reduction and emergence. Synthese 151, 355–360 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-006-9029-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-006-9029-9

Keywords

Navigation