Skip to main content
Log in

Conjunctions, Disjunctions and Lewisian Semantics for Counterfactuals

  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Consider the reasonable axioms of subjunctive conditionals (1) if p q 1 and p q 2 at some world, then p (q 1 & q 2) at that world, and (2) if p 1 q and p 2 q at some world, then (p 1p 2) q at that world, where p q is the subjunctive conditional. I show that a Lewis-style semantics for subjunctive conditionals satisfies these axioms if and only if one makes a certain technical assumption about the closeness relation, an assumption that is probably false. I will then show how Lewisian semantics can be modified so as to assure (1) and (2) even when the technical assumption fails, and in fact in one sense the semantics actually becomes simpler then.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • D. Lewis, Counterfactuals. Malden, MA/Oxford: Blackwell (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Lewis, ‘Counterfactual Dependence and Time’s Arrow’. Noûs 13 (1979) 455-476

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • A. R. Pruss, ‘The Cardinality Objection to David Lewis’s Modal Realism’. Philosophical Studies 104 (2001) 167-176

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alexander R. Pruss.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pruss, A.R. Conjunctions, Disjunctions and Lewisian Semantics for Counterfactuals. Synthese 156, 33–52 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-005-3487-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-005-3487-3

Keywords

Navigation