Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Development of fuzzy approach to predict the fetus safety and growth using AFI

  • Published:
The Journal of Supercomputing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Nowadays, prediction of abnormality plays a vital role in healthcare applications for deciding the treatment and guiding for proper treatment on time. The amniotic fluid is the water of the womb, and it is a strong indicator of congenital fetal anomaly. The automatic calculation of amniotic fluid index (AFI) and shape features of varying gestational periods will be useful to predict the perinatal outcome of high risk in maternity patients. Some perinatal outcomes are expected fetal weight, head circumferences and need of new-born ICU which decide the mode of delivery. These perinatal outcomes will be helpful in increasing the live birth and reducing the risk of premature delivery. The aim of this work is to identify the abnormal AFI of expectant mothers to alert the clinicians. Computer-aided diagnosis supports the clinicians in decision-making process. In the proposed work, using the training set of ultrasound images, the shape templates are developed by using deformable methods. Contour points in the edges will be helpful to find the AFI. After that, features are extracted and fuzzy logic algorithm is used to classify the given image into one of the four categories such as oligohydramnios, borderline, normal and hydramnios state for expectant mothers and their impact on fetal growth. The outcome of the proposed approach is measured in two different ways. The first outcome is that calculated AFI will be compared with the value calculated by the radiologist/clinicians, and the second outcome is that along with AFI, shape feature with contour points and gestational age are used for making decision/classification such as normal, borderline, oligohydramnios and hydramnios, and the classified results will also be compared with the expert’s opinion. The outcomes are represented quantitatively. The results proved that AFI calculated by the proposed work was matching 94% with the expert opinion and classification of test image into any one of the categories such as normal, borderline, oligohydramnios and hydramnios fetched average accuracy of prediction up to 92.5%.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Patel A, Patel HV (2015) Role of amniotic fluid index in pregnancy outcome. IAIM 2(8):1–12

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ross MG Method and system for measuring amniotic fluid volume and/or assessing fetal weight, United States Patent 7399278 B1

  3. Amuthadevi C (2018) Computational intelligence based medical diagnosis. J Comput Theor Nanosci 15(6):2369–2372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ali HS (2009) Assessment of amniotic fluid index in normal pregnancy at a tertiary care hospital setting. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad 21(3):149–159

    Google Scholar 

  5. Tsai PY et al (2012) A new automatic algorithm to extract craniofacial measurements from fetal three-dimensional volumes. Ultrasound Obstet Gynaecol 39(6):642–647

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Salahuddin S, Noda Y, Fujino T, Fujiyama C, Yukihiro NY (1998) An assessment of amniotic index among japanese (a longitudinal study). J Maternal Foetal Investig 8:31–34

    Google Scholar 

  7. Agrawal S, Agrawal V, Yadav S (2015) Comparative study of amniotic fluid index in normal & high-risk pregnancy complicated by PIH. Indian J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2(4):242–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Madhavi K, Rao PC (2015) Clinical study of oligohydramnios, mode of delivery and perinatal outcome. IOSR J Dent Med Sci (IOSR-JDMS) 14(4):6–11

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bhagat M, Chawla I (2014) Correlation of amniotic fluid index with perinatal outcome. J Obstet Gynaecol India 64(1):32–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Sharma N, Srinivasan KJ, Sagayaraj MB, Lal DV (2014) Foetal weight estimation methods—clinical, sonographic and MRI imaging. Int J Sci Res Publ 4(1):1–12

    Google Scholar 

  11. Georgieva P (2016) Fuzzy rule-based systems for decision-making. Eng Sci J Bulg Acad Scis 53:5–16

    Google Scholar 

  12. Costin H (2013) A fuzzy rules-based segmentation method for medical images analysis. Int J Comput Commun 8(2):196–205

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Baskar M, Gnansekaran T (2017) Multi model network analysis for improved intrusion tracing towards mitigating DDoS attack. Asian J Res Soc Sci Hum 7(3):1343–1353

    Google Scholar 

  14. Baskar M, Gnansekaran T (2017) Developing efficient intrusion tracking system using region based traffic impact measure towards the denial of service attack mitigation. J Comput Theor Nanosci 14(7):3576–3582

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Manoj RJ, Praveena MDA, Vijayakumar K (2018) An ACO–ANN based feature selection algorithm for big data. Clust Comput J Netw Softw Tools Appl. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10586-018-2550-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Vijayakumar K, Arun C (2017) Automated risk identification using NLP in cloud based development environments. J Ambient Intell Hum Comput. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-017-0503-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kadam VJ, Jadhav SM, Vijayakumar K (2019) Breast cancer diagnosis using feature ensemble learning based on stacked sparse auto encoders and softmax regression. J Med Syst. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-019-1397-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Zhou J, Rajapakse JC (2005) Segmentation of subcortical brain structures using fuzzy templates. Neuroimage 28:915–924

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Dutta DC (2004) The placenta and the membranes: textbook of obstetrics and gynaecology including perinatology and contraception. In: Hiralal K (ed) 6th ed. New central book agency, Calcutta, India; 2004, pp 38–39

  20. Harliana P, Rahim Ri (2017) Comparative analysis of membership function on Mamdani fuzzy inference system for decision making. J Phys Conf Ser 930:012029. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/930/1/012029

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. Amuthadevi.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Amuthadevi, C., Subarnan, G.M. Development of fuzzy approach to predict the fetus safety and growth using AFI. J Supercomput 76, 5981–5995 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-019-03099-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-019-03099-8

Keywords

Navigation