Skip to main content
Log in

A supervised active learning method for identifying critical nodes in IoT networks

  • Published:
The Journal of Supercomputing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The energy efficiency of wireless sensor networks (WSNs) as a key feature of the Internet of Things (IoT) and fifth-generation (5G) mobile networks is determined by several key characteristics, such as hop count, user’s location, allocated power, and relay. Identifying important nodes, known as critical nodes, in IoT networks that involve a massive number of interconnected devices and sensors significantly affects these characteristics. However, it also requires a significant computational overhead and energy consumption. To address this issue, we introduce a novel supervised active learning method for identifying critical nodes in IoT networks aimed at enhancing the energy efficiency of WSNs in 5G environments. Our experimental results, designed to closely replicate varied and complex IoT network scenarios focusing on mission-critical multi-hop IoT applications, demonstrate the proposed method’s capability to improve adaptability and computational efficiency. These results suggest a strong potential for mission-critical applications in real-world large-scale multi-hop WSN environments in 5G, as well as massively distributed IoT.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

No datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.

Notes

  1. General Algebraic Modeling System (GAMS). Available: https://www.gams.com/.

  2. C Programming Language EXtended (CPLEX). Available: https://www.gams.com/latest/docs/S_CPLEX.html.

References

  1. Yu T, Zhang S, Chen X, Wang X (2022) A novel energy efficiency metric for next generation green wireless communication network design. IEEE Internet Things J 10:1746–1760

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Gorla P, Deshmukh A, Joshi S, Chamola V, Guizani M (2022) A game theoretic analysis for power management and cost optimization of green base stations in 5G and beyond communication networks. IEEE Trans Netw Serv Manag 19(3):2714–2725

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Qi X, Khattak S, Zaib A, Khan I (2021) Energy efficient resource allocation for 5G heterogeneous networks using genetic algorithm. IEEE Access 9:160510–160520

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Park HJ, Kim HW, Chae SH (2023) Deep-learning-based resource allocation for transmit power minimization in uplink noma IoT cellular networks. IEEE Trans Cognit Commun Netw 9(3):708–721

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Basman M A-N, Alhumaima RS, Ali WH (2022) On the quality of service of next generation green networks. IET Netw 11(1):1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ericsson (2020) Ericsson mobility report. Mobile data traffic outlook

  7. Ishfaq Bashir Sofi and Akhil Gupta (2018) A survey on energy efficient 5G green network with a planned multi-tier architecture. J Netw Comput Appl 118:1–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Usama M, Erol-Kantarci M (2019) A survey on recent trends and open issues in energy efficiency of 5G. Sensors 19(14):3126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Shie W, Yin R, Celimuge W (2020) Heterogeneity-aware energy saving and energy efficiency optimization in dense small cell networks. IEEE Access 8:178670–178684

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Yildiz HU, Tavli B, Ojaghi Kahjogh B, Dogdu E (2017) The impact of incapacitation of multiple critical sensor nodes on wireless sensor network lifetime. IEEE Wirel Commun Lett 6(3):306–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kahjogh BO, Demirkol I, Careglio D, Pascual JD (2017) The impact of critical node elimination on the latency of wireless sensor networks. In: 2017 9th International Conference on Ubiquitous and Future Networks (ICUFN), IEEE, pp 182–187

  12. Zheng K, Liu X-Y, Luoyi F, Wang X, Zhu Y (2020) Energy efficiency in multihop wireless networks with unreliable links. IEEE Trans Netw Sci Eng 7(1):576–588

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Parzysz F, Mai V, Gagnon F (2013) Energy minimization for the half-duplex relay channel with decode-forward relaying. IEEE Trans Commun 61(6):2232–2247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Zou Y, Zhu J, Jiang X (2020) Joint power splitting and relay selection in energy-harvesting communications for IoT networks. IEEE Internet Things J 7(1):584–597

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ding X, Zou Y, Chen X, Wang X, Hanzo L (2020) Secrecy outage and diversity analysis of multiple cooperating source-destination pairs. IEEE Trans Veh Technol 69(7):7648–7662

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Dagdeviren O, Akram VK, Tavli B (2018) Design and evaluation of algorithms for energy efficient and complete determination of critical nodes for wireless sensor network reliability. IEEE Trans Reliab 68(1):280–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ojaghi B, Adelantado F, Kartsakli E, Antonopoulos A, Verikoukis C (2019) Sliced-RAN: joint slicing and functional split in future 5G radio access networks. In: ICC 2019-2019 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC), IEEE, pp 1–6

  18. Wang Z, Zhiwen Yu CL, Chen P, You J, Tianlong G, Wong H-S, Zhang J (2018) Clustering by local gravitation. IEEE transactions on cybernetics 48(5):1383–1396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Cortes C, Vapnik V (1995) Support-vector networks. Mach Learn 20(3):273–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Li Y, Liao C, Wang Y, Wang C (2015) Energy-efficient optimal relay selection in cooperative cellular networks based on double auction. IEEE Trans Wirel Commun 14(8):4093–4104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Cheng Y, Zhang J, Zhang J, Zhao H, Yang L, Zhu H (2022) Small-cell sleeping and association for energy-harvesting-aided cellular IoT with full-duplex self-backhauls: a game-theoretic approach. IEEE Internet Things J 9(3):2304–2318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Muhammad Umar F, Wang X, Hawbani A, Khan A, Ahmed A, Alsamhi S, Qureshi B (2022) Power: probabilistic weight-based energy-efficient cluster routing for large-scale wireless sensor networks. J Supercomput 78(10):12765–12791

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Archana Bomnale and Avinash More (2023) Node utilization index-based data routing and aggregation protocol for energy-efficient wireless sensor networks. J Supercomput. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-023-05800-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Tang J, Peng Z, So DKC, Zhang X, Wong K-K, Jonathon A C (2023) Energy efficiency optimization for a multiuser IRS-aided MISO system with SWIPT. IEEE Trans Commun 71(10):5950–5962

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Huang Y, Zhu C, Wu L, Zhang Z, Dang J (2023) Energy-efficient hybrid precoding with a grouped-adaptive-connected structure. In: 2023 21st International Symposium on Modeling and Optimization in Mobile, Ad Hoc, and Wireless Networks (WiOpt), pp 95–102

  26. Mobile VCE (2019) Power amplifiers for 4G and beyond–managing the efficiency, bandwidth and linearity tradeoff. http://www.mobilevce.com/green-radio. Accessed Oct 2019

  27. Tan R, Shi Y, Fan Y, Zhu W, Tong W (2022) Energy saving technologies and best practices for 5G radio access network. IEEE Access 10:51747–51756

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Line MP, Larsen HL, Christiansen SR, Berger MS (2023) Toward greener 5G and beyond radio access networks–a survey. IEEE Open J Commun Soc 4:768–797

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Ranaweera C, Wong E, Nirmalathas A, Jayasundara C, Lim C (2017) 5G c-ran architecture: a comparison of multiple optical fronthaul networks. In: 2017 International Conference on Optical Network Design and Modeling (ONDM), pp 1–6

  30. Maule M, Kohjogh O, Rezazadeh F (2022) Advanced cloud-based network management for 5G C-RAN. Springer, Cham, pp 371–397

    Google Scholar 

  31. Ojaghi B, Adelantado F, Verikoukis C (2023) On the benefits of vdu standardization in softwarized ng-ran: Enabling technologies, challenges, and opportunities. IEEE Commun Mag 61(4):92–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Yue W, Zuo P, Li W, Zhang Y, Zhang Y, Li C, Huang J (2023) Critical nodes identification: a non-cooperative method for unknown topology information in ad hoc networks. China Commun 20(7):217–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Cobanlar M, Yildiz HU, Akram VK, Dagdeviren O, Tavli B (2022) On the tradeoff between network lifetime and k-connectivity-based reliability in UWSNs. IEEE Internet Things J 9(23):24444–24452

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Dagdeviren ZA, Akram VK, Dagdeviren O, Tavli B, Yanikomeroglu H (2022) k-connectivity in wireless sensor networks: overview and future research directions. IEEE Netw 37:1–7

    Google Scholar 

  35. Akram VK, Ugurlu O (2023) Detecting the most vital articulation points in wireless multi-hop networks. IEEE/ACM Trans Netw 31(5):2389–2402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Han G, Juntao T, Liu L, Martínez-García M, Peng Y (2021) Anomaly detection based on multidimensional data processing for protecting vital devices in 6G-enabled massive IIoT. IEEE Internet Things J 8(7):5219–5229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Sepas-Moghaddam A, Arabshahi A, Yazdani D, Dehshibi MM (2012) A novel hybrid algorithm for optimization in multimodal dynamic environments. In: 2012 12th International Conference on Hybrid Intelligent Systems (HIS), IEEE, pp 143–148

  38. Dehshibi MM, Sourizaei M, Fazlali M, Talaee O, Samadyar H, Shanbehzadeh J (2017) A hybrid bio-inspired learning algorithm for image segmentation using multilevel thresholding. Multimed Tools Appl 76(14):15951–15986

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Maaten L, Hinton G (2008) Visualizing data using t-SNE. J Mach Learn Res 9:2579–2605

    Google Scholar 

  40. Hao Yu, Chen H, Zhao S, Shi Q (2020) Distributed soft clustering algorithm for IoT based on finite time average consensus. IEEE Internet Things J 8(21):16096–16107

    Google Scholar 

  41. Suykens JAK, Vandewalle J (1999) Least squares support vector machine classifiers. Neural Process Lett 9(3):293–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

This work has been partially supported by the BODYinTRANSIT project as part of the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 101002711 and the projects AEON-ZERO (TSI-063000-2021-52), FREE-6G (TSI-063000-2021-144), AROMA3D (TSI-063000-2021-70/71), 6G-OASIS (TSI-063000-2021-24), SUCCESS-6G (TSI-063000-2021-39/40/41) and ADV5GTWN (TSI-063000-2021-112/113/114) under the UNICO5G-RPTR programme.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Behnam proposes the main idea and methods. Mohammad implements experiments and writes this article. Angelos analyzes the experimental data and revises the structure of manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Behnam Ojaghi.

Ethics declarations

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ojaghi, B., Dehshibi, M.M. & Antonopoulos, A. A supervised active learning method for identifying critical nodes in IoT networks. J Supercomput (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-024-06103-y

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-024-06103-y

Keywords

Navigation