Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Cyber–physical energy system toward safety in smart grids

  • Published:
The Journal of Supercomputing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The power system operation, stability, and reliability are strongly dependent on the network protection system performance. On the other hand, the penetration of the renewable energy power plants into power grids drastically affects power networks and smart grids’ stability and reliability because of their fast dynamics in comparison to conventional power generators. Hence, power networks are considered as a complex cyber–physical energy system with vast interactions and communications among consumers and generators. In this condition, a reliable monitoring and control system can augment the safety, security, and operation of such an intricate system. Suitable time coordination between the operations of power grids protection relays is one of the most challenging issues to protect the power system properly. In this paper, a reliable supervisor system (RSS) with fast and precise control ability is proposed to improve power systems and smart grids protection system operations. The device utilizes a safe robust communication way which provides a condition for the available relays on two sides of a line to share their data. For this reason, the proposed device is able to diagnose the fault on a short transmission line quickly upon the event occurrence. In other words, fast communication between two sides of a short transmission line helps the protection system to work faster in the presence of a fault. In addition, quick handshaking and data sharing of the network different points provided by the RSS enable grid circuit breakers to disconnect a fault from the system as fast as possible. The proposed system, then, can easily find a defect location and disconnect a faulty line from the grid. According to the experimental results provided in this paper, the RSS can effectively corroborate the network stability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23
Fig. 24
Fig. 25
Fig. 26
Fig. 27
Fig. 28
Fig. 29
Fig. 30
Fig. 31
Fig. 32
Fig. 33
Fig. 34
Fig. 35
Fig. 36
Fig. 37
Fig. 38

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wang W, Loman J, Vassiliou P (2004) Reliability importance of components in a complex system. In: Reliability and Maintainability, 2004 Annual Symposium-RAMS, IEEE, pp 6–11

  2. Mitolo M, Montazemi P (2014) Electrical safety in the industrial workplace: an IEC point of view. In: 2014 IEEE IAS Electrical Safety Workshop (ESW), IEEE, February 2014, pp 1–8

  3. Byrne J, Mun YM (2003) Rethinking reform in the electricity sector: power liberalisation or energy transformation. In: Wamukonya N (ed) Electricity reform: social and environmental challenges. UNEP-RISØ Centre, Roskilde, pp 48–76

    Google Scholar 

  4. Enslin JH, Heskes PJ (2004) Harmonic interaction between a large number of distributed power inverters and the distribution network. IEEE Trans Power Electron 19(6):1586–1593

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ulbig A, Borsche TS, Andersson G (2014) Impact of low rotational inertia on power system stability and operation. IFAC Proc Vol 47(3):7290–7297. https://doi.org/10.3182/20140824-6-za-1003.02615

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Tielens P, Van Hertem D (2012) Grid inertia and frequency control in power systems with high penetration of renewables

  7. Begovic M, Novosel D, Milisavljevic M (2001) Trends in power system protection and control. Decis Support Syst 30(3):269–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Rasmussen TB et al (2017) A review of cyber-physical energy system security assessment. In: 2017 IEEE Manchester PowerTech, IEEE

  9. Ibrahim A, Valli C, McAteer I, Chaudhry J (2018) A security review of local government using NIST CSF: a case study. J Supercomput 74(10):5171–5186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Banerjee A, Venkatasubramanian KK, Mukherjee T, Gupta SKS (2012) Ensuring safety, security, and sustainability of mission-critical cyber-physical systems. Proc IEEE 100(1):283–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Bordel B, Alcarria R, de Rivera DS, Robles T (2018) Process execution in cyber-physical systems using cloud and cyber-physical internet services. J Supercomput 74(8):4127–4169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Jabbar S, Khan M, Silva BN, Han K (2018) A REST-based industrial web of things’ framework for smart warehousing. J Supercomput 74(9):4419–4433

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Sedjelmaci H, Senouci SM (2018) Cyber security methods for aerial vehicle networks: taxonomy, challenges and solution. J Supercomput 74(10):4928–4944

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Yang W, Wang S, Zheng G, Chaudhry J, Valli C (2018) ECB4CI: an enhanced cancelable biometric system for securing critical infrastructures. J Supercomput 74(10):4893–4909

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Safkhani M, Shariat M (2018) Implementation of secret disclosure attack against two IoT lightweight authentication protocols. J Supercomput 74(11):6220–6235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Union for the Co-ordination of Transmission of Electricity (2007) System disturbance on 4 November 2006, UCTE, Final Report

  17. The Smart Grid Interoperability Panel Cyber Security Working Group (2010) Introduction to NISTIR 7628 guidelines for smart grid cyber security. http://csrc.nist.gov/publications/nistir/ir7628/introduction-to-nistir-7628.pdf. Accessed Sept 2010

  18. Khosravi MR, Akbarzadeh O, Salari SR, Samadi S, Rostami H (2017) An introduction to ENVI tools for synthetic aperture radar (SAR) image despeckling and quantitative comparison of denoising filters. In: IEEE International Conference on Power, Control, Signals and Instrumentation Engineering, ICPCSI 2017, India, pp 212–215

  19. Khosravi MR, Samadi S, Akbarzadeh O (2017) Determining the optimal range of angle tracking radars. In: IEEE International Conference on Power, Control, Signals and Instrumentation Engineering, ICPCSI 2017, India, pp 212–215

  20. Wan S, Gu Z, Ni Q (2019) Cognitive computing and wireless communications on the edge for healthcare service robots. Comput Commun 149:99–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Khosravi MR, Khosravi A, Shadloo-Jahromi M, Keshavarz A (2015) A novel fake color scheme based on depth protection for MR passive/optical sensors. In: Conference Proceedings of 2015 2nd International Conference on Knowledge-Based Engineering and Innovation, KBEI 2015, Iran, pp 362–367

  22. Qi L, Zhang X, Li S, Wan S, Wen Y, Gong W (2020) Spatial-temporal data-driven service recommendation with privacy-preservation. Inf Sci 515:91–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Wan S, Goudos S (2020) Faster R-CNN for multi-class fruit detection using a robotic vision system. Comput Netw 168:107036

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Khosravi MR, Yazdi M (2018) A lossless data hiding scheme for medical images using a hybrid solution based on IBRW error histogram computation and quartered interpolation with greedy weights. Neural Comput Appl 30(7):2017–2028

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Choi K, Lim SH, Kim JH (2018) Cost-effective monitoring algorithm for cyber-physical system platform using combined spatio-temporal model. J Supercomput 74(8):3537–3548

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Anderson PM, Anderson P (1999) Power system protection. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  27. Horowitz SH, Phadke AG (2008) Power system relaying, vol 22. Wiley, Hoboken

    Book  Google Scholar 

  28. Qi L, Dou W, Wang W, Li G, Yu H, Wan S (2018) Dynamic mobile crowdsourcing selection for electricity load forecasting. IEEE Access 6:46926–46937

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Das JC (2016) Power system analysis: short-circuit load flow and harmonics. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  30. Liscouski B, Elliot W (2004) Final report on the August 14, 2003 blackout in the United States and Canada: causes and recommendations. A report to US Department of Energy, vol 40, no 4, p 86

  31. Ma J, Liu C, Thorp JS (2016) A wide-area backup protection algorithm based on distance protection fitting factor. IEEE Trans Power Deliv 31(5):2196–2205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Coffele F, Booth C, Dyśko A (2015) An adaptive overcurrent protection scheme for distribution networks. IEEE Trans Power Deliv 30(2):561–568

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. McDonald JD (2016) Electric power substations engineering. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Book  Google Scholar 

  34. Tekdemir IG, Alboyaci B (2017) A novel approach for improvement of power swing blocking and deblocking functions in distance relays. IEEE Trans Power Deliv 32(4):1986–1994

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Sivanagaraju G, Chakrabarti S, Srivastava SC (2014) Uncertainty in transmission line parameters: estimation and impact on line current differential protection. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas 63(6):1496–1504

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Paithankar Y (2017) Transmission network protection: theory and practice. Routledge, Abingdon

    Book  Google Scholar 

  37. Chung M, Ahn W, Min B, Seo J, Moon J (2018) An analytical method for developing appropriate protection profiles of Instrumentation & Control System for nuclear power plants. J Supercomput 74(3):1378–1393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Hussain MH, Rahim SRA, Musirin I (2013) Optimal overcurrent relay coordination: a review. Procedia Eng 53:332–336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Jamali S, Shateri H (2005) Optimal siting of recloser and sectionalizers to reduce non-distributed energy. In: Transmission and Distribution Conference Exhibition, Asia and Pacific, pp 1–7

  40. Roberts J, Altuve HJ, Hou D (2001) Review of ground fault protection methods for grounded, ungrounded, and compensated distribution systems. SEL, Pullman, pp 1–40

    Google Scholar 

  41. Chen J, He ZY, Jiang W (2011) The overview of protection schemes for distribution systems containing micro-grid. In: 2011 Asia-Pacific IEEE Power and Energy Engineering Conference (APPEEC), March 2011, pp 1–4

  42. Bertrand P (1998) Directional protection equipment. Schneider-Electric, Cahier Technique, ECT No. 181, March 1998

  43. Conti S (2009) Analysis of distribution network protection issues in presence of dispersed generation. Electr Power Syst Res 79(1):49–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Givelberg M, Lysenko E, Zelichonok R (1999) Zero sequence directional earth-fault protection with improved characteristics for compensated distribution networks. Electr Power Syst Res 52(3):217–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Dewadasa M, Ghosh A, Ledwich G (2009) An inverse time admittance relay for fault detection in distribution networks containing DGs

  46. Xiangjun Z, Li KK, Zigang G, Sheng S (2004) Some ground fault protection schemes implemented on FTU for industrial power systems. In: Industry Applications Conference, vol 4, pp 2453–2457

  47. Guelfand Ya S (1987) Protection of distribution networks. Energoatomizdat, Moscow

    Google Scholar 

  48. Doi H, Serizawa Y, Tode H, Ikeda H (1999) Simulation study of QoS guaranteed ATM transmission for future power system communication. IEEE Trans Power Deliv 14(2):342–348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Serizawa Y, Shimizu K, Fujikawa F, Myoujin M (1999) ATM transmissions of microprocessor-based current differential teleprotection signals. IEEE Trans Power Deliv 14(2):335–341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Ericsson GN (2010) Cyber security and power system communication—essential parts of a smart grid infrastructure. IEEE Trans Power Deliv 25(3):1501–1507

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Morris TH et al (2013) Deterministic intrusion detection rules for MODBUS protocols. In: System Sciences (HICSS), 46th Hawaii International Conference, pp 1773–1781

  52. Swales A (1999) Open Modbus/TCP specification. Schneider Electric, vol 29

Download references

Acknowledgements

Authors gratefully acknowledge the contributions of the Fars Regional Electric Company and Eram Sanat Mooj Gostar Company for equipment-sharing and support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Research and Development, Eram Sanat Mooj Gostar Company, Shiraz, Fars, Iran

    Emad Roshandel, Faraj-Allah Dolatkhahi, Ali Hosseinzadeh & Hamid Davazdah-Emami

  2. College of Science and Engineering, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia

    Emad Roshandel

  3. Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran

    Faraj-Allah Dolatkhahi, Ali Hosseinzadeh & Hamid Davazdah-Emami

Authors
  1. Emad Roshandel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Faraj-Allah Dolatkhahi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ali Hosseinzadeh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Hamid Davazdah-Emami
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Emad Roshandel.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Roshandel, E., Dolatkhahi, FA., Hosseinzadeh, A. et al. Cyber–physical energy system toward safety in smart grids. J Supercomput 76, 9031–9062 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-020-03204-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-020-03204-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation